To whom it may concern:
It has come to my attention through various hunting forums on the internet that Virginia DIGF is allowing hunters in VA to harvest Elk that may have wandered across the boarders from NC, KY, TN, WV. (states that have reintroduced Elk to their habitat)
The way I understand it is that VA doesn't want to reintroduce Elk to our state at this time. So lets just eliminate the ones we find in our state during the "Deer" Season, is the reasoning behind this provision.
I for one think this is very irresponsible of the VA DIGF. It undermines the steps and actions taken by neighboring states to reintroduce Elk (not to mention the vast amounts of money both public & private funds that will be wasted) In my opinion this move by VA DIGF is disrespectful and should be re-evaluated.
This is one VA hunter that will not help you out with this ill thought up plan.
A Virginia Hunter: Mark Griffis
George
------------------
Shoot straight, shoot often, but by all means, use enough gun!
------------------
Jay
"For God and Country"
I agree with you 100%. I sent my opinion to Virginia, but I do not know how much weight it will carry (since I am not a Virginian!). Perhaps we forumites opposed to this practice can send in one signed petition. As well as, our individual e-mails.
Todd E
e-mail is on it way. I agree with you 100%
Our concerns are not that different than Kentucky's as demonstrated by their protocol. Our primary concerns about elk in Virginia relate to the potential for damage to personal property and the potential importation of a disease harmful to domestic livestock and white-tailed deer. Diseases of concern are bovine tuberculosis, brucellosis, chronic wasting disease, and Johne's disease.
The Department will be studying the advisability of elk restoration in Virginia, but only restoration conducted by this department. Until the department and Board makes a decision on this question, the department intends to prevent the immigration of Kentucky elk into this state. We consider Virginia, as does Kentucky, out of Kentucky's restoration zone.
We plan to continue working with RMEF and other state, federal and private entities on assessing the question of restoring elk in Virginia.
I might also point out that West Virginia has not restored elk as you indicated. They will be doing a feasibility study to ascertain if there are areas in their state that might support elk, as the Virginia feasibility did. Elk restoration is not something that should be done in a vacuum and all aspects of the actions taken by an agency must be clearly thought out and shared with all who will be impacted. We do not feel that this was done in the Kentucky's restoration project. It is unfortunate that our agency is being blamed for another's action.
I hope this has clarified some points on the department's position regarding elk restoration. Thank you for your interest in this issue.
Robert Ellis
Assistant Director, Wildlife Division.
Thanks,
Mark Griffis
I am very disappointed in the arrogant, supercilious attitude of the Virginia Game Officials and also of the Kentucky Game Officials. It is unfortunate that they do not communicate effectively.
However, that is beside the point in the long run. The sad facts are, as have already been pointed out previously, that we are living in a world that is hell bent for a major catastrophe. And the problem is that humans are breeding like lemings and overpopulating the planet everywhere.
It is just simply shoveling sand against the tide to keep reintroducing species and at the same time multiply humans at a rate that is taking up land and habitat at an ever increasing rate.
The same story is repeated everywhere. Farmers want to farm and the game wants habitat. There just isn't enough for everyone.
Kendall Dace
i live in buchanan co. no national forrest here all the land belongs to citizens or coalminning companys. i know of no one who will allow you to hunt here if you don't agree to kill the elk. it is possiable to get premits to hunt the minning lands but it takes 1 to 2 years to get them. i'll check around and see what i can find out.
------------------
born on a mountian, raised in a cave, hunting and fishing is all i crave!
------------------
born on a mountian, raised in a cave, hunting and fishing is all i crave!
Unfortunately, farmers will always annihilate wild game so that they do not suffer any loss of of income. I have seen this time and again. Before everyone get upset I have several family members who are farmers. They are very poor. With their new pick-up (tax write off), new $125,000 tractors (plural and again tax write off) and $250,000 combine (again tax write off). They also bring in a fair profit raising hogs and cattle. As with all businesses however, they would very much like to maximize their profits. Therefore, the wildlife must be slaughtered so as not to eat a few hundred dollars worth of corn. Keep in mind that corn is only worth about $2.50 / bushell (good price) and they will get between 100 and 160 bushells / acre. A bushell for those who do not know is about 50 pounds of corn. An acre then will provide around 5000 - 8000 pounds of corn. That is alot of deer feed worth only a few hundred dollars. It does however reduce the total profits of the farm. Grain farmers only make out in volume. If you are a small operation you better get a day job!
In my opinion the elk have more right to the land than the usurping farmers. Give the elk a chance. In many states with reintroductions the farmers are compensated by the state for elk damage to crops. Unfortunately, the farmers do not get the money they seem to feel they are entitled to. This is because the value of the crops destroyed doesn't measure up to the inflated numbers farmers like to ask for.
In many cases the family farm is not a viable business anymore. Some individuals simply will not accept this unpleasant truth.
Todd E
I am one of them! family farms aren't businesses, it's a way of life. not trying to get rich, just tying to get by.
no big farms here! most farms here are less than 100 acres. a few pounds of weight on the cattle or a few 100 bussels of corn means profit or loss!
as i said it's not the elks fought they were here first. but if farmers don't raise the food what will all the city folk eat.
i'm not a farmer just a hillbilly coal minner that lives to hunt.
enough said i'll let it be!
------------------
born on a mountian, raised in a cave, hunting and fishing is all i crave!
[This message has been edited by gone hunting (edited 09-01-2001).]
It has to be more than a few hundred bushells of corn. If that is all the profit the farmer is making he will be living on a few hundred dollars all year! Also, if your cattle are over or under weight the processor will dock you a considerable portion of you $.50 - $.65 per pound on the hoof. Again you will not be in business very long. Anyway, since when do they feed out cattle in Virginia on grass. This is a very slow and inefficient means of feeding out livestock; therefore, you are going to lose your ass! The biggest expense in raising livestock now days is the antibiotics required to keep them healthy since they are typicaly confined to large fenced in feed lots which are full of manure.
If you are trying to survive as a grain farmer on anything less than 800 - 1000 acres I wish you good luck (your screwed buddy).
So quit whining about the wildlife eating / detroying all the farmers! Simply isn't true. Just like coyotes kill cattle all the time. I lost too many big dogs to cows as a kid to believe that BS.
Todd E
Your knowledge of cattle raising is woefully inadequate, the biggest direct expense of raising cattle is one small item.....food in the winter. Vaccinations and antibiotics(if they need them) are a minor part of it.
However, you do have some very valid points about the farmers and ranchers "poor-mouthing" and they all rant and rave about the government but many of them try to be first in line for all the hand outs tha government gives.
As far as the ridiculous argument that the country side is overrun with deer and there is no browse left for the elk, sounds like a serious breakdown on the part of the Va Dept of Game(or whatever they call themselves). If it truly is a serious problem, one or two long seasons, with liberal doe and buck limits will solve that.
As regards deer population in Virginia, I have no direct experience there but a friend, A Texan, Jim Seidel, hunts there at a camp.
He told me there are so many deer in his area they are everywhere. The allowable take, which I can't precisely remember, is something like 4 deer and there is some kind of provision that you can just keep on getting permitted and keep on shooting and taking. Perhaps some of our Virginians can spell it out for us.
Deer are very adaptable. They will live in suburban and the perimiters of urban areas. They hide in open farm country very effectively. Compared to elk, they are diminutive in size. A deer will weigh 150 pounds whereas an elk will weigh 6 times that - 900 pounds.
In some states the deer are so abundant that they are truly a nuisance, a pest and a real danger. In addition to the tick infestations, they browse on expensive landscaping shrubbery and worst of all there are thousands of auto accidents resulting in astronomical sums of money paid out in claims and numerous deaths due to deer vehicle collisions.
Deer will acclimate very quickly to humans and human activity. They, being nocturnal, will browse on the shoulders of Interstate highways with vehicles passing within a few feet at speeds of 65 miles per hour and higher.
As regards the reintroduction of elk, I am personally all for it. However, there will be people who are all for it and people who are against it. The tree huggers will love it and protest if anyone tries to kill elk. The people who are suffering property damage will not be happy.
In some states, a farmer may shoot deer 24 hours @ day ( that does mean at night ) 365 days @ year if he sustains crop damage.
Regarding game crossing state lines, the snowmobilers in yellowstone Park make trails that the Buffalo follow into Montana, leaving the park. The buffalo are shot immediately.
I find it a little bit hard to believe that all of Virginias neighbors have been kept in the dark about Kentuckys elk reintroduction program.
Kendall Dace
This entire discussion is about the land owner getting to shoot whatever steps onto their property just because it is there peroid! The buffalo in Montana, the elk now in Virginia, etc, etc. I have personally slaughter many many deer in the name of crop damage. Not to mention pheasants that we shot from the tractors (with permission of the state DNR) because after all they would simply be run through the mowing machine anyway. Did we do this because the deer were destroying our crops and causing us to lose our way of life...HELL NO! We did because we wanted to shoot deer and they gave us a legally acceptable excuse.
If a state has too many deer then they should issue more tags and/or lengthen there deer seasons. If deer are that plentiful in Virginia maybe I will come on down and help thin the herds. What is the price of a nonresident deer tag and how many can I get?
Please understand I am not a member of PETA. I simply hate the Bullsh*t that farmers spread about how wildlife destroys their livelihood; therefore, they should be allowed to kill everything in sight.
For the record, elk are not as adaptable as white tail deer in that they do not readily move into suburbia!
Also, be careful who you call a yankee. I may live in the north, but I come from very old southern (deep south) family.
Todd E