Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
You'll have to pry my .300 Weatherby from my cold, dead hands! | |||
|
one of us |
Well, I like the cartridges, and the rifles. I don't care much for all that shiny going on, but when subdued a tad, they're great guns. I currently shoot the 300, 340 and 375. Like Battle River, I'm putting together a 270 right now. FWIW - Dan | |||
|
one of us |
I love them shiny weatherbys the most, you know, the kind with them nice fancy stocks, with the big Vari-X III on top. On that same note, them there Remington bdl's make wonderful fenceposts. Trigger | |||
|
<Colonel> |
Eagle Eye; Well if you drive a Volkswagon and look at a Cadillac I can understand why you think there all hype and no substance! This attitude has been around for some time, placed on those who want and enjoy the best by those who for some reason can't or won't spend the bread for the best. But what I cannot understand is a weak firing pin spring! I have had a baker's dozen Weatherby over the last, lets say fifteen years and I can honestly say I have never had a misfire or a failure to feed in any of them. They have never failed to flatten anything I used them on. They have all been MK V action in various models. I would have recommended your rifle to be returned to there service department as soon as the problem was made known. Yes the wood stocks are a thing of beauty to look at, and the shape has its function. I have had Rugers in the past, 77 and #1's, I prefer the Wby to Ruger classic stocks any day! I DO LIKE a classic stock. I have a 8mm Remington Mag. Classic. It looks very nice but its felt recoil is fifty percent more than my 300 Wby. Just for those who enjoy pain while there shooting I highly recommend a Ruger #1 in 300 Wby. I had one once, and that was enough!
LIFE IS LIKE A SH**T SANDWICH THE MORE BREAD YOU HAVE THE LESS SH**T YOU HAVE TO EAT! The women in my life (wife, mother, sister-in law, etc) have the same remark " I wish they made furniture in that kind of wood." [This message has been edited by Colonel (edited 05-09-2002).] | ||
<Eagle Eye> |
Just for the record Colonel, I responded as I did because your opinion was so glowing and so opposite to my Weatherby experiences that frankly, you sounded just like 'ol Bill himself. I won't waste my time to respond to your typical arrogant comments. | ||
<Colonel> |
quote: You did! | ||
<Eagle Eye> |
Well, perhaps I wasn't clear enough for you.... | ||
one of us |
I got em and I like em!! I'm on my second 257Wby. This one is the Ultralight and it makes for a very nice Antelope rifle. I'm not a fan of synthetic stocks but I do like these. I also have the ultralight in 7mm-08 and 22-250 and the varmint in 243. This rifle will shoot one hole groups all day. | |||
|
one of us |
my only experience with a weatherby rifle was not so good. Needing a lightweight all around rifle, I decided on the ultra-lightweight weatherby in 30/06. I was impressed with the feel of the gun, I loved the action, they synthetic stock was better than 90% of those out there, and it had a 24 inch barrel, which was a real plus to me. I kept that rifle for a year. I was the most eratic shooting thing I have ever seen, sometimes throwing the first bullet from a cold barrel as much as 8 inches from the other shots in a group. I tried changing pressure points on the barrel I tried different bullet weights, I really liked this rifle and wanted it to shoot well. After calling weatherby a couple of times I sent it one of their repair centers who after 3 months said they had the problem fixed. to make a long story short I just traded for a rem 700 titanium (I lost a couple hundred $$ on the trade but had no confidence in the rifle)which is 1/4 pound lighter and since the reciever is tititanium has a heavier contour barrel and actually balanced better. anyway thats my only weatherby experience | |||
|
<JerrBear356> |
I am going to keep this short and sweet. The Weatherby calibers are great and can be even better when improved (like most calibers), but the rifles are a waste of money and definately aren't worth their cost. | ||
one of us |
quote: Bizarre. I am now well into 1600 rounds with various Weatherbys, including the ULWs in magnum and standard models, and have yet to have a misfire. A friend is well over 700 rounds with his three Weatherbys, including an ULW, with no misfires. Perhaps this "known issue" is known only to you and your reloading techniques. | |||
|
one of us |
quote: Again, bizarre. The ULW is not a rifle for the casual shooter as it is very light and needs to be gripped firmly and shot with a very careful trigger press. That said, my .30-06 ULW has been accurate right out of the box. The Sierra 180 SBT averages 3/4 MOA at 100 yards, and 1/2 MOA at 200 yards. | |||
|
<Eagle Eye> |
Oh please KuduKing, don't start your "bizare" talk! It doesn't wash!!! It isn't bizare that a firing pin main spring didn't meet spec with the correct tension just because you haven't ever seen it happen. Have you ever seen a firing pin break....over the past 30 years that I have been shooting, it happened to me once. The fifth shot out of a brand new Browning Stainless Stalker. My reloads fault, yeah right. By the way, we tried factory ammo in the Wea UL as well and that was after it was supposedly fixed....it worked for 18 rounds then guess what....click. I suppose you will want to blame Federal for that one. If you had done more research on this topic, you would have known that this isn't the first time it has occurred. As for blaming the poster "hotweatherhunter" as being the cause for bad accuracy stating that he was as you put it "a casual shooter" ...again, what is so bizare about having a bad rifle? You might think that everything with a Weatherby nameplate is top notch, but I am sorry to be the one to tell you King, it ain't so! If you need proof, look at their site right now and take note of the recall that is in effect. No, your post just doesn't wash....shooting a rifle off the bench on sand bags pretty well negates the issue of weight that you brought up....besides, how often do casual shooters spend $1500 on a specialized rifle like that? You choose to ignore the fact that he replaced the UL with a Remington Ti that is lighter still. You know Kudu, you sound just like a GM exec stating "it wasn't our fault there was a safety recall, the government made us do it". [This message has been edited by Eagle Eye (edited 05-11-2002).] | ||
one of us |
What was the age old saying? The three most over rated things in the world. "Teenage pussy,Harley Davidson motorcycles and Weatherby rifles" | |||
|
<Eagle Eye> |
Good one...I don't know if I'd include pussy in that list though! ;o | ||
one of us |
Not all pussy just the inexperienced stuff. | |||
|
<Eagle Eye> |
Yeah but providing that experience can be rewarding in itself! | ||
one of us |
That's true,they all have to be taught sometime. | |||
|
one of us |
quote: The only thing unwashed is your own buffoonery. I never claimed Weatherby's are totally 100% in every instance unfallable. YOU, on the other hand, are willing to condemn what is a perfectly fine rifle, that has been hunted all over the globe with great success, because of YOUR one bad experience, unshared by thousands of others. Then you make up some idiotic "known issue" about firing pins in Weatherby's breaking. Which is complete and utter nonsense. You also have trouble reading the English language. I never wrote that hotweatherhunter was a casual shooter. I disagreed with his accuracy findings, as most other Weatherby owners would. Why don't you share some of your "research" on this firing pin issue with all of us? When you are not having sex with teenage girls. You must have some strange karma about you to be invovled in so many gun problems: Weatherby, Browning. I suggest you try washing. | |||
|
<Eagle Eye> |
I have gone through and read your many posts..... seems I am not the only one that disagrees with what you post. Too bad you can't read....you seem to make far too many assumptions. Just to clarify my original post for you, I said I was disappointed with my Weatherby rifle...after spending $1500 for a rifle, I had good reason to be considering what happened. You then made incorrect assumptions and then went on and slammed another dissatified buyer by inferring he was a casual shooter. You sound like a sore looser. Unfortunately, you obviously don't even have a sense of humour. That is sad. | ||
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia