Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Feds give early OK to limited wolf hunt in Idaho ..Federal wildlife officials have signaled their preliminary approval for Idaho's petition to kill up to 60 endangered gray wolves from packs that have been preying heavily on big game herds in the upper Clearwater River Basin. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service published a draft environmental review Thursday in which it proposed to approve a wolf hunt plan in the Lolo zone that had been submitted last August by Idaho Fish and Game. A similar petition from Montana — to remove 12 wolves in the Bitterroot Range — remains pending. Wolves in the Northern Rockies are listed as an endangered species under a federal court order, but state and federal officials have been looking for ways to curb their population. The Idaho and Montana hunt proposals stem from a 2008 rule change by the Fish and Wildlife Service that allows states to remove wolves if they are harming deer or elk herds. Federal officials must sign off on the any proposed hunts following a scientific review. The rule is under a court challenge by wildlife advocates. A hearing in the case is set for next month in Missoula, before U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy. U.S. Fish and Wildlife officials stressed Thursday that a final decision on Idaho's plan has not been made. But the federal agency's Idaho supervisor, Brian Kelly said state officials "seem to have provided pretty good data that wolves are a factor" behind declining elk populations in an area known as the Lolo zone. "They've tried more liberal hunting seasons on other predators like black bears and mountain lions. They've tried habitat improvements, changes in the hunting framework for elk — and they're still not seeing a response" in terms of elk numbers rebounding, Kelly said. The environmental review published Thursday opens a 30-day comment period. Kelly said it could be weeks or months before a decision is made. Officials in Wyoming also want to reduce wolf numbers in their state, but only Montana and Idaho have federally approved management plans for the species. Wolves across most of the Northern Rockies are considered an "experimental, non-essential" population because they were reintroduced in the mid-1990s instead of naturally colonizing the area. That designation gives federal officials wider latitude to kill wolves that cause problems, and also allows livestock owners to kill wolves when their animals come under attack. | ||
|
One of Us |
I guess they saw the writting on the wal since Butch Ottor said we'll allow hunting anyways! Already said he will not allow state officials to bring charges for killing a wolf! This will get stopped by the animal rights groups so it will be back to shoot shovel and shutup! One shot One Kill | |||
|
One of Us |
And what were the original population goals for Idaho? Why are the Feds not managing wolves to those levels? What do I think? It's a good start. And we have been FED lies, pun intended. So now the States have to prove a negative effect on game populations? What a crock! Wolves are just like taxes, they are going to keep going up and up no matter how much FEDS lie about reducing and managing them. When I grew up I got soap in mouth for lying. They could allow unregulated sport hunting for wolves, and they will never get rid of them. Endangered, my butt. | |||
|
One of Us |
MIGHT AS WELL DELIST, WE ALREADY HAVE.... | |||
|
One of Us |
They aren't grey wolves. Grey wolves are only about twice the size of a full grown coyote. These are Lobos, out of Canada. 150lbs up to pushing 200. They are about as legal in Idaho as the illegal aliens we are plagued with. Rich | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia