Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Sometimes when a client inspects one of my model 70 push feeds, he will have a look on his face like he is handling a turd. I have these rifles in .30-06 and .270 and they shoot under 2 inch groups at 200 meters day in and day out. I find them to be MORE accurate than the claw extractor model Winchester. Fine hunting rifles. | ||
|
Moderator |
John, Remind the client that he/she could have brought their own rifle, but chose the convenience of using a 'house rifle'. I always have to bring my own guns because I am a lefty. George | |||
|
one of us |
Quote: Because they are dumbasses. Every deer I've killed died by being shot with push feed rifles, either a Howa or a Sako. When US military weapons have a controlled round feed extractor, I will consider one important. | |||
|
one of us |
...i would think that cfr would be relevant/required only in the case of hunting dg, and superfluous in all other cases... te | |||
|
one of us |
what's more dangerous? a dumb animal that is running at you or a number of enemy with automatic rifles shooting 125grn 30cal bullets? stupid argument! either the weapon works or it doesn't Sgt.Krohn | |||
|
one of us |
ive used 2 push feeds. no deer that was shot with them didnt know that it wasnt a crf winchester. they are kinda like a model 700 with a diferent safety. | |||
|
one of us |
I've used push feeds for most of my hunting. I've been to Africa 3 times, and the PH's had as many push feeds as CRF. | |||
|
one of us |
My sentiments exactly, and don't forget...controlled round feeders fail as well. Is somebody out there trying to tell us that a Winchester, Ruger or CZ CRF is more reliable for DG than a SAKO? Reliability is a 60 degree bolt throw mated with cock on close...this even works for the most excited, least coordinated homo sapiens on the planet. CRF is an afterthought. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia