THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AMERICAN BIG GAME HUNTING FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  American Big Game Hunting    Park Service defends refusal to use wolves

Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Park Service defends refusal to use wolves
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
http://xfinity.comcast.net/art.../US.Wolves.Colorado/


Park Service defends refusal to use wolves
By DAN ELLIOTT, AP
44 minutes ago


BOULDER, Colo. — The National Park Service acted properly when it ruled out using wolves to control the elk population in Rocky Mountain National Park, government lawyers argued Thursday before a federal appeals court.

The government also defended the use of trained volunteers to help Park Service employees shoot and kill excess elk, saying it didn't violate a hunting ban in national parks.

In a hearing before the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a law student representing the wildlife advocacy group WildEarth Guardians argued the Park Service did not give enough consideration to the wolf option and rejected it without giving the public a chance to comment.

The group also said letting volunteers shoot elk instead of limiting the shooting to Park Service employees was tantamount to hunting.

WildEarth Guardians sued the Park Service in 2008, asking a Denver federal judge to overturn the park's elk-thinning policy. The judge upheld the policy last year, and WildEarth Guardians appealed to the 10th Circuit.

The appeals court normally meets in Denver but heard this case at the University of Colorado Law School in Boulder as part of an outreach program. The judges did not say when they would rule.

Rocky Mountain National Park sometimes has so many elk that they overgraze the vegetation, leaving other animals without enough food and habitat. Few natural predators are left there, and hunting is prohibited, so little remains to keep the elk population in check.

The park launched a 20-year program in 2008 to thin the herd by having park employees and trained volunteers under park supervision periodically shoot and kill elk. The program also includes fences to protect vegetation from elk and redistributing some of the animals.

Officials said reintroducing wolves to control elk numbers was infeasible. They cited a lack of support from other agencies, safety concerns of people who live nearby, expected conflicts between wolves and humans and the amount of attention that a wolf population would require of park officials.

Park spokeswoman Kyle Patterson said 131 elk have been killed in the culling program during since 2008.

The current size of the herd in the park's lower elevations is 600 to 800, which is within the target range set by the program, so no elk were killed last winter.

No decision has been made on whether or how many elk will be killed this coming winter.

Wolves disappeared from much of the West after decades of hunting and government-backed extermination. They were re-introduced in Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming in 1995, and some advocates have argued for bringing them back elsewhere.

___

Follow Dan Elliott at http://twitter.com/DanElliottAP


Kathi

kathi@wildtravel.net
708-425-3552

"The world is a book, and those who do not travel read only one page."
 
Posts: 9569 | Location: Chicago | Registered: 23 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of don444
posted Hide Post
Wolves Suck !!!! They need to be controlled and not let loose to roam on their own.
 
Posts: 551 | Location: Idaho | Registered: 27 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Wolves do suck!!! They need to be shot, trapped and ....


ddj


The best part of hunting and fishing was the thinking about going and the talking about it after you got back - Robert Ruark
 
Posts: 966 | Location: Northwest Iowa | Registered: 10 June 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
"Officials said reintroducing wolves to control elk numbers was infeasible. They cited a lack of support from other agencies, safety concerns of people who live nearby, expected conflicts between wolves and humans and the amount of attention that a wolf population would require of park officials."

How come this never applies to us near Yellowstone?
 
Posts: 210 | Location: NW Wyoming | Registered: 20 February 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
According to the Park's 2012 update to their EVMP, they culled zero elk during the 2011-2012 winter period. So their small numbers of culled elk, the State of Colorado increasing cow elk licenses in areas bordering the park, in conjunction with heavy snow during two winter/spring seasons has brought the number of elk wintering within the park into the EVMP sustainable range in less than five years. As they accurately state, wolves are not needed nor are they desirable within the park...


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
they will be there soon enough.
give them a few more years.
we got them allready and they are making an impact on the reduced herds we allready had.
it's only a 4 hr drive to colorado from here.
and plenty of open areas to cross without any inteference.
when the numbers of deer and elk drop to near nothing you'll know you got them.
just go to yellowstone and attempt to see much more than some bufallo.
i have been there for over a week every year for the last three years and have seen the one elk herd [about 15 cows in browns hole] one deer,one moose, and one lone bull elk.
 
Posts: 5005 | Location: soda springs,id | Registered: 02 April 2008Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  American Big Game Hunting    Park Service defends refusal to use wolves

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia