quote:

Originally posted by 505 gibbs:

quote:

looking only to "control" others and what they are/should be allowed to hunt. It really has nothing to do with lion conservation, its all about the POWER of control.

quote:

Brad - Obviously I think your stance on the two different issues is hypocritical, you obviously think its rational, we disagree.

Actually Aaron, I have not taken a "stance" on the reason, I simply listed multiple reasons as to why the difference response. I didn't say they were right or wrong. You simply asked for an explanation, I simply gave several simple explananations.

Man, numerous times you've called us Zealots and told us we are just trying to control hunters/hunting, now you act like you have no idea what I'm talking about????

You are correct, multiple times I have referred to some of the members of your organization as "zealots", have I in this thread? I have not taken a side in this thread, rather I have offered potential answers to questions you have posed. I am not "acting" like anything, rather I am trying to not let past circumstances hinder communication on the present thread. I am sure Lane and I could get fired up again at each other, but what purpose would that serve?

As for my last quote, which you took only 3/4 of the sentence, so it would fit into your context, really man?? Now were playing word games? Ok, done with you on this one. You win, I lose again.

Aaron Neilson

I only took 3/4 of the sentence because that is the only part that was pertinent to what I was asking. I will attach the entire quote below, but would still like an answer to my question. As for your final statement, what did I win and where can I pick it up?

quote:

The Entire quote by Aaron Neilson:
You're right again Brad. I forgot, we're Zealots, looking only to "control" others and what they are/should be allowed to hunt. It really has nothing to do with lion conservation, its all about the POWER of control.