one of us
| Looks from here like a sportered No. 4 Mk. 1. What does the left side of the receiver look like?
There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t. – John Green, author
|
| |
One of Us
| |
| |
One of Us
| And it was rebuilt in 1947 by Fazakerly. FTR means Factory Thorough Repair. They are the ones that probably cut it down and put the recoil pad on it. |
| |
one of us
| Tom, I didn't know Fazakerly actually sportered Enfields -- thought they just rebuilt them to pattern room/List of Changes condition. The No. 4 Mk. 1 had the best sights and stiffest barrel of the Enfields and makes a capable hunting rifle.
There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t. – John Green, author
|
| |
One of Us
| I have one of the Parker Hale sporters. Started out as a Long Branch #4MKI*. They cut the barrel down to about 22", installed a ramp front sight which takes the standard #4 military front sight blades, they also cut down the forestock, and left the standard military rear sight.Has a 2 groove barrel and seriously thinking about sending it to JES and having it rebored to .375. Cast my own bullets so that won't be a problem. The cartridge is the 37 Rimmed which is nothing more than the .303 British necked up to .375 and no other changes. Should be fun to shoot. Frank |
| |
One of Us
| That was a joke; sorry. Bubba butchered that Enfield. |
| |
one of us
| Tom, I was "took in" by your post, and fully admit it.
There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t. – John Green, author
|
| |
One of Us
| Bill, now I feel bad that it was you that took the bait. But I know you know better. |
| |
One of Us
| I had a similar rifle, except not operated on by a Bubba. It had a new 5 groove BSA barrel and the 1 MOA flip-up sight with adjustment screw. Would hold under 2 MOA with the 185 gr. Lee cast bullet and 15-16 gr. of 4759. Sold it because I had 2 03A3's that shot better, but a good accurate rifle!
Clarence |
| Posts: 303 | Location: Hill Country, TX | Registered: 26 December 2006 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Tom, no worries, my friend. I should have known better. I used to even have Skennerton's big book on the Enfields, so absolutely no excuse.
There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t. – John Green, author
|
| |
One of Us
| Yep; I got my first #4 in 1966; when you could just order guns directly through the mail. Cost $24, which was a fortune for a high school kid. |
| |
One of Us
| Parker Hale I think did a bunch of conversions on the #4 platform as well as the pattern 14 enfield in 303 british. Then again Santa Fe arms did a bunch of conversions on the enfields both pattern 14 and 1917, and I believe both the 1903 and 1903A3 Springfields. Frank |
| |
one of us
| quote: Originally posted by dpcd: Yep; I got my first #4 in 1966; when you could just order guns directly through the mail. Cost $24, which was a fortune for a high school kid. http://www.usinflationcalculator.com/$24.00 in 1966 equal to $178.78 today. Shows you how much fiat money has been printed in this country. That would be a fortune today for a high school kid unless he had rich parents. |
| |
One of Us
| Interesting. I made the money by cutting grass and plowing gardens, and at 3 to 5 dollars a job, it didn't take long to save. Bought a Winchester 94, pre 64 the same year, for $60 but my father paid half. It is hard to equate then and now on money value. It didn't seem like $178 does now. Maybe it was. |
| |
one of us
| My Marines got me a No 4 when I got out. They were going for $135 at Rose's department store in 1995. I was shocked/touched they would spend over $100 on a going away gift. The calculator says that's like almost $500 now. I don't know. Hard to compare.
Shot it about 2 weeks ago. Still very accurate. My most accurate Milsurp, though rivaled by a Finnish Mosin Nagant. |
| Posts: 1734 | Location: Maryland | Registered: 17 January 2004 |
IP
|
|