Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Like we need another bore diameter! Being 325 instead of 323, all they are doing is avoiding people saying it is a rehashed 8 mm version. Who thinks of it as a superduper 32 Winchester Special??? | ||
|
one of us |
Like we need another bore diameter! Being 325 instead of 323, all they are doing is avoiding people saying it is a rehashed 8 mm version. Who thinks of it as a superduper 32 Winchester Special??? This one is strictly a creation of the marketing dept. Since it is not in 338 they will not have to worry as much about people saying it will be competition for the 338 Mag. The 300 WSM hurt the sales of 300 Win Mags, I am sure. This is when they want to sell both. I don't see a need for it, except as a wild cat for the guys who like to carry something different. The extra 2000th of diameter bullets will be handy for extending the life of a shot out 8 mm if one does not do Cast bullets. Beyond that..... YAAAAWNNN cheers and good shooting seafire | |||
|
one of us |
| |||
|
one of us |
I miss that beer! As for the 325, as I said, I just want the bullets for my other eights (I'm still a rifle loon tho', just can't help myself). - Dan | |||
|
one of us |
Quote: But all this begs the question: If all of these cartridges had not had a belt, (with the exception of the 375 H&H and straight wall cases that need the belt for headspacing)everything else had been the same, except the chamber and case head had been designed as "beltless", would that have changed the outcome? I don't think so. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia