THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Page 1 2 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
the trouble with the .308 !
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by xausa:
A 180 grain .30 caliber spitzer bullet with a BC of .445 and a MV of 3000 fps.has a terminal velocity at 500 yards of only 2021 and therefore takes about .6 second to reach its target.

How far do you think an elk can move in that amount of time?

I once had a fringe eared oryx take a single step at the instant I fired a shot at him with my .300 H&H at only 300 yards. The point of impact was moved by about a foot, so that rather than making a raking shot from the lower rib cage to the off shoulder, the result was a classic gut shot.

Fortunately, I was hunting in a desert terrain, and we were able to follow the animal in his headlong flight and recover him.

I was shooting from a prone position, with a rock steady hold, and my PH was glassing the animal as I fired. Had that not been the case, I would have thought that I had missed the animal completely, due to his lack of reaction to the shot.

I am an experienced target shooter, routinely shooting at ranges up to 600 and even 1000 yards with non-optical sights. 300 yards would have been close range for me in competition, but only against a target which is guaranteed to be stationary.

I have killed hundreds of crows at that range with various varmint rifles, but the vital area of a crow is small enough that a shot is either a hit or a miss. I don't ever recall wounding a crow. Wounding an elk. or even worse a dangerous animal like a bear, is an entirely different story. I have never shot at dangerous game at a range of over 50 yards, and after my experience with the oryx, confined my shots at plains game to under 300 yards.



Sage advice
 
Posts: 373 | Location: British Columbia | Registered: 13 April 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The difference in a 30-06 and a .308 in the hunting field is impossible to separate, they are the same within reasonable hunting ranges on the same game animal. I use my .308 Sav 99 for elk with a 180 gr. Nosler at 2600 FPS, its flat and easy to pack on my saddle and doesn't bend my knee outward.. I use my 30-06 when Im not horseback with a 180 gr. bullet at 2700 FPS..

Whats all the bsflag about? its about 100 FPS..Those that have not used both on both are apparent by their very posts..You can't tell any difference up to probably 400 yards on game the size of elk, Moose or all plainsgame and Ive shot Eland with both...Ive used both for years and wouldn't be without both in my gun cabinet..I would even add the 7x57 with a good handload to make it a trio...

I "try" to keep my shots within 300 to 350 yards with an ocassional 400 yard shot under ideal conditions and my frame of mind at the time, and depending on the animal.


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42210 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The same old same old those that don't want shouldn't.

A critter that moves at just the right time even at a 100 yards can cause a perfectly aimed shot to miss or wound.

If you that worried about wounding a critter one should not shoot at all.

Then of course never at moving game, game in the brush or under any circumstances where one might wound.



Any time one pulls the trigger the potential is there to wound.

The only way to be sure you never wound a animal is not to shoot at all.
 
Posts: 19707 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'm sorry you don't grasp the difference between wounding an animal 100 yards away and one 500 yards away, in the case of an elk, likely across canyon or in a clearing in the midst of dense timber. The difference is the time between the shot and the follow up, in the event of a mishap.

I have certainly wounded animals in my 60 odd years of hunting experience, but when I did, my first priority was to locate them and end their suffering. Long range shooters don't seem to share this concern.
 
Posts: 1748 | Registered: 27 March 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Xausa, has a point hard to argue with...Its much easier to wound as the range increases, that said its rare indeed that an animal moves at that very moment, in most cases one wiggled at the last moment and blamed it on the the elk.. Roll Eyes


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42210 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Long range hunting is not my thing at all.
If you are going to do it, you better know what you are doing, a lot more guys think the know what they are doing than actually know.
If you are not doing one heck of a lot of shooting , stick to 300 yards.
To many guys think a Magnum rifle, and a varmint scope with a ballistic reticle, is as good as skill, but that's why i see lots of deer hobbling around during elk season...
 
Posts: 605 | Location: OR | Registered: 28 March 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Amen TJ


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42210 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of sambarman338
posted Hide Post
This argument about animals moving at the shot being complicated by bullet-flight time is a good one and yet another reason not to make really long shots on game.

I must add it to a future book update Smiler
 
Posts: 5161 | Location: Melbourne, Australia | Registered: 31 March 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I made that same argument with a fellow who told me the only thing wrong witht the 308 was it wasn't a 30-06. My reply was a 30-06 won't fit in a 99 Savage...

Therein is the difference, The 308 was designed for short action rifles to safe weight mostly. It fits the picture perfectly.

The ballistics are pretty darn close to a 30-06 with bullets up to and including the 180 gr. A 100 FPS isn't a hell of a lot to get your shorts in a wad..

Ive killed elk and PG with both and both worked just fine..


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42210 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by p dog shooter:
quote:
All you have to do is to close the distance if shooting a .308. That's what I implied on my previous post.


Then way not just use a 30-30.

All you have to do is close the distance.

A .308 is not a 06 and 06 just as a 06 is not a 300mag.

I like my 30-30, I like my 308s, I like my 06's and I like my 300mags.

They over lap in many situations but each does things in terms of velocity and bullet weight that that the other can't.


I guess I was not clear? Please let me explain again:

Both the .308 and .30-06 use the same bullet diameter. The .30-06's case holds a little more powder than the .308's case. Common sense would tell me that these two cartridges aren't the same, and I have never said that they are.

All I said is that if both the .30-06 and .308 fire the same bullet, the .30-06 one will reach a slightly longer distance. But as stated in the article I posted above somewhere, the arguments about the .30-06 versus the .308 have gone on forever, and that these arguments are nonsense.
 
Posts: 492 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 20 November 2013Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I second the man from Alaska, its all nonsense! A proper bullet fron either will do the job! Can't get any simpler than that, My 06 and 308 are 30-30 at some point down range..


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42210 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The real beauty of the .308 is that it can be used in short action rifles, such as the Winchester 70 Classic Compact that I have. What a nice little gun. Nice and light and easy to carry. The older one gets the less one cares about that extra 100 FPS and the more one cares about nice lightweight equipment.
 
Posts: 2059 | Location: Mpls., MN | Registered: 28 June 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
and the ruger american!
 
Posts: 1546 | Location: south of austin texas | Registered: 25 November 2011Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Other than the fact that I like lever actions that are light and handy and the fact that you can't stick a 30-06 in a Sav. 99 or a Browning Lever action the 06 is probably better but how much so is the question..Thats what the .308 was designed for at a time when no good cartridge was to be had in a decent short action rifle..except for the 95 Win. and it wasn't scope friendly and heavy as hell..


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42210 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Wstrnhuntr
posted Hide Post
The only performance difference between 308 and 06 will be with 180 gr slugs and up, and even that is negligible. Otherwise it is 6 of one and half a dozen of the other.
Those questioning the strength of the 99 need to consider the fact that it has been handling high intensity .308 Win loads for decades. Unless of course you like to hot rod your rifles, then all bets are off anyway. The only issue with them is that there will be just enough give in them to cause eventual case head separation, and this is going to occur even with factory 300 Savage loads. BUT, it can be largely overcome by using Milsurp brass and appropriate loads.
 
Posts: 10188 | Location: Tooele, Ut | Registered: 27 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Logic has stolen this thread, how can that be? rotflmo


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42210 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill/Oregon
posted Hide Post
Great thread. The .308 has always made me fall asleep at first mention, but it does come into its own in the Model 99 with best modern bullets, though I have never owned one. My only experience in this platform has been with the .250 (Ray, you might recall this one) and the .300, and I never had a shot at game with either. Brother took a 99 in .300 on our trip to Namibia some years ago, but borrowed my CZ in 9,3X62 for all his shots -- and outshot me with my own damned rifle. But then he can also identify ducks at 150 yards that I can hardly even see. At least I was born handsome ...
hilbily


There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t.
– John Green, author
 
Posts: 16669 | Location: Las Cruces, NM | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
IMO, and based soley on my use of both guns, I will contend the 30-06 walks off with 200 gr. bullets at 180 gr. velocity of 2650 to 2700 FPS for both, so why then use the 180s. I have not used the 180s for that reason, why would I?? and the 200 gr. Accubond will hold its velocity and trajectory better..

The 308 is at its best with 150 gr. bullets and the 165 will compete with the 180 in velocity and the 180 in a 22" barrel is 100 FPS less than my fwt 30-06 by 100 FPS. Its a no brainer the 308 isn't up to 06 velocity with 200 gr. bullets..where is the argument here, its just
self satisfaction taken to its limit.. rotflmo


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42210 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia