The Accurate Reloading Forums
Winchester .338 WM super express

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/3221043/m/854108842

11 April 2005, 00:06
Sendero300
Winchester .338 WM super express
Winchester has a new run of rifles out....or maybe these are special order..
Just saw a .338 super express on gunsamerica.

Nice plains game gun.......barrel band swivel, sights etc.


Sendero300>>>===TerryP
11 April 2005, 00:31
AnotherAZWriter
Just my opinion (as is everything all of us ever post) but I would never have a .338 Win with a barrel band swivel. I have one on my Mod70 .416, but I can live with it.

Barrel bands relegate the tight sling to the scrap heap, and since shooting sitting with a tight sling is one of my favorites, it spells bad news for me.

My .416 hits 6 inches low at 200 yards when I shoot with a tight sling.


Don't Ever Book a Hunt with Jeff Blair
http://forums.accuratereloadin...821061151#2821061151

11 April 2005, 01:42
HP Shooter
quote:
Originally posted by AnotherAZWriter:
Just my opinion (as is everything all of us ever post) but I would never have a .338 Win with a barrel band swivel. I have one on my Mod70 .416, but I can live with it.

Barrel bands relegate the tight sling to the scrap heap, and since shooting sitting with a tight sling is one of my favorites, it spells bad news for me.

My .416 hits 6 inches low at 200 yards when I shoot with a tight sling.


I was starting to feel lonely here, thinking I was the only one who knew how to use a sling for its true purpose. thumb
11 April 2005, 01:47
okie john
Jack O'Connor said that a sling was worth its weight in rubies. I agree.

Okie John


"The 30-06 works. Period." --Finn Aagaard
11 April 2005, 02:07
nyrifleman
Not all rifles will shoot to a different point of impact when using a sling from a bbl band. Likewise, some rifles shoot to a different point of impact when the swivel stud is on the stock. I have rifles that exhibit both characteristics. Each rifle is an individual, and must be shot from a tight sling to acertain whether or not a sling will change point of impact, regardless of the sling swivel's position on the rifle. Lee Helgeland is going to build me a custom pre-64 in 338 Win Mag, and it will have a bbl band, my personal preference in calibers 338 and above. Necessary? No, my preference. I will shoot the rifle from a tight sling before taking it afield, as anyone should who understands how to properly employ a sling.


Doug
11 April 2005, 02:08
AnotherAZWriter
quote:
Originally posted by okie john:
Jack O'Connor said that a sling was worth its weight in rubies. I agree.

Okie John


Jack also wrote something like "You should be able to keep your shots under 3 MOA in the field with a sling shooting sitting."

I don't think it is tough to keep them under one MOA; certainly less than 1.25 MOA.


Don't Ever Book a Hunt with Jeff Blair
http://forums.accuratereloadin...821061151#2821061151

14 April 2005, 20:10
Pathfinder
quote:
My .416 hits 6 inches low at 200 yards when I shoot with a tight sling.


I would think that's just about right if you're shot in for 100yds. I guess I don't see the problem, unless you mean 6" lower than the rifle is sighted in for @ 200 yds.
14 April 2005, 21:08
mark65x55
Wow, those sure are pretty! But at $1200 I think my old ugly stainless model 70 will work just fine.


______________________
14 April 2005, 21:36
<allen day>
I agree with AZ and others.

I shoot with a sling quite a bit, and I would NEVER, and I mean EVER purchase or order a .338 Win. Mag. with a barrel-band front swivel. It just doesn't kick hard enough to warrant that feature. I wouldn't want a .338 with a 26" barrel, either, but at least that excess can be trimmed back to 24".

I've seen some expensive, crazy, brain-fart-inspired, custom 'art rifles' in chamberings such as .270 Win. complete with purposeless barrel-band swivels, and sometimes even quarter ribs with folding-leave open sights, etc! A rifles needs to be dressed for its proper role, not be turned into something it isn't and wasn't designed to be in the first place.

AD
14 April 2005, 21:51
Roland1
No barrel band front swivel, my rifles in .338 - .375 H&H have all 21" barrels, the all shoot moa or better, the easy handling and flexibility in multiple situations with shorter barrels is in my humble opinion a must.

Roland
15 April 2005, 00:53
Jim in Idaho
Apparently they come in two versions with a wooden or a synthetic stock. The synthetic stock version has the forward sling swivel in the forearm. Although since that is probably a tupperware stock you'd want to replace it.

Wood stock http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.asp?Item=30635963

Synthetic stock http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.asp?Item=30661638


Gunnery, gunnery, gunnery!
Hit the target, all else is twaddle.
16 April 2005, 02:51
Atkinson
I much prefer the barrel band swivel but I never need a sling for hunting and have not used one in some 30 years...Don't need it. If I have time to wrap up in a sling then I have time to find a natural rest...

I like the lower profile I get with a barrel band carry, and I know you can carry a gun barrel down, but in a long walk you tend to switch carries in the real world....


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
16 April 2005, 03:28
schromf
quote:
I like the lower profile I get with a barrel band carry, and I know you can carry a gun barrel down, but in a long walk you tend to switch carries in the real world....


My sentements exactly. When I carry with a sling over my shoulder, I like the least amount of barrel above my head. None is best and the only way that happens is with a barrel band.

To bad somebody hasn't work out a quick detach system that a embedded front swivel was on the forend of the stock, and it could shap on to the barrel band. This would pretty much give you the best of both worlds.