I think it's just a compilation of stuff that's been known for quite some time, and that the author had to throw in the other cartridges in the article just because there's not enough material on the 338 Federal to make some interesting reading.
/ Rikard
Posts: 209 | Location: Sweden | Registered: 30 October 2003
I do wish that at least once in a while American writers would give passing mention to the first "short-action" commercial belted .338 Magnum to arrive in North America. It was/is reportedly the .330 BSA which was introduced in BSA bolt-action rifles (built on P-14 actions) in 1920 and a few years thereafter. It is still a great little cartridge and worthy of use.
Oh, and it always did use .338" diameter bullets, never .333" ones.
My country gal's just a moonshiner's daughter, but I love her still.
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001
Overall a good article. I shoot a .338 Win, and a .340 Wby and .338 Lapua, obviously I like the caliber and different chamberings offered in it. jro45, your .338 Ultra mag was mentioned but not detailed as to loads, the same was true of the Lapua. My .340 Wby has served me well in Alaska and Colorado, the .338 Lapua in Colorado for me and my grandson. Good shooting.
phurley
Posts: 2376 | Location: KY | Registered: 22 September 2004
Well, in the end, they could've written more detail and dedicated 20 pages to the article. But they didn't, and that's fine.
I would've liked to have seen more on the .338-06, .338 Federal and .338 Win M. The others (great cartridges) are an exageration IMO. The .340 and .338 Weatherby are incredible as well as the Lapua.
I have just received my .338-06 the other day (ER Shaw rebarrel of a Savage 110 .30-06) so I can't wait for the ammo and off the to the range I go.
How come the energy for the .338-06 isn't easily available? I've been trying to find out what the energy is for certain loads (210, 225, 250 Nosler Partitions) at different distances (0, 50, 100, 200, 300) but it seems to be hard to come by.