THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Sightron
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Would these be a good hunting bino.?

They weigh only 12.6 oz. I do not like a heavy burden on neck while walking all day.

The full size 10 X 42 are 2 pounds.(29 oz)

http://www.opticsplanet.net/si...ulars-siiwp1025.html
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
AR, I would ask Doug at Cameraland, and or Jon at the Optic Zone, I've bought quite a few scopes and binos from these guys, and they know their stuff...

Having said that, I have no experience with Sightron binos, but I have had two of their scopes, will never have another one unless something really changes!
 
Posts: 3563 | Location: GA, USA | Registered: 02 August 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks fish,

Actually was looking more for opinions on the 10 X 25 specs. as a hunting bino. I want something light.
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of larrys01
posted Hide Post
I quit handling there Scopes a couple years ago due to quality issues. Never tried their Binoculars?



 
Posts: 1525 | Location: Iowa | Registered: 08 August 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
corey, I have a pair of Nikon 10x25's which I actually used when I was a hardcore 3-D archery nut (3 National Titles and 1 World Wink)but, I have taken them with me to the stand a lot when hunting a spot that I wasn't gonna have a long way to look at anything, and it was a bit of a hike in, so I was trying to go light so to speak. I could tell a difference at the last few minutes of light between them and my 10x42's, which are Leica's--so it may be the bino itself that was better optically, not just the bigger objectives.

For me, in the woodlands deer hunting situations, where I won't be glassing past a couple hundred yards at max, they work fine, but if I had to ditch one set, they would go before my 10x42's.
 
Posts: 3563 | Location: GA, USA | Registered: 02 August 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have a sightron II 1.5 - 6 that I have had for quite a few years. It's been a great scope that has seen a lot of hard use with no problems. I've looked at their bino's and they looked pretty good for the money. If I didn't just buy a pair of olympus binos I would probably buy the sightrons.
 
Posts: 509 | Location: Flathead county Montana | Registered: 28 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've got a pair of Sightron S-II 10x50's.They are very clear and I would think the 10x42's would be too.
 
Posts: 359 | Location: Corpus Christi,Texas | Registered: 19 April 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Since owning my first Sightron scope a couple of years ago I have never purchased another Leupold. Can't vouch for their bino's but would think if the scopes are good they would be as well.


My biggest fear is when I die my wife will sell my guns for what I told her they cost.
 
Posts: 6654 | Location: Wasilla, Alaska | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jpat
posted Hide Post
I have 3 sightron scopes now. Great glass, very precise ajustments. I'm sure their binoculars are just as good.
 
Posts: 447 | Location: NH | Registered: 09 May 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ar corey:
Would these be a good hunting bino.?

They weigh only 12.6 oz. I do not like a heavy burden on neck while walking all day.

The full size 10 X 42 are 2 pounds.(29 oz)



Whatever you get, be sure to add a bino harness and the weight won't make any difference, I've been using them for years and the difference is amazing, they put the weight on your shoulders, not your neck. My Nikon Monarch weighs about 25oz and I sometimes forget I'm even wearing them! Try em, you'll appreciate them.

http://www.cabelas.com/cabelas...earch-box.jsp.form23
 
Posts: 1615 | Location: Washington State | Registered: 27 May 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wrongtarget:
quote:
Originally posted by ar corey:
Would these be a good hunting bino.?

They weigh only 12.6 oz. I do not like a heavy burden on neck while walking all day.

The full size 10 X 42 are 2 pounds.(29 oz)



Whatever you get, be sure to add a bino harness and the weight won't make any difference, I've been using them for years and the difference is amazing, they put the weight on your shoulders, not your neck. My Nikon Monarch weighs about 25oz and I sometimes forget I'm even wearing them! Try em, you'll appreciate them.

http://www.cabelas.com/cabelas...earch-box.jsp.form23


Thanks! Learn something every day.
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Tyler Kemp
posted Hide Post
Well, I love their scopes. Specifically the SIII series. I would assume their higher end bino's would be good as well.


Love shooting precision and long range. Big bores too!

Recent college grad, started a company called MK Machining where I'm developing a bullpup rifle chassis system.

 
Posts: 2598 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 29 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
There are lots of good posts on Binoes over on 24 HR campfire.
After reading them I have come to the conclusion the compact binoculers are not very good at any price.
Consider getting one of the new harnesses that distribute the weight better.
I use 10X42 Nikkon ATBs. I like them prety well, but i really want some 15X50s
...tj3006


freedom1st
 
Posts: 2450 | Registered: 09 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The Sightron scopes I own have been very good, wouldn't hesitate to buy their binos Have recommended their cheap porros to folks on a tight budget. But every binocular I have except the little pocket safari's have the harness attached. It makes a big difference not having anything swaying loose and you really can forget you have them on sometimes. Of course you can forget you took them off too.
 
Posts: 299 | Location: California | Registered: 10 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of CoyoteKiller82
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by specneeds:
The Sightron scopes I own have been very good, wouldn't hesitate to buy their binos Have recommended their cheap porros to folks on a tight budget. But every binocular I have except the little pocket safari's have the harness attached. It makes a big difference not having anything swaying loose and you really can forget you have them on sometimes. Of course you can forget you took them off too.


I agree, having purchased a bino harness this spring, it is much better carrying bino's, even 8x42 Nikon Monarchs all day.
 
Posts: 504 | Location: Manitoba, Canada | Registered: 03 December 2007Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia