one of us
| CraigP,
Good post Craig as you state what your battery is and what your hunting now. For what your doing you already have everything covered of course.
So perhaps you might consider other types of shooting. You don't have an ideal varmint rifle or target rifle.
What are the specifics of your FN action? I have seen some without CRF even! Is it a large ring or small? |
| |
one of us
| if you don't mind a little overlap with your 257, i would build exactly what I'M presently building. i have a 98/22 action and the lothar walther barrel in 6.5x57 should be here any day. i chose the 6.5x57 because...1) it's different...2)and it needs minimun if any feed rail and bolt face work. also(3) i can get bullets a lot heavier than the 25 cal family of bullets. since you already have about everything covered, just pick whatever seems the most fun...that's what i did. good luck with your project...bud |
| Posts: 1213 | Location: new braunfels, tx | Registered: 04 December 2001 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| |
| Posts: 655 | Location: South Texas | Registered: 11 January 2004 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Craig Craig no wonder you are having a hard time, you have taken a few bad roads. You need change your battery up. Keep the 257, the 270, and the 30-06... turn the 416 taylor into a 404, skip the 375/338 and turn that into a 35 wheelen, and use the FN for a 375 H&H if you can. Now your set and have plenty of work set out for you. |
| Posts: 2045 | Location: West most midwestern town. | Registered: 13 June 2001 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Nice rpoblem to have I would go for the 275 Rigby. It is classic and comfertable to shoot. Cheers, Andr� |
| Posts: 2293 | Location: The Kingdom of Denmark | Registered: 13 January 2004 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| If all else fails...
Write 6.0, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8.0, 9.0 (35 cal), and 9.3 on slips of paper. Put in one hat. Then write lengths from 55mm to 62 or 64 on slips of paper. Then draw one from each!
Just imagine, 6.5x62 or a 9.3x55! |
| Posts: 510 | Location: North Carolina, USA | Registered: 27 August 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| You have NO gaps and that dang 375 Taylor covers that 338 to 416 gap too well. A 338 winnie is never wrong, and would give you a lot of Taylor brass to play with. |
| |
one of us
| It does look like you don't really need to fill gaps there, the 338 is a great choice, a Whelen is always a great cartridge. What are the regulations there on hunting minimum calibers? what about a 224 clark (7x57 necked down), you could push 85grain pills in it and have a long range rig, is it flat and open where you hunt?
The 275 Rigby is something I want some day. I would have to do it with an octagon barrel though, it just seems right that way. With the 270 though you really don't need it (not that you have to need it, but I know I like to look at "needs" before doing "just for funs". maybe you look at it that way too).
The 375 Taylor with the 416 is a great higher end combo, but the 30-375 gap is the most noticeable in your lineup. You could fill it, or go bigger. hmmmm.....you have a hard choice.
Red |
| Posts: 4742 | Location: Fresno, CA | Registered: 21 March 2003 |
IP
|
|
Moderator
| 35 whelen, everybody needs one Another option not mentioned, and since you plan to use LW barrels is the 500 Jeffrey. You definately need something on the bigger end |
| |
one of us
| Guys,
Thank for the great advice. Fredj338 hit the nail on the head when he said this gun was going to be for fun. I do have all my bases covered with the 30-06 and 416 Taylor. The guns I listed in the original post are my primary rifles, meaning the ones I carry and shoot most. I do own others such as a 220 Swift, 25-06, 7mm Mag, 30-30 and my shotguns. Most of these rifles were my fathers so there is absolutely no chance of me getting rid of any of them. I have pretty much decided to build the 9.3x62 for no other reason than I want one and I think it would be fun to shoot, hunt with and load for. Of course a guy at work thinks I'm nuts for wanting a 9.3x62, as he doesn't think its a classic. This is the same guy that made his own classic rifle....he took a mauser action and color case hardened it, used a helically fluted barrel in 300 win mag, and had it stocked in a laminated thumbhole stock. Yeah...that gun is a real classic. As you can see I don't take alot of stock in his opinion. Anyway, I appreciate evryone's input and I'll let you know how the project comes along.
Craig |
| Posts: 530 | Location: Kulpmont, PA | Registered: 31 December 2000 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Quote:
Of course a guy at work thinks I'm nuts for wanting a 9.3x62, as he doesn't think its a classic.
Not a classic??? We beg to differ! - mike |
| Posts: 6653 | Location: Switzerland | Registered: 11 March 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Mike,
I am with you. Just look at what he built. This guy also says he ahs a H&H Double Rifle in 375 H&H that is thinks is worth over $150,000. He told me he has turned down $125,000 for it. This for a gun he paid $10,000 for a few years ago.
Craig |
| Posts: 530 | Location: Kulpmont, PA | Registered: 31 December 2000 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Quote:
mauser action and color case hardened it, used a helically fluted barrel in 300 win mag, and had it stocked in a laminated thumbhole stock.
Sounds like a nice rifle! |
| Posts: 3097 | Location: Louisiana | Registered: 28 November 2001 |
IP
|
|
Moderator
| Quote:
(sic) This is the same guy that made his own classic rifle....he took a mauser action and color case hardened it, used a helically fluted barrel in 300 win mag, and had it stocked in a laminated thumbhole stock. Yeah...that gun is a real classic. (sic)
Craig
I've heard of pimp guns before, but that one takes the cake. Reminds me of one my favorite quotes from my mother in law, "You can't buy taste".
I think the 9.3X62 is a fine choice, and one of these days will have to build/buy one for myself. |
| |
one of us
| I would make a suggestion for the .35 Whelen. It would seem to fit into your current battery quite nicely. I have one and it is my favorite rifle. Although I do like my .257 Rbts as well. |
| Posts: 214 | Location: Nebraska | Registered: 23 December 2003 |
IP
|
|