THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
rws h-mantel bullets
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
Hi is anyone using any rws h-mantel bullets?
I just got some in 9.3mm 258gr and was wondering what peoples opinion's where are they a controled expansion type of bullet or more explosive? are they suitable in a 9.3x62 for samber deer?
 
Posts: 249 | Location: Australia | Registered: 13 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The question has been addressed here various times. Generally speaking, the old H-Mantel is nowadays held in low esteem in its motherland, and in fact RWS/RUAG have discontinued it for this very reason and substituted it by the new DK bullet.

The first part of the bullet disintegrates rapidly, sometimes with significant meat damage (edited addition: see also Johan's comment below). The second half is supposed to penetrate, but not always does so, since the H-Mantel is not a real partition bullet (such as Nosler partition, Blaser/RUAG CDP, Swift, and also the new DK). Deflection of the second part within the body of the game is often very significant.

Not knowing about Samber deer, I cannot give any recommendation thereupon.

Regards,
Carcano

[ 09-16-2003, 21:59: Message edited by: carcano91 ]
 
Posts: 2452 | Location: Old Europe | Registered: 23 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Thanks Carcano I tried searching but must have used the wrong wording will have to try again
 
Posts: 249 | Location: Australia | Registered: 13 July 2003Reply With Quote
<eldeguello>
posted
Carcano has summarized it. This bullet's design is based on the same concept as the Nosler Partition, maybe the other way around, actually, because the H-mantel is a lot older bullet design(a Brenneke design, I think??). However the Nosler has a much tougher wall in the middle, (the H-mantel being made by folding the jacket material into a partition), so the Nosler holds together better at high impact velocities. The Nosler therefore penetrates better than the H-mantel. [Wink]
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Eldeguello: please allow me to disagree with all due respect, if I may. The present Nosler partition is a *very* different bullet from its same-named ancestor, and cannot be compared.

The H-Mantel has a few similarities with the primeval Nosler, but not with what most hunters today associate when they write (and think of) "Nosler Partition".

I'll check who developed the H-Mantel and when. It was probaby Lampel, but certainly *not* old Wilhelm Brenneke, who was a fierce competitor against RWS.

Carcano
 
Posts: 2452 | Location: Old Europe | Registered: 23 June 2001Reply With Quote
<JOHAN>
posted
My experince is shrapnel bombs..

I would think that the TIG, TUG or TOG is much better suited for the task than the H mantel.

/ JOHAN
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Yeah, in the old original nosler partition, the partition had a small gap in the center which could let the bullet continue to expand on past it. Sambar are like smallest bull elk aren't they or like a big red deer?
 
Posts: 174 | Location: texas | Registered: 14 July 2003Reply With Quote
<eldeguello>
posted
quote:
Yeah, in the old original nosler partition, the partition had a small gap in the center which could let the bullet continue to expand on past it.
Yes, the OLD NPJ has a hole in the wall between the cores, BUT, the ONLY TWO of these old type bullets I ever found inside an animal, a .270/150 and a 7mm/160, both of which I still have, show NO INDICATION of expanding beyond the partition. I have been using Noslers for 40 years, and have had only two of them ever stay inside an animal! The rest went through. I still have a lot of the old style 7mm 160's and .375 270's and have no reservations whatever about shooting big animals with them.

The new-style Partitions are a lot prettier, but that's all! The reason Nosler changed to the swaged/extuded gilding metal type was because they are cheaper and easier to make than the old ones turned on automatic screw machines, and are perhaps a little more accurate, not because the old design was not up to its' performance tasks!

I certainly would not argue with Carcano about who invented the H-Mantel bullet.

[ 09-18-2003, 19:15: Message edited by: eldeguello ]
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Eldeguello:

I did look it up now, in the two German bullet books. According to Manfred Rosenberger, who really knows his stuff, the H-Mantel was invented in the 1930s by Walter Lampel, to compete with Brenneke's bullets. Norbert Klups (who however does not always know his stuff ;-)) gives 1933 as the year of introduction.

Initially, it was produced with lead point, open hollow point and jacketed hollow point. The remainders today (the bullet is being phased out) only bear jacketed hollow points.

Carcano
 
Posts: 2452 | Location: Old Europe | Registered: 23 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Smlekid:
I hunted four red deers with my first 9,3x62 (Mannlincher Schoena�er 1952 - 24" barrel) with reloads with RWS H-Mantel 258 grs (2.350 fts).
Four shots, four kills. From 60 to 250 mts. In my opinion, excellent bullet in the hunt field.
H�ctor
 
Posts: 328 | Location: San Martin de los Andes, Argentina | Registered: 01 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
If you do a check in the African forum I posted some results from an 8X68 and H mantel bullets I used in Namibia last month. All in all it worked well, but the one that failed was eye opening!
 
Posts: 941 | Location: VT | Registered: 17 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
TSJ:
what had you described here
http://www.nookhill.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=008199
is *typical* for H-Mantel bullets. One need not be surprised.

Oh, by the way: it's not a "premium bullet". No way. Not even the manufacturer calls it so.

I already commented in the thread.

Carcano
 
Posts: 2452 | Location: Old Europe | Registered: 23 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Thanks all
 
Posts: 249 | Location: Australia | Registered: 13 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Thanks all I will probably use woodlieghs for the serious stuff the H-mantel were just to cheap to pass up they will be fine on our lighter game like pigs and goats
 
Posts: 249 | Location: Australia | Registered: 13 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Carcano 91
I would use H mantels again, but would avoid hitting any large bone as I certainly belive what you've said. On the kudu I neckshot, the bullet failed to exit after breaking, the admittingly hard, vertebrea.
 
Posts: 941 | Location: VT | Registered: 17 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
TSJ:
I may not like the H-Mantel, but it is certainly not a "bad" bullet as such (as was the old D-Mantel). But neither is the age-old "simple" long & heavy SPRN a bad solution.

Just give me a classic 215 grains .303 British, or a .318 WR, a .333 Jeffery, a heavy 8mm soft point round or flat nose - they will perform just fine in most circumstances.

Kynoch rulez ;-).

Carcano
 
Posts: 2452 | Location: Old Europe | Registered: 23 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Carcano 91
I dont know, or dont remember what the D-mantel was, can you tell me about it?
I like your choices myself, nothing wrong with a standard bullet as long as the velocity isnt to high. Thats why the 45/70 worked so well, really, it killed faster then the 8x68,shots were close, bullet was slow. 350 grn Hornady@ 2000 fps.
 
Posts: 941 | Location: VT | Registered: 17 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Dear TSJ:
the D-Mantel was another invention of the 1930s, and astonishingly was still produced up to 1974 or so. Even though an explanation belongs more into the field of history, it might spare some unsuspecting reader the possibly disastrous field experience, which could arise out of finding a dusty box of "RWS D-Mantel" on the shelf of an old gunshop, and buying it because of the promising RWS name and the rare opportunity of finding German ammo for a specific metric cartridge...

The D-Mantel was also nicknamed "the jacketed shrapnel". While not really a shrapnel or canister load in a *technical* sense (such as the italian riot loads for the 6,5x52 Carcano), it was a disintegration bullet. As such it worked: giving rapid disintegration and big meat damage, mostly lacking penetration, rarely having exit wounds, and often yielding long tracking searches.

As recent employ of the same principle for a very limited (and tailored) use is A-Square's "lion load".

Regards,
Carcano

[ 09-21-2003, 19:59: Message edited by: carcano91 ]
 
Posts: 2452 | Location: Old Europe | Registered: 23 June 2001Reply With Quote
<eldeguello>
posted
Carcano- Thanks for the info on the various "Mantel" bullets!! [Wink]
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
smlekid,

Was it you who bought up O'Reiley Sport's supply of these bullets? I just read their ad in the last Austtralian Shooter, called to buy some but they're all gone [Frown]

Good luck with them. Let us know how they perform.
 
Posts: 1210 | Location: Zurich | Registered: 02 January 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
/
 
Posts: 7857 | Registered: 16 August 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Stu c the H-mantel I have did come from O'riely's in Melbourne they are the bronze pointed type I will load some up for our smal game like goats and let people know how they perform
 
Posts: 249 | Location: Australia | Registered: 13 July 2003Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia