.308win 16.5" barrel velocities are surprising....
http://www.realguns.com/archives/181.htm ..

28 June 2015, 17:30
scottfromdallasThat is extremely surprising. It's the only article I've seen like that. Generally others have seen 50-100 fps loss with 150 grain bullets and more as the bullets get heavier. Seems like there is minimal loss with 150s.
29 June 2015, 21:09
larrysYah, check his caveats. All of his Re15 loads are over max in all of the books I have. The 150 load by a full 2 grains. The only book that I recall loading that high is an OLD Speer book.
his 200gn load is 3 grains below Hodgdon mAx. with W748
This guy shows 200gn, 40gn -W748 for 2396mv (16.5" barrel)
HODGDON shows 200gn,43gn -W748 for 2435mv(24" barrel)
01 July 2015, 16:29
900 SSI think he needs to rerun his tests to find out where the magic comes from.
06 July 2015, 02:51
AtkinsonThe .308 with a 16.5 inch barrel has to be loaded hot to compete with a 300 SAVAGE with about every load I have tested on my chronograph..and best to shoot only 125 to 150 gr. loads IMO...
I traded for a neat little Savage 99F in .308 that had a 16-1/4" barrel some years back, and it was a nice saddle gun, and I really liked it, but didn't show me much more than a 30-30 with most loads, so I traded it off for a 99F with an original 22 inch barrel, still got that one.
In all fairness to the .308 caliber, I don't shoot the 99 Savage at max loadings, usually about a grain or two below book max, its saves brass and stays locked up when firing that way! depending on the powder however..