THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Page 1 2 3 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
energy
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
Roll EyesI have followed this thread rather closely, and after having had this wisdom put into good order, how does one put all this valuable information to practical use? beer roger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bartsche:
Roll EyesI have followed this thread rather closely, and after having had this wisdom put into good order, how does one put all this valuable information to practical use? beer roger



Good question, the average person doesn't

tu2


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of someoldguy
posted Hide Post
quote:
You took one example that benefited your model. The question is this accurate 100% of the time. Also how do we know that this is what we will find when we fire the bullet. Has any of this been proven? The only proven model that works 100% of the time that I am aware of is MacPhearson's


One example????
You're just arguing for the sake of arguing, aren't you?
Enough already!


_________________________

Glenn

 
Posts: 942 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 16 July 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of someoldguy
posted Hide Post
quote:
I have followed this thread rather closely, and after having had this wisdom put into good order, how does one put all this valuable information to practical use?


Ha!
One doesn't, that's how.
For me, it all started when eny asked the question "What does energy mean to you?" and I set out to answer it from my perspective, according to what I have learned. It's just my observation. For the average forum member, it doesn't have to mean anything more than that. Or even for the above average forum member or the below average forum member. Or for the smart member, dumb member and everything else in between. It's just for those who might find it interesting, for whatever reason.


_________________________

Glenn

 
Posts: 942 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 16 July 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of someoldguy
posted Hide Post
quote:
I thought so. My hero "alf" used to bring it up in nearly every thread he posted to.

For people who have first-hand experience of seeing how both people and Game react to shots taken, there is simply ZERO comparison. The Freedom Freeloaders of the world will never understand it though because they have no comparison base and are unable/unwilling to learn from those that do have it.


No doubt the work of Duncan McPherson was/is important. His qualifications and knowledge base is impressive to say the least.
I just find it perplexing and puzzling as to why someone would apparently think that what little I've discussed and shown here would pose a challenge to his work. I mean, gee whiz!


_________________________

Glenn

 
Posts: 942 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 16 July 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Red C.
posted Hide Post
I got in on this late, but as I see it energy and velocity are simply a measurements--of course they are related--there is a direct correlation between velocity and energy. By themselves they are not as valuable as when using them for comparisons. For example, the muzzle energy of a .243 shooting a 100 grain bullet is almost the same as a .30-30 shooting a 150 grain bullet. So, does that mean the .30-30 and the .243 are equals when it comes to, say, deer hunting? NO! Now, compare their energy at 200 yards: The .243 has an energy of 1332 ft lbs while the .30-30 only has 858 ft lbs. Which would you rather hunt deer with if there is a good possibility that you'll get a shot at 200 yds.

The lowly energy measurement is a simple, quick way of comparing the ability of a .243 and .30-30 to kill a deer at 200 yards. Is it the best comparison measurement? I doubt it, but it does help me.


Red C.
Everything I say is fully substantiated by my own opinion.
 
Posts: 909 | Location: SE Oklahoma | Registered: 18 January 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bartsche:
Roll EyesI have followed this thread rather closely, and after having had this wisdom put into good order, how does one put all this valuable information to practical use? beer roger
Go back to the First post Vapo made on Page 1. Then do a total Mental Erase of the rest - especially the part about Human Wound Studies. Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by someoldguy:
quote:
You took one example that benefited your model. The question is this accurate 100% of the time. Also how do we know that this is what we will find when we fire the bullet. Has any of this been proven? The only proven model that works 100% of the time that I am aware of is MacPhearson's


One example????
You're just arguing for the sake of arguing, aren't you?
Enough already!



Nope not at all. Have you read MacPhearsons work? In some media such as armor "energy" is important to the calculation, but as he explans not in tissuse or ballistics geleitin.

The higher the sectional density the lower the drag


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Wstrnhuntr
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jwp475:
quote:
Originally posted by Ackley Improved User:
quote:
Originally posted by Wstrnhuntr:
The less energy your weapon has, the more relevant energy becomes..


This is the most insightfull post on this thread! Brilliant.


I'd call BS on this statement. In the example that of the 22 caliber 55 grain bullet at 3600 FPS it has more FPE than a 45 caliber bullet at 1400 FPS, but will be much less effective with a shoulder shot on a mature Bison yet the 45 call bullet will break the shoulder and continue through the vitails.


bsflag Right back at ya.

In a nutshell, it depends on the said 45 caliber bullet. (and the 22 slug as well.) With a 300 grain bullet, maybe, but youd better be at point blank with that shoulder shot and even that is on shaky grounds at best. Which begs the question, could the 22 cal penetrate said shoulder at point blank with a fmj? Confused Hmm..

The 22 cal bullet will generate 1582 ftlbs while a 300 gn 45 will make less. A bit over 1300 ft lbs. However, a 500 gn slug, which will certianly get the job done produces 2195 ft lbs of energy.. Considerably more than the varmint load.

And the biggest difference is that the 500 gn slug will retain its "energy" against the resistance of the shoulder where the itty bity 55 grainer falls flat.

However, having said all that. Your point about the exception of 220 swift type of "energy" is well taken. In most other cases the general rules of thumb apply..

The way I see it, the usage of ft lbs as a guideline for applicable rounds for specific species was very relevant when there were a plethora of rather anemic rounds on the market. Nowadays such anemic rounds are not so common, so it doesnt matter so much.

Actualy your example of a 45 cal on a Bison shoulder is a good example of the question of energy relevance and how much is enough. We could go back and forth on that one alone all day long. But the proof is in the pudding..



AK-47
The only Communist Idea that Liberals don't like.
 
Posts: 10188 | Location: Tooele, Ut | Registered: 27 September 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Wstrnhuntr:
quote:
Originally posted by jwp475:
quote:
Originally posted by Ackley Improved User:
quote:
Originally posted by Wstrnhuntr:
The less energy your weapon has, the more relevant energy becomes..


This is the most insightfull post on this thread! Brilliant.


I'd call BS on this statement. In the example that of the 22 caliber 55 grain bullet at 3600 FPS it has more FPE than a 45 caliber bullet at 1400 FPS, but will be much less effective with a shoulder shot on a mature Bison yet the 45 call bullet will break the shoulder and continue through the vitails.


bsflag Right back at ya.

In a nutshell, it depends on the said 45 caliber bullet. With a 300 grain bullet, maybe, but youd better be at point blank with that shoulder shot and even that is on shaky grounds at best. Which begs the question, could the 22 cal penetrate said shoulder at point blank with a fmj? Confused Hmm..

The 22 cal bullet wil generate 1582 ftlbs while a 300 gn 45 will make less. A bit over 1300 ft lbs. However, a 500 gn slug, which will certianly get the job done produces 2195 ft lbs of energy.. Considerably more than the varmint load.

And the biggest difference is that the 500 gn slug will retain its "energy" against the resistance of the shoulder where the itty bity 55 grainer falls flat.

However, having said all that. Your point about the exception of 220 swift type of "energy" is well taken. In most other cases the general rules of thumb apply..

The way I see it, the usage of ft lbs as a guideline for applicable rounds for specific species was very relevant when there were a plethora of rather anemic rounds on the market. Nowadays such anemic rounds are not so common, so it doesnt matter so much.

Actualy your example of a 45 cal on a Bison shoulder is a good example of the question of energy relevance and how much is enough. We could go back and forth on that one alone all day long. But the proof is in the pudding..


Ah, I left out the 45 cal bullet weight which is 360 grain.
More like how much momentum is left


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Wstrnhuntr
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jwp475:
[ More like how much momentum is left



When a bullet fragments, so does the energy.



AK-47
The only Communist Idea that Liberals don't like.
 
Posts: 10188 | Location: Tooele, Ut | Registered: 27 September 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Wstrnhuntr:
quote:
Originally posted by jwp475:
[ More like how much momentum is left



When a bullet fragments, so does the energy.



So does the momentum, that's why we don't shoot larhe game with #9 shot. But by all means make them both NON Fragmenting


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of someoldguy
posted Hide Post
quote:
You took one example that benefited your model. The question is this accurate 100% of the time. Also how do we know that this is what we will find when we fire the bullet. Has any of this been proven?


To expand upon what I said: It's like stating that 2+9 = 11 and saying that it therefore can't be 5+6. Yes, what I posted works (to borrow a phrase) 100 percent of the time because it's simple math and physics principles involved. I could give another example or a thousand examples, or you could give me examples, but what's the point? Your mind is already made up that I'm wrong and nothing I can do will change it. And guess what? I frankly don't care!


_________________________

Glenn

 
Posts: 942 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 16 July 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by someoldguy:
quote:
You took one example that benefited your model. The question is this accurate 100% of the time. Also how do we know that this is what we will find when we fire the bullet. Has any of this been proven?


To expand upon what I said: It's like stating that 2+9 = 11 and saying that it therefore can't be 5+6. Yes, what I posted works (to borrow a phrase) 100 percent of the time because it's simple math and physics principles involved. I could give another example or a thousand examples, or you could give me examples, but what's the point? Your mind is already made up that I'm wrong and nothing I can do will change it. And guess what? I frankly don't care!



Does it work 100% of the time in tissue. I beleive we are talking about hunting and shooting biological beings. Yes "energy" is used to calculate penetration through some media, such as military armor, but not tissue and that is my point


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia