Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
I have had a few Savage 99's through the years and they are really neat guns. I just rebarrelled one of my takedowns with a new Savage barrel that I snagged off of EBay. The original barrel was a featherweight in 22 HiPower that had been rebored and rechambered by P.O. Ackley to 6mm 30/30AI. I got tired of the hassels of forming brass and I am not a big 6mm fan, so when a new, unused 303 barrel came up, I got it($225) screwed it in, and, amazingly, it indexed and headspaced. Now that I have a new toy, I got to thinking about how to modernize it just a bit. I had a 303S previously and still had several boxes of Silvertip 190 grain loads. These were quite effective on whitetails, but the B.C. of that punkin ball silvertip has to be about like 45acp ball, it is that blunt! Since Savage never made a tubular fed rifle, you have to wonder why they never used a spitzer bullet, but in 1895 and being in competition with the 30/30, I guess it was to be expected. The old 303 190gr. was well respected for its deep penetration on larger game. I am certainly not going to magnumize it in any way, but bullet technology has come a long way since then. To try to duplicate the penetration abilities of the original load, since 190 gr. cup/core bullets are not readily available, the Nosler 170 partition would seem to be the better replacement choice. The other thought would be to drop down to a 150 gr, spitzer partition with its superior B.C. and approximately 200 fps advantage which might balance penetration and extend the working range out to 200yds or a bit more. This is not a need to project, just trying to see what could have been possible if Savage had ever tried to update the ballistic effectivness of the old cartridge. Should be fun! DRSS(We Band of Bubba's Div.) N.R.A (Life) T.S.R.A (Life) D.S.C. | ||
|
One of Us |
You're breaking my heart. As a young boy, I had a Savage 99 in .303 Savage. I sold it for a pittance many decades ago. I now have a 99F in .300 Savage, which is nice, but now that I'm older and wiser, I'm brought to tears at my youthful stupidity. I had a .303 Savage, and I virtually gave it away . . . | |||
|
One of Us |
I reach for a .303 1899H takedown more often than not for a day of deer hunting. I went the other direction for bullets. My pet load is a 190 grain flat nose cast bullet , cast soft (10-12bhn) and propelled by 28gr. 3031. It has proven to be big medicine for white tails. I have always been leery of how .30 bullets intended for much higher velocities would perform out of the old slow poke .303, but if paper punching were all it would be called upon for... | |||
|
One of Us |
gnoahh...that is just about a duplicate of my 303S load!! The only double I ever scored on coyotes was with that old 1899 Savage and that same load made them both really, really permanently sick. I haven't used it in years and it goes to auction in October....kinda hate to see it go but there are other itches that need scratching. DRSS: E. M. Reilley 500 BPE E. Goldmann in Erfurt, 11.15 X 60R Those who fail to study history are condemned to repeat it | |||
|
one of us |
Great thread gentlemen. I am stuck with a 99 in .300 Savage as well, but always wanted an old .303, preferably with octagon barrel. There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t. – John Green, author | |||
|
One of Us |
I may, at some time try a cast bullet in this rifle. Gnoahh, which mold are you using and is it a gas check? As to modern bullets, the 170 gr.partition is designed for the 30/30 so no issues there. The idea of trying the 150 gr. partition is based on that the front of partitions are generally more fragile and should set up some at the lower velocities within the range limitations of the 303 while the rear of the bullet would give it the legendary penetration, that is my theory anyway! While I have no intention of hot loading the cartridge, the rifle has a 24" barrel and I believe it would be possible to attain 23-2400 fps with the 150 gr in a reasonable load. I had hoped that others on here were using these old guns and would give some feedback like is happening! You have to admit, if you show up in deer camp with a 303S you will be the only one. I have found the first problem is limited magazine length, which also limits spitzers to lighter and preferably, flat base bullets for their shorter length. I bought some PRVI brass from Graffs which appears to be good brass at a reasonable enough price for an obsolete chambering. I am starting out with H4895 but would love to find some Hodgon Leverevolution as it was formulated for lever guns with gains of over 100 fps over traditional powders. Any suggestions appreciated! DRSS(We Band of Bubba's Div.) N.R.A (Life) T.S.R.A (Life) D.S.C. | |||
|
One of Us |
The 190 grain bullet I use is a custom one-off from Saeco 30+ years ago. Wide flat meplat, .301 diameter bore-riding nose, .310 across the drive bands, gas check. I can't begin to imagine how many bullets I have cast with that mould. I too have heard good things about Leverevolution and mean to try it some day, but frankly the old 'standards' serve me well and that day may never arrive! PRVI .303 Savage brass is good stuff, which fortuitous as it's the only game in town. Don't feel you need to make a speed demon out of the .303. My bullets start out around 18-1900fps out of that 20" barrel and brass lasts forever. (Which is about what the old 190 jacketed factory load generated in real life out of these carbines.) Where I hunt, a 100 yard shot is almost unheard of, so the load suits me to a "T". The pictured rifle slops them into an honest 1½-2" @ 100yds, and is a true joy to carry all day in the deer woods- no sling, it stays in my hands not on my shoulder. If you really want to get some odd looks at deer camp, try showing up with a Savage carbine in .22 High Power... | |||
|
One of Us |
..Well Bill We do share a same interest...However I would take a 1895 Savage in .303 ofcouse with oct barrel, knifeblade front sights etc. Don´t go hogwild on this page.. http://milpas.cc/rifles/ZFiles...caliber%20rifle..htm DRSS: HQ Scandinavia. Chapters in Sweden & Norway | |||
|
One of Us |
Lee- good to see you taking the 303 to a new level. Not to hijack the thread, but what's wrong with the 300 Sav? I once had an Arisaka re-chambered .300 and loved it. Wish I still had it Doug Wilhelmi NRA Life Member | |||
|
One of Us |
Nothing wrong with the .300 Savage. It just fits into a different niche, that's all. In a 6 pound carbine, the .300 will beat on you a lot more than a .303 or .30-30 will, making the .303 more desirable to me. Besides, my favorite 1899s are from the pre-WWI era and the .300 didn't come out 'til 1920. | |||
|
one of us |
Jens, nice link, and thank you. There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t. – John Green, author | |||
|
One of Us |
Well, I got a surprise today! I went to my local gun store which has about as many empty spots on the shelves for powder and bullets as they do full ones. Lo and behold I find 2 LBS of leverrevolution, which I bought. I also picked up some 150 gr. partitions. Now, one thing for sure is that 99's have short mags, to seat the partitions deep enough to fit they are far enough up the ogive(?) that they have a gap between bullet and case mouth. I have a few Speer Mag tip 150's that are still .306 at the mouth when seated deep, so they will work better. At least with the long neck of the 303, you are not taking up any powder space. I have loaded a few starters with the new powder and hope to get out to the range on sunday, but we have been having some wet weather lately with more on the way. I can see now that this is not going to be as straightforward as I thought, but hopefully some usefull info will come out of it. I'd better check the battery in the chronograph! DRSS(We Band of Bubba's Div.) N.R.A (Life) T.S.R.A (Life) D.S.C. | |||
|
one of us |
Lee I have loaded 150 gr spitzers in a friends old 303 Sav. Many of the 150 spitzers have too long of an ogive and they have to bee seated so deep to fit the magazine that you have a gap at the top of the neck.Rem 150 gr corelocts will just fit but the 150 gr Speer spitzers are about as short as you can find. I have tried 3031 and 4895 powders. Both worked well. Hope that helps. | |||
|
One of Us |
Snowman, thanks for the info! It pretty much backs up what I am finding. Since you mention it, I need to dig around in the reloading room as I am sure I have a stash of 150 Core-Locts in there. I have loaded some with 4895 but hope to see how the leverevolution works tommorow. DRSS(We Band of Bubba's Div.) N.R.A (Life) T.S.R.A (Life) D.S.C. | |||
|
One of Us |
Well, time for an update. I made it to the range today with six rifles that needed to be sighted in, so I was limited on time. I had some loads with the Leverevolution and 150 gr. speers. I loaded them with a starting load of 34.0 gr. These loads chrono'd at a leisurely 1906 fps! I was conservative with the starting load as the bullets had to be seated deeply, also the Prvi brass is about 20 gr. heavier than the Winchester brass that I had. I went on Hodgens website which has more of a range of loads(in 30/30) . Next trip to the range I believe I will pack along a press and powder scale so I can get to the power/pressure range I need and see what kind of results I get. DRSS(We Band of Bubba's Div.) N.R.A (Life) T.S.R.A (Life) D.S.C. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia