THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
8mm-06 AI or 338-06
 Login/Join
 
<9.3x62>
posted
I've got a PF model 70 action laying around, and I thought I'd barrel it up to one of these two rounds. I've got a Mcmillan stock to match.

I have limited to these two rounds, as I've got every other LA round I have even the mildest interest in, so these are the finalists. I've had 8mm-06s and 338-06s before, but never a 8mm-06 AI...

I'm thinking deer, caribou, and the occasional elk.

Thoughts?
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
338-06, based on a better bullet selection.

Otherwise, they're going to be virtually the same.

And, I could give two hoots about Ackley-anything, so it would be the "plain" version.
 
Posts: 2629 | Registered: 21 May 2002Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
I have a 338-06 barreled by Wiseman that is the most accurate rifle I own. Wit 60 gr 414 and a 225 Accubond it is always under 1/2 MOA and consistently under 3/8" at 200 yards with 4 shot groups.

I have a 338 Win Mag that stays in the rack when I hunt elk or nigai because I can't tell the difference and the 338-06 is twice as accurate.

The 8mm-06 is also one hell of a caliber but I have no experience in the 8mm-06 AI.
 
Posts: 7 | Registered: 03 December 2005Reply With Quote
<9.3x62>
posted
I normally have little to no interest in the AI, but I would be loading the 8mm-06 AI in '06 cases, and I am very averse to have improper headstamps on similar looking rounds. I know 8mm-06 brass is available, but it is very pricey. Easier to get the AI, and therefore remove any risk of mis-use. I've already tested AI cases in the action, and they feed perfectly...
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Tex21
posted Hide Post
Try the 8mm-06 AI. If you decide you don't like it, sell it and rebarrel to something else. I've been tempted myself; my gunsmith says good things about it and has tried to talk me into building one on more than one occasion...


Jason

"Chance favors the prepared mind."
 
Posts: 1449 | Location: Dallas, Texas | Registered: 24 February 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'm also inclined towards the 8mm/06AI. From 125gr Hornady through to a 250gr Woodleigh, with an FMJ 196gr for plinking. Sounds like a great project!
Cheers...
Con
 
Posts: 2198 | Location: Australia | Registered: 24 August 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 45otto
posted Hide Post
Ballistics are almost identicle so it's a matter of preference. Bullets for the .338 are more abundant. I am hoping that the .325WSM takes off so perhaps some bullet makers will expand their .32 cal line.


______________________


Are you gonna pull those pistols or whistle Dixie?
 
Posts: 439 | Location: Rosemount, MN | Registered: 07 October 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Nothing wrong with an 8mm; I have an 8x57 that I really like. BUT, given the choice between an 8mm-06 and a .338-06 I would take the .338-06 everytime.

With the exception of the 8mm 250 gr Woodleigh (and it's expensive!) there are no other 250 gr 8mm bullets that I'm aware of (well, maybe Hawk). The most common heavy 8mm bullets are 200 and 220 grains. There are plenty of 250 gr .338 bullets to choose from. Of course, I'm just a heavy bullet kind of guy, you may not be.

Here's how I think of them:

8mm-06 .323" 220 gr at 2400-2500 fps
.338-06 .338" 250 gr at 2400-2500 fps

For me the .338-06 would be the one.

-Bob F.
 
Posts: 3485 | Location: Houston, Texas | Registered: 22 February 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
the .338-06 wins hands down over the 8mm-06....or any other AI IMO...the 8MM-06 suffers from bullets selection.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Since you ask, I think that both the 8x64S and the 8,5x63 (why would you use imperial measurements anyhow?) are excellent cartridges, but the latter is more modernly designed, and more versatile.

Carcano


--
"Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither."

"Is the world less safe now than before you declared your Holy war? You bet!"
(DUK asking Americans, 14th June 2004)
 
Posts: 2452 | Location: Old Europe | Registered: 23 June 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Why not give the .338 Federal a try? Seems like a neat new cartridge if you want to be different.
 
Posts: 153 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 12 January 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia