08 March 2013, 05:12
ColoradoMattLatest Handloader magazine has 9.3x57 article and load data.
The latest Handloader magazine has 9.3x57 article and load data. Article by Gil Sengal. Shows how to make brass from 30-06. Thought I'd get the word out for those interested.
Matt
10 March 2013, 07:34
packrattusnongratusThanks Matt. I quit subscribing a few years ago.
Do you know what issue number?
Thanks.
11 March 2013, 01:01
D Humbargerquote:
Originally posted by z1r:
Do you know what issue number?
Thanks.
It's the current April issue. #283
11 April 2013, 03:29
MJinesCan someone post or email me a copy of this article . . . pretty please?
12 April 2013, 16:43
DresdenI bought the magazine and read the article, v ery interesting. I found a lot of suggested loads for my 9.3x57 using imr4895. 45 grains was usually listed as a good load with comments of up to 48 grains with no pressure signs. I thought the 45 gn load would work, I started at 41 gn and went up to 45gn. The gun seemed to perform at 44-45 gns, I felt like you were shooting a 286 gn bullet, but it would not regulate to the sights, it shot low at 25 yards, several inches low in fact. Any thoughts from 9.3x57 Husky shooters ?
16 April 2013, 02:28
gzig5quote:
Originally posted by Dresden:
I bought the magazine and read the article, v ery interesting. I found a lot of suggested loads for my 9.3x57 using imr4895. 45 grains was usually listed as a good load with comments of up to 48 grains with no pressure signs. I thought the 45 gn load would work, I started at 41 gn and went up to 45gn. The gun seemed to perform at 44-45 gns, I felt like you were shooting a 286 gn bullet, but it would not regulate to the sights, it shot low at 25 yards, several inches low in fact. Any thoughts from 9.3x57 Husky shooters ?
I'll have to look up the data but the little shooting I did with my 9.3x57 last year, the faster I pushed the 286, the closer to the sights the impact came, in elevation and windage. I think I ended up at 46gr H4895 and it still seemed quite mild.