The Accurate Reloading Forums
Re: 7 WSM Performed better than expected.......

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/3221043/m/536100411

02 June 2004, 04:22
SempreElk
Re: 7 WSM Performed better than expected.......
Nice Gun very impressive Groups and the velocities are pretty darn close to what the 270wsm will do with 130's . It is the most underrated of all the WSM's and comparing it to a 300 wsm is like comparing a 7 rem mag to a 300 win mag. Have/had them both and there is a recoil difference. No difference at all in killing power but more recoil.
03 June 2004, 05:31
GSP7
Nice post DJpaitles, Im just now getting interested in the WSM.

So you guys think the 300 wsm kicks alot more than the 7 wsm?



Do you know the mag. box length on that kimber?



What kind of recoil pad does kimber put on it? Is it adaquit?
03 June 2004, 09:13
fredj338
dj, I've been lloking into a WSM & I tthink you've found it for me.
03 June 2004, 07:12
Headache
GSP7,

The inside dimension of the Kimber magazine box is 3.040", and they come with a 1" Decelorator pad installed.

Good luck,
Headache
03 June 2004, 16:55
djpaintles
GSP7, I probably couldn't tell the difference in shooting any of the WSM side by side after a normal day at the range - which often includes a 458 Lott.
The little kimbers do seem to buck a bit but nothing like a lot of the other stuff I shoot a lot of. The recoil pad on them is excellent as is the stock design but they aren't creampuffs either. If you are recoil sensitive try a normal weight 270 it's still a great round.
The WSM's are just newer and fun to play with. Plus I love the Kimber 8400's because they have shot very well for me and fit me nearly perfectly.......DJ