THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Page 1 2 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Barnes bullet performance
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of 900 SS
posted Hide Post
From my experience, the behaviour of fragment penetration ends up somewhere in the gut, making a mess.
 
Posts: 408 | Location: Bardu, Norway | Registered: 25 August 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I am sitting on a mountain in Colorado Elk hunting in deep snow. It started off -22 that morning and the high was -2. I sat in my honey hole until 4:00 and suddenly there appears 20 Elk at 280 yards up the mountain, the biggest a 5X5 Bull. I am shooting a .340 Wby with 250 grain Barnes XLC, or if you know Barnes the old blue bullet. The speed of the reload around 2950 fps. I fire just behind the shoulder and when the snow settles from the muzzle break I see the huge 5X5 Bull standing with his opposite shoulder to me. I fire again just behind the shoulder and he flops down. After an hour of climbing to the Bull it was dark and I had a big job of gutting. I found two bullet holes from opposite sides within two inches of each other. I got the job done and left the Bull on the mountain with the body cavity spread as wide as possible filled with snow. The next day my son and a buddy brought the Bull down the mountain and showed me five blue coated petals off the bullets. He found 3 petals in the skin of one exit hole and 2 petals in the skin of the other exit hole on the opposite side. I considered the bullets performed perfectly, doing their job blowing through and shedding the petals at the last on the sides of the exit holes. I could picture the bullets burning, twisting and causing maximum damage all the way through the Bull, then blowing out and spraying blood and gore all over the snow beyond. Once again I felt the bullets performed their job perfectly. My son and our buddy were very impressed with the results. After reading this account you draw your own conclusions. Good shooting.


phurley
 
Posts: 2367 | Location: KY | Registered: 22 September 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
When it comes to bullet performance in live animals, you hope for the best, but with any bullet you may get a surprise now and then..Todays bullets are the best I have ever seen, and its been a long time since I have had or witnessed an out and out failure..Some so called failures are not failures at all, sometimes a lack of knowledge blames bullets for failing such as caliber size exit hole being the worst contender when in fact it may have caused all manor of internal destruction as the bullet came apart and seperated leaving only the base to exit...The H mantle that has a great long term reputation is designed to do exactly that.

Match bullet construction and velocity to the caliber and the game and you will seldom have a true failure, mayby never. If you use a monolithic HP, then use a lighter than normal weight such as in the 06, use a 150 monolithic as opposed to a 180 cup and core..Seems to always work..


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42210 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
"Some so called failures are not failures at all, sometimes a lack of knowledge blames bullets for failing such as caliber size exit hole being the worst contender when in fact it may have caused all manor of internal destruction as the bullet came apart and seperated leaving only the base to exit.."

Great point for sure!
 
Posts: 2664 | Location: Utah | Registered: 23 February 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ALF:

Here both the penetrator ( bullet) and target are likened to a fluid i.e. a fluid penetrating a fluid.



Absolutely. Bullets may be solid in form but they do indeed exhibit fluid behaviour.



quote:
Originally posted by 900 SS:
I dont think hydraulic force is needed to open TSX or similar bullets. If you shoot them into wood, across or along grain, they still open up like supposed to.


If fluid force is not needed in the nose cavity for HP monomental expansion, then what act of physics is responsible for the displacement of copper/formation of petals?

On HV impact,
Would not the parallel wall HP tip cavity be the higher pressure side - and the opposing curved surface[outer HP tip surface] be the lower pressure region?

The natural inclination then , would be for the copper to begin to move-displace in the direction of the lower pressure region.[path of least resistance]
(just think of how aircraft get lift-movement, through the wing)


quote:
Originally posted by 416Tanzan:

a monometal will not explode like frangible lead core bullets. They may bend but they will hold together.



A copper mono-metal shank remains ductile and simply deforms under high stress, but a brass mono-metal can break in half through the solid shank.

quote:
Originally posted by 416Tanzan:
a plastic tip would be better than a bronze tip due to light weight and malleabilty.
Still, there is always the possibility of closing a nose, whether monometal or lead-core bullets.


Id say save pointed add-on nose cones for things that really need them - like fighter jets,
and avoid them in objects like expanding HP bullets.
 
Posts: 9434 | Location: Here & There- | Registered: 14 May 2008Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia