THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    Shorty 25-06 what do you think ?

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Shorty 25-06 what do you think ?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of londonhunter
posted
Been offered a used Blaser standard barrel for £250 or USD 340 thereabouts

Been thinking about it and cannot quite get myself to commit

Just fancy something different other than the usual calibers 308 243 without being kicked around

The only thing that bugs me is the factory barrel length

Me think its a bit short to benefit from its full potential

So anybody shoots a shorty 25-06

Does it defeat having that long column of powder behind the bullet ?
 
Posts: 1661 | Location: London | Registered: 14 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
What is the barrel length?
 
Posts: 690 | Location: JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA | Registered: 17 January 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of londonhunter
posted Hide Post
58 cm .... homer
 
Posts: 1661 | Location: London | Registered: 14 February 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
For the metrically-challenged, that's about 22.83 inches.

I certainly prefer a longer barrel in a .25-06, but a barrel of nearly 23" won't be a big handicap with a .25-06. Put a moderator on it and enjoy.
 
Posts: 13257 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Ingvar J. Kristjansson
posted Hide Post
I just bought a barrel in 25-06 my for my Sauer 202 and it’s only 56cm. (22.04”). Comparing a 22” with a 24” barrel you will only lose about 50 feet/per sec. or so !! Nothing to worry about....(you will never notice the difference). My buddy has been using his 22” barrel in 25-06 for years and it’s fast, deadly and very accurate.
 
Posts: 510 | Location: Iceland | Registered: 15 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'd would not want a 25-06 with a barrel shorter than 24". I have two, one 24" the other a custom 26".


NRA Patron member
 
Posts: 2652 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: 08 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of londonhunter
posted Hide Post
You are exactly the person I would like to speak to

Does that extra few inches give you the speed to make the 25-06 shine ?
 
Posts: 1661 | Location: London | Registered: 14 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Ingvar J. Kristjansson
posted Hide Post
You will gain 25 feet/per sec. tops per inch that’s it...so........you do the math !!!
 
Posts: 510 | Location: Iceland | Registered: 15 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of londonhunter
posted Hide Post
Ingvar

I hear you loud And clear

I just want to hear from folks who has long barrels and their side of the story

I hope this is permissible on this forum
 
Posts: 1661 | Location: London | Registered: 14 February 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of hivelosity
posted Hide Post
BOOM I have two a parker hale with 24" and a Winchester with a 26" barrel. 120 and 100gr bullets that I use go almost to the same point of impact 100gr are about 1/2" low. @ 100 yrds the velocity's are with in a few feet.
the most noticeable result is the amount of muzzle blast. I think a shorter barrel may give out more.
Dave
 
Posts: 2134 | Location: Ohio | Registered: 26 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of chuck375
posted Hide Post
Might as well go with a 257 Roberts in that length. Classy cartridge too!


Regards,

Chuck



"There's a saying in prize fighting, everyone's got a plan until they get hit"

Michael Douglas "The Ghost And The Darkness"
 
Posts: 4796 | Location: Colorado Springs | Registered: 01 January 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
quote:
You will gain 25 feet/per sec. tops per inch that’s it...so........you do the math

I had a 26" that got rust in the tip of the barrel. Cut it back to 22". Depending on bullet lost between 90-130fps. Loaded to equal pressure a Roberts will be about 100fps lower.


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Dave Bush
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by chuck375:
Might as well go with a 257 Roberts in that length. Classy cartridge too!


+1 tu2


Dave
DRSS
Chapuis 9.3X74
Chapuis "Jungle" .375 FL
Krieghoff 500/.416 NE
Krieghoff 500 NE

"Git as close as y can laddie an then git ten yards closer"

"If the biggest, baddest animals on the planet are on the menu, and you'd rather pay a taxidermist than a mortician, consider the 500 NE as the last word in life insurance." Hornady Handbook of Cartridge Reloading (8th Edition).
 
Posts: 3728 | Location: Midwest | Registered: 26 November 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
To say you gain or loose a certain amount of velocity for every inch is like saying a 14 year old will only be so much faster than a 13 year old! Alas, kids and barrels are all different. Unless you are shooting more than 400 yards it really doesn't matter much anyway. If you like the rifle, get it.
 
Posts: 849 | Location: MN | Registered: 11 March 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 416Tanzan
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dave Bush:
quote:
Originally posted by chuck375:
Might as well go with a 257 Roberts in that length. Classy cartridge too!


+1 tu2


tu2

+2

Down at the narrow end of hunting calibres the cases in the 2-2.25" lengths seem about right for propelling normal length bullets. The 243 and the Bob are classic. Around .27 the '06-case becomes a capacity of choice, giving us the 270, 280, and 30-06. From .30" I would choose the Ruger case. But it is new and the 338Win does it all. It's how I see cartridges and cases growing up. There is plenty of room for specialty rounds.


+-+-+-+-+-+-+

"A well-rounded hunting battery might include:
500 AccRel Nyati, 416 Rigby or 416 Ruger, 375Ruger or 338WM, 308 or 270, 243, 223" --
Conserving creation, hunting the harvest.
 
Posts: 4253 | Registered: 10 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
I've owned several 25-06 rifles in my lifetime......all with 22" barrels and all quite adequate for my interests.

If I was to build another it too would have a 22" barrel.....the need for long barrels is purely emotional.....not a realistic usable extra to be had here.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
i too would rather have a longer tube, but a nice rifle is a nice rifle.. tj3006
 
Posts: 605 | Location: OR | Registered: 28 March 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill

An interesting quote to attribute to the father of the British Socialized Medicine system. Churchill's legacy will eventually doom Great Britain as they struggle with what to do with all of the old people it has led to. Harrumph, harrump!
 
Posts: 13257 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I hvae just bought a Sauer 202 and specified the 24" barrel. Have only tried 75,87 and 90gn projectiles so far but none have shot their best when pushed to maximum velocity. Accurate nodes were all at velocities that could easily be reached in a 22" barrel with a slightly heavier powder charge.
Heavier pills might be a different story.


The hunting imperative was part of every man's soul; some denied or suppressed it, others diverted it into less blatantly violent avenues of expression, wielding clubs on the golf course or racquets on the court, substituting a little white ball for the prey of flesh and blood.
Wilbur Smith
 
Posts: 916 | Location: L.H. side of downunder | Registered: 07 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Michael Robinson
posted Hide Post
A 23" barrel is plenty for a .25-06.

I have an R93 barrel in that length and am very pleased with it.


Mike

Wilderness is my cathedral, and hunting is my prayer.
 
Posts: 13720 | Location: New England | Registered: 06 June 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by vapodog:
I've owned several 25-06 rifles in my lifetime......all with 22" barrels and all quite adequate for my interests.

If I was to build another it too would have a 22" barrel.....the need for long barrels is purely emotional.....not a realistic usable extra to be had here.


What's the noise factor like with a 22" barrel? One of my .25-'06's has a 24" barrel, the other a 26" and they are still pretty loud.
 
Posts: 1748 | Registered: 27 March 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
What's the noise factor like with a 22" barrel? One of my .25-'06's has a 24" barrel, the other a 26" and they are still pretty loud.

A shorter barrel will always be a few decibels louder than a longer barrel; of greater importance is that the muzzle blast occurs two to four inches closer to your head, which adds to the effect and compounds the louder blast to make a significant difference.
 
Posts: 13257 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bushchook:
I hvae just bought a Sauer 202 and specified the 24" barrel. Have only tried 75,87 and 90gn projectiles so far but none have shot their best when pushed to maximum velocity. Accurate nodes were all at velocities that could easily be reached in a 22" barrel with a slightly heavier powder charge.
Heavier pills might be a different story.


Notice you said accurate node velocities. Those same velocities in the shorter barrel may not be as accurate. It's not only the weight of the bullet that influences the barrel harmonics, the powder burn rate does too. Not that I advocate it, but this is where the Browning Boss muzzle device comes in handy. You can fine tune your load.
 
Posts: 2459 | Registered: 02 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stonecreek:
quote:
What's the noise factor like with a 22" barrel? One of my .25-'06's has a 24" barrel, the other a 26" and they are still pretty loud.

A shorter barrel will always be a few decibels louder than a longer barrel; of greater importance is that the muzzle blast occurs two to four inches closer to your head, which adds to the effect and compounds the louder blast to make a significant difference.

The laws of physics can't be denied....that said the noise of a 25-06 (or even a .270 from a 22" barrel) has never bothered me much.

IMO it's simply another excuse for folks to fall in love with their longer barrels.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stonecreek:
quote:
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill

An interesting quote to attribute to the father of the British Socialized Medicine system. Churchill's legacy will eventually doom Great Britain as they struggle with what to do with all of the old people it has led to. Harrumph, harrump!

The British health care system was founded in 1948.....several years after Churchill was forced from office.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
The laws of physics can't be denied....that said the noise of a 25-06 (or even a .270 from a 22" barrel) has never bothered me much.

IMO it's simply another excuse for folks to fall in love with their longer barrels.


The amount of decibels a cartridge generates depends on (at least) four factors: 1. bullet weight, 2. burning rate of propellant, 3. expansion ratio of cartridge case, and 4. length of barrel.

A lot of my rifles have 22" and sub-22" barrels, but they compensate in other ways. Most of my .40"+ caliber rifles have 22" barrels because they are much handier to use in thick cover. My Mannlicher stocked carbines are calibers like 6.5X54, 7X57, 8X60, 9X56, 9X57 and 9.3X64. No 7X64's or .270's with short barrels for me!

In my experience, it is not the shooter who suffers from the excess decibels, but his hunting companion or the innocent by-stander at the rifle range.
 
Posts: 1748 | Registered: 27 March 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
has anyone actually used a decibel meter to measure the actual differences?


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by vapodog:
quote:
Originally posted by Stonecreek:
quote:
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill

An interesting quote to attribute to the father of the British Socialized Medicine system. Churchill's legacy will eventually doom Great Britain as they struggle with what to do with all of the old people it has led to. Harrumph, harrump!

The British health care system was founded in 1948.....several years after Churchill was forced from office.


Vapo: You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. Churchill instigated the move to establish "Socialized Medicine", but his party lost the election in 1945. While he was in the minority, the NHS was established, then he returned to power and protected it from the Australopithicenes in his own party. Here's an excerpt from the history of that period:

Although Churchill endorsed the idea of a national health system, his party lost the first post-war general election in 1945, partly because British voters didn’t trust the Tories to implement the Beveridge report. Instead a Labor government established universal care under the NHS in 1948.

Only three years later, the Tories returned to power with Churchill restored as prime minister. At that point, the NHS could still have been killed — and many members of the Tory party, not to mention the British Medical Association, were eager to do so.

But Churchill asked Claude Guillebaud, a Cambridge economist, to head a committee to study the performance and efficiency of the NHS. The Gillebaud committee found that the NHS was highly effective – and needed additional funding to insure that effectiveness would continue. There was no more talk of dismantling the very popular service, and instead the Tories under Churchill and his immediate successors allocated more money to build additional clinics and hospitals. Even Margaret Thatcher, the most ideological Tory prime minister of modern times, promised voters that “the NHS is safe in our hands.”
 
Posts: 13257 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
Stonecreek,
Thanks for the info.....as you're aware.....I didn't know that
Vapo


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of londonhunter
posted Hide Post
Wow guys this must be the MOST Off topic thread ever

From 25-06 to the history of the NHS

Got to take my hat off

Never thought a casual link was possible between the 2 subjects

Ever thought about going on mastermind 2014 ?

Ok back onto topic

When I was offered this barrel for so little money I got suspicious

So I paid for somebody independent to bore scope it

Lucky I done that the throat has been toasted and the seller did not even know about it

So back to square one

I am still on the look out for something interesting

Medium long range cartridge

7mm something ....
 
Posts: 1661 | Location: London | Registered: 14 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I think anything over 20" will be fun and fine.
 
Posts: 831 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 28 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Much to do over nothing...in reality you won't see much difference in a 22 or 24 inch barrel in the 25-06 if you use the right powders..It has plenty of velocity with both especially for big game hunting. I have had both and like the .270 one was about as good as the other..I lost about 35 FPS with heavier bullets and it made no difference with lighter bullets as they were cooking at up to 3400 or more with both lengths, so the loss was zilch, but to each his own, its a choice, but I have a chronograph that is my usual guide to such things.


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42190 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have to agree with Atkinson on this, it's much to do over nothing!

My experience with the 25-06 is, because of case capacity and bore diameter the 25-06 24" tube will develop a little more velocity with slower scale burn rate powders but has a diminishing effect as you move to faster burn rate powders when comparing it to a 22" tube.

This ain't no general rule of thumb that can be applied to other Calibers and Case Capacities.

Take for instant the 6mm Rem, generally speaking, you would actually get close to maximum velocity from a 22" tube shooting standard powders for that listing, it's the same in 308 win. Bullet weight also has affect.

It's all got to do with peak barrel pressure and bullet velocity, and at what length that is achieved during the burn, after that you are simple pissing in the wind and past time the bullet should have left the barrel.

When the round reaches peak barrel pressure and bullet velocity it's time for "Elvis to leave the building"! hilbily
 
Posts: 9568 | Registered: 05 September 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    Shorty 25-06 what do you think ?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia