quote:

Originally posted by Kabluewy:

quote:

Originally posted by KurtC:
The CZ 550 gets an A+ for function, but a B or a C for form. Cast receiver, plastic followers, screw on sights, etc. Definitely useable, but economic.

OK, let's see:
Cast Receiver. Humm, I think Ruger uses a cast receiver, however Chuck Hawks in his product review of the CZ 550 says the receiver is forged. I dunno, and I can't find another reference sourse.

The plastic follower can easily be replaced.

The American has no sights, so screw on is not relevant.

That about leaves A+ for function, and economic.

As I look at the profile of the CZ 550, compared to a standard LR '98 action, I see that the 550 seems slimmer.

Oh, yes, the safety. Both Gentry and LaPour make a three-position safety for the 550.

I have looked at the wood on some of those BRNO's, and IMO the 550 wood is better looking.

I don't recall ever hearing anyone complain about the accuracy of the factory barrels on the 550 either.

Humm, now just where is the problem?
KB