THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Page 1 2 3 4 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
What is your favorite 7?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Ok here is the deal, I've had a couple of 7mm rifles but could never warm up to them. I had a .280 Rem and 7mm Rem Mag. It wasn't that they were unpleasnt to shoot I just kept going back to my .270 Win when it came time to hunt as it still seems to be the most accurate rifle I have in my hands. Between .224-.375 the 7mm and 9.3 are two calibers that I'm lacking in my rifle collection.

So I'm thinking a 7mm rifle again, and trying to decide what one to try. I know the 7X57 and the 7mm-08 are pretty popular on this forum and I've been cosidering them heavily. I just keep coming back to the idea of a 7-30 Waters in a bolt action rifle like the Remington 788 or an T/C single shot.

I'm not against giving the .280 and 7mm RM a go again. I really don't want to go to a cartridge larger than the Rem Mag, but I'm trying to keep my options open.
 
Posts: 2242 | Registered: 09 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of TheBigGuy
posted Hide Post
For a Non-Magnum 7mm.

280REM would be my top choice.
 
Posts: 1282 | Registered: 17 September 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
A 7x57 with 175 grain round nose bullets would be a very retro choice!

LWD
 
Posts: 2104 | Location: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: 16 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Go with the 7mm Remington Ultra Mag. Unbelievable top end performance. You can always load it down to what ever performance level you want but you will never get the others up to it. Only downside I see is recoil and the expense of extra powder.


Free men should not be subjected to permits, paperwork and taxation in order to carry any firearm. NRA Benefactor
 
Posts: 1652 | Location: Deer Park, Texas | Registered: 08 June 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
IMO, the 7RUM is waaay over bore. I can get really close to it w/ my 7mmDakota & quite a bit less powder. The 280 is a great round, way underated. If you want a SA, then the 7-08 or a 7SAUM. Those are my fav. in order.


LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT!
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The Mauser, QED.
 
Posts: 1374 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LWD:
A 7x57 with 175 grain round nose bullets would be a very retro choice!

LWD


Great minds think alike. coffee thumb
 
Posts: 2814 | Location: Tucson AZ USA | Registered: 11 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Favorite is the 7X57 followed by the .280 Remington.


TreeFarmer
NRA Life Member

Moderation in the pursuit of decadence is no virture.
 
Posts: 262 | Location: PA & VA, USA | Registered: 26 June 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 30378:
Go with the 7mm Remington Ultra Mag. Unbelievable top end performance. You can always load it down to what ever performance level you want but you will never get the others up to it. Only downside I see is recoil and the expense of extra powder.

With a handle like the one you are using I'm not suprised to hear the RUM come up. The reason I'm not really into that cartridge is the amount of powder burned. If I'm going to download to 7mm RM performance I should of stuck with what I had instead of making it a .375 Ruger.

7X57 definatly a good choice IMO and I really hadn't thought of the retro approach to it. Plenty of good Mausers out there to be had that I could rebarrel to this caliber. The 175 grain bullet is a little heavier than what I was thinking of using.

The 7-30 Waters or maybe the AI version of it just keeps calling to me. I was planing on sticking to bullets 120 grains or lighter. Kind of a plinking rifle for yotes and prairie dogs on occasion as well as being able to take a pronghorn or deer. The AI version would give me a little more so to speak and that is where the Encore/Pro-hunter would come in handy.
 
Posts: 2242 | Registered: 09 March 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'm not a fan of obscure cartridges, or ones for which the brass is hard to find or expensive or requires forming from something else.

I also don't care for the overbore magnums.

I like to be able to find and buy brass in bulk without difficulty, and to have factory ammo available without searching everywhere and at a reasonable price if, for some reason, handloads are lost or otherwse unavailable.

So for me the choices would be 7 x 57, 7mm/08, or 280.

Loaded to the same pressures, the 280 is more-or-less a ballistic twin of the 270, but with slightly heavier bullets.

The 7 x 57 and the 7mm/08 are ballistic twins, and, although I prefer the 7 x 57 (also for nostalgic reasons), the 7mm/08 is probably a better choice nowadays because loads and brass for it are more prevalent, and 7mm/08 factory loads appear in more bullet weights and are loaded to higher velocities than those for the 7 x 57. I fact, I was recently in the Bass Pro Shop South of Baltimore and was unable to find any 7 x 57 ammo there, but there were several different 7mm/08 loads.

The 7mm Rem. Mag would also be an excellent choice -- you can think of it as a 270 or 280 on steroids -- but it is more than is needed (more kick, more noise, more powder burned) for deer, antelope, and any game animal under 500 pounds or so.

If you wanted to use one rifle for everything in North America and you hunt elk and moose regularly, the 7mm Rem. Mag would be one of the best choices.


"How's that whole 'hopey-changey' thing working out for ya?"
 
Posts: 5883 | Location: People's Republic of Maryland | Registered: 11 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Paul B:
quote:
Originally posted by LWD:
A 7x57 with 175 grain round nose bullets would be a very retro choice!

LWD


Great minds think alike. coffee thumb


+1


Mike
 
Posts: 21817 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 30378:
Go with the 7mm Remington Ultra Mag.

Only downside I see is recoil and the expense of extra powder.


Recoil is not only a downside but is THE main reason many people are not shooting a 7STW, 7 Ultra., 300 Ultra, 300 Weath. etc. etc.

If these guns didn't rip a person's face off every time they pulled the trigger, believe me, I would NOT be shooting my .270 Win.
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Why are you thinking about buying a 7mm-08, 7 X 57, or a .280 when you own an accurate .270?

Your .270 tops the 7 X 57 and the 7mm-08 in ballistics with no noticable difference in recoil.

Going to a 280 is just a waste of money vs. the 270. I have recovered a 140 grain Barnes TSX shot out of my .270 and weighed it on my grain scale. 139.9 gr's. Using leaded 160 gr bullets in a .280, the 140 gr. TSX from a 270 will perform just as well, losing no weight, and shoot flatter.
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Harold R. Stephens
posted Hide Post
My first seven that I ever owned is a 7MM STW. I just love that gun. I recently acquired a 7mm mag and that thing kicks like a mule. I could see myself building a 7-08 later in life. For now the 7mm mag is going to become a 257 Weatherby mag ASAP


Founding member of the 7MM STW club

Member of the Texas Cull Hunters Association
 
Posts: 512 | Location: Granbury, Texas | Registered: 23 January 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LE270:
I'm not a fan of obscure cartridges, or ones for which the brass is hard to find or expensive or requires forming from something else.

The 7mm Rem. Mag would also be an excellent choice -- you can think of it as a 270 or 280 on steroids -- but it is more than is needed (more kick, more noise, more powder burned) for deer, antelope, and any game animal under 500 pounds or so.


Sure the 7-30 is obscure but since I can use .30-30 brass which I have quite a bit of no problem. As far as forming the case it shouldn't be any harder than my 8mm-06 or .338-06. Of course if I went with the AI version I'd have to fire form which would add an extra step but not a big one.

As far as the 7mm Rem Mag goes, I know it is a proven cartridge but I never saw where it would blow my .270 away. My .270 Win with 150 grain NP has been the hammer of Thor on elk for quite a few years for me. With 130 grain bullets my .270 has accounted for several coyotes beyond 400 yards and one mule deer buck at 500+ so I don't see where the 7mm RM will extend my shooting distances by a great deal.

I'm leaning towards the 7X57 just for the fact that it is easier to find than the 7-30. Plus it does give me the capabilities of using a wider selection of 7mm bullets. The 7X57 does have that cool factor about it as well.

quote:
Originally posted by ar corey:
Why are you thinking about buying a 7mm-08, 7 X 57, or a .280 when you own an accurate .270?


Hard to argue with that logic but the problem really is that I over lap so much on my cartridges that the 7mm doesn't fill any needs for me it is just a want. I just like to play with differnet cartridges from time to time. The cartridges on my reloading bench are:

.223 Rem, .243 Win, .25-06 Rem, 6.5X55, .270 Win, .30-30 WCF, .30-40 Krag, .30-06 SPFLD, .300 H&H, .303 Brit, 8mm-06, .338-06 AS, .358 Win, .35 Whelen, .375 Ruger
 
Posts: 2242 | Registered: 09 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The fact is NONE of those cartridges are gonna BLOW any of the others away. The 7mag would be a better choice for elk but overkill for deer whilst the .270 would be light for elk but ideal for deer and the wheels on the bus go round and round.
I wouldn't sell a .270 to buy a .280 (altho I did) but if I had nothing and was just starting out and wanted an ideal deer rifle, I'd buy a 7-08. If I wanted an ideal deer rifle with an ocassional elk, I'd buy a .280. If I hunted mainly elk with an ocassional deer, I'd get the 7mag. I'd leave the .270 (and the 7x57) for the nostalgia buffs to fondle and dream of Jack OConnor and Bell. Smiler (fwiw, I have 4 7=08's, 1 .280 & 1 7mag, No .270's Wink )
 
Posts: 1287 | Registered: 11 January 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I don't get the ones who say a 7Mag if you're hunting elk at all. The 7x57 or 7-08 will flatten elk, moose or anything with today's premium 160-175 grain bullets and loaded to modern pressures. If I hunted mainly elk and larger, I'd carry a .338-06 or .338 WM, but have killed more game here, and in Africa with the 7x57 than any other, with 160 partitions.


A shot not taken is always a miss
 
Posts: 2788 | Location: gallatin, mo usa | Registered: 10 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
7x64 Brenneke and 7x66 Vom Hofe. Just acquired a reamer for the Vom Hofe, so this cartridge will move up a few spots in line.
 
Posts: 355 | Location: CO | Registered: 19 March 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by pinotguy:
7x64 Brenneke and 7x66 Vom Hofe. Just acquired a reamer for the Vom Hofe, so this cartridge will move up a few spots in line.


Yes in Europe, but not in America -- too difficult to get brass for them here.


"How's that whole 'hopey-changey' thing working out for ya?"
 
Posts: 5883 | Location: People's Republic of Maryland | Registered: 11 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
popcornThe 7 X 41 followed very closely by the 7 X 57. If elk were on the menu than the 7 X 57 although under 100 yds. the 7 X 41 would make a nice showing in the hands of a cool hunter. fishingroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Another vote for the 7x57. In my case, the 7x57R.


Cheers, Dave.

Aut Inveniam Viam aut Faciam.
 
Posts: 6716 | Location: The Hunting State. | Registered: 08 March 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Strut10
posted Hide Post
Dyed-in-the-wool 7-STW fan, here. But not sure it fits your wants.


Founder....the OTPG
 
Posts: 764 | Location: slightly off | Registered: 22 March 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ACRecurve
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
quote:
Originally posted by Paul B:
quote:
Originally posted by LWD:
A 7x57 with 175 grain round nose bullets would be a very retro choice!

LWD


Great minds think alike. coffee thumb


+1
+2 retro maybe...very effective--yep!


Good hunting,

Andy

-----------------------------
Thomas Jefferson: “To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.”

 
Posts: 6711 | Location: Oklahoma, USA | Registered: 14 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The 7mag. is hard to beat for most hunting.It can achive over 3200fps with bullets up to 150grs.You can get a wide selection of bullets for it.Because it is so popular,ammo and brass is easy to find and it is usually fairly priced too.The recoil is not bad at all with a good recoil pad.I kinda feel about the same way Jack O'Conner felt about the 270.It's a darn good all around caliber.
 
Posts: 359 | Location: Corpus Christi,Texas | Registered: 19 April 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Never warmed up to it? There is such a stunning array of bullets in every shape and size. Rivals the 308 cal in that respect.
7x57, 7-08, 280 Rem, 7mm Mag - all excellent at what they were designed for.
280 is just about perfect for NA big game. 7x57 might win in the right rifle.


Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.
 
Posts: 2000 | Location: Beaverton OR | Registered: 19 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
280 kicks ass if you cant figure that out.we cant have an intelligent conversatrion and I have owned all the sevens.w/regards
 
Posts: 610 | Location: MT | Registered: 01 December 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Doc
posted Hide Post
I would opt for another 7mm Rem Mag first, a 280AI second, 7mm Dakota third, and 7-08 fourth.


Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my guns
 
Posts: 7906 | Registered: 05 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I would build a 7-30 Waters! That is what you really want, right? Besides, with your current chamberings theres no real nitch you can fill with any of the other 7's you asked about so why not..........
 
Posts: 231 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 22 December 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Karoo
posted Hide Post
quote:
I would build a 7-30 Waters! That is what you really want, right? Besides, with your current chamberings theres no real nitch you can fill with any of the other 7's you asked about so why not..........


Very good point and it must be great fun plinking with such a mild rifle.
 
Posts: 787 | Location: Eastern Cape, South Africa | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Dr. Lou
posted Hide Post
Short action - 7-08
Long action - 280/7x64


****************
NRA Life Benefactor Member
 
Posts: 3316 | Location: USA | Registered: 15 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
i really love my 7mm-08 REMINGTON. I shot a .280 for years, but i always go back to my 7-08 with a 24 in barrel, using 140'S at 2940 fps shot over croney. but my last few years for deer size game i use my .260 rem.
 
Posts: 1137 | Location: SouthCarolina | Registered: 07 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
We are a 7x57 family.... Big Grin

Don




 
Posts: 5798 | Registered: 10 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
7 STW, 160 TSXs at 3300. Whats not to like?
 
Posts: 558 | Location: Southwest B.C. | Registered: 16 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of zimbabwe
posted Hide Post
Never really could figure out why they even bothered to mess around with any 7mm's after the 7x57 was developed. Actually once owned a 7mm Express but didn't figure out why it was any better than the 7x57 so I sold it. Had a 7mm Barr Magnum many years ago and couldn't figure out why I had it either. Have a 7x57 now and do know why I have it. It just does the job over and over and over with no punishment on the shooter with boring regularity.


SCI Life Member
NRA Patron Life Member
DRSS
 
Posts: 2786 | Location: Green Valley,Az | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Dr. Lou
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MTM:
7 STW, 160 TSXs at 3300. Whats not to like?


RECOIL! Big Grin


****************
NRA Life Benefactor Member
 
Posts: 3316 | Location: USA | Registered: 15 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
ConfusedWhy is it when someone says they LOVE a 7mm-08 it stirs strange errotic images in my mind? bewilderedroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SteveM70:
I would build a 7-30 Waters! That is what you really want, right? Besides, with your current chamberings theres no real nitch you can fill with any of the other 7's you asked about so why not..........


Don't know for sure if that is what I really want, but I keep coming back to it. I've got plenty of hunting calibers, not saying the 7-30 isn't one, but it is far differnt from my other hunting cartridges. If I'm going to build it I really want it in a bolt action and that has been the major hang up so far in this caliber.
 
Posts: 2242 | Registered: 09 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bartsche:
popcornThe 7 X 41 followed very closely by the 7 X 57. If elk were on the menu than the 7 X 57 although under 100 yds. the 7 X 41 would make a nice showing in the hands of a cool hunter. fishingroger


So tell me about the 7X41, I'm not familiar with that cartridge?
 
Posts: 2242 | Registered: 09 March 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
One that hasn't been mentioned yet and my favorite 7mm.............The 7mmBR!!! Won't get you to the elk and stuff at faraway distances but what fun just to shoot! And it does do very nicely on whitetails with 120Noslers OR 120VMAX's! GHD


Groundhog Devastation(GHD)
 
Posts: 2495 | Location: SW. VA | Registered: 29 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by taylorce1:
[

So tell me about the 7X41, I'm not familiar with that cartridge?


fishingIt is very close to a 7mmBR but .100" longer. I designed it in the late 50s and finally built it in 1982. It is the same muzzle energy level as the 30-30 but superior flight characteristics. It is long throated and will accurately push a 175 gr. bullet to 2250 fps. at safe pressures. A well known participant on this forum grew up using a 25-35 on elk. If a proficiant hunter marksman such as this used the 7X41 Those Elk would be stirMORE DEAD BOOMroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia