THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    Remington 7600 Carbine Barrel Length?

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Remington 7600 Carbine Barrel Length?
 Login/Join
 
new member
posted
I am going to get a Rem 7600 in the near future for a still-hunt rifle. I want a carbine-length for close quarters. From the factory, the only carbine offering is 30-06 in a 18.5" barrel. I really want a 308. However, to get it I would need to buy the standard 22" rifle and have it cut. Here's my question: With the 308 Win being a slightly more efficient round than the 30-06, would I get more velocity with a 308 win or 30-06 in a 18.5" barrel? (Let's assume I am using Remington factory loadings of 150 grain Core-Lokt PSPCL in each cartridge.) Obviously the 30-06 will beat the 308 in longer barrel lengths, but will the muzzle velocity of the 30-06 in this short barrel be reduced sufficiently to render it nearly equal to that of the 308 anyway? My hunch is that the two cartridges will produce nearly the same velocity or they'll be close enough that the difference will be negligible. If that's the case, I'm going to get a standard 22" 308 and then have the barrel cut. That way I'll burn less powder, have less powder ejecta and recoil, plus have less muzzle blast and noise; all of which allow a faster follow-up if needed. Please weigh in.
 
Posts: 1 | Location: NC | Registered: 29 November 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Rick R
posted Hide Post
If your dealer can get Remington law enforcement firearms you have an option for a 16.5" .308.



http://www.remingtonle.com/rifles/7600.htm
 
Posts: 1912 | Location: Charleston, WV, USA | Registered: 10 January 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ELKMAN2
posted Hide Post
With a 18.5in barrel I doubt you will notice any difference between the two calibers. Both will be loud and bright!!
 
Posts: 1072 | Location: Pine Haven, Wyo | Registered: 14 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
the .30-06 will slightly outperform the .308 in any barrel length.....but only slightly


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cobra
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by pre6470:
I am going to get a Rem 7600 in the near future for a still-hunt rifle. I want a carbine-length for close quarters. From the factory, the only carbine offering is 30-06 in a 18.5" barrel. I really want a 308. However, to get it I would need to buy the standard 22" rifle and have it cut. Here's my question: With the 308 Win being a slightly more efficient round than the 30-06, would I get more velocity with a 308 win or 30-06 in a 18.5" barrel? (Let's assume I am using Remington factory loadings of 150 grain Core-Lokt PSPCL in each cartridge.) Obviously the 30-06 will beat the 308 in longer barrel lengths, but will the muzzle velocity of the 30-06 in this short barrel be reduced sufficiently to render it nearly equal to that of the 308 anyway? My hunch is that the two cartridges will produce nearly the same velocity or they'll be close enough that the difference will be negligible. If that's the case, I'm going to get a standard 22" 308 and then have the barrel cut. That way I'll burn less powder, have less powder ejecta and recoil, plus have less muzzle blast and noise; all of which allow a faster follow-up if needed. Please weigh in.


I have a carbine model and as much as I like it's handiness, if I had to do it over again here is what I would do. First I would buy a regular model and cut the barrel to 20", not 18.5". Next since I usually hunt in a cold climate I would cut the LOP to 13", this allows for bulky clothing. The result is the same length as the carbine model and slightly better velocity than the 18.5" barrel. The biggest reason I would go this way is less muzzle blast. As far as calibre goes, if you're hunting in close quarters as you say, the difference between a 30-06 and .308 is mostly mental masturbation. Me, I like the 30-06 in the event of a longer shot with 180 grain bullets.


 
Posts: 8827 | Location: CANADA | Registered: 25 August 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Whelen Nut
posted Hide Post
pre6470

Well, there's always the 35Remington in a carbine 7600. Not sure if Grices' have any left.

With 200 grainers it is an effective close quarters round. If you handload, you can use 220grainers effectively.

WN


Fill your boots, man!
 
Posts: 249 | Location: Northeast WI | Registered: 30 June 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Whatever you shoot won't know the differance. Both the .308 and -06 are pretty "blasty" with short barrels.

Whelen Nut has a great idea...35 Rem in a 7600 or you could get a Marlin 336 in .35 Rem and it comes with a 20" barrel and is a pretty handy gun in a tree or stand and it will give good service thru elk/moose size critters up close.

Maybe take the gunsmith costs you'd spend on shortening the barrel and get a carbine in 260 or 7mm-08 or a .308 if you really want it. Good luck!!


The year of the .30-06!!
100 years of mostly flawless performance on demand.....Celebrate...buy a new one!!
 
Posts: 858 | Location: MD Eastern Shore | Registered: 24 May 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    Remington 7600 Carbine Barrel Length?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia