THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
No umph?
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of kk
posted
I have been talking guns with a friend and want to present a question:

Two years ago, Dave was hunting deer with his 7mm Rem. Mag and factory ammunition. I can't say what it was, but suspect it was 160 gr. bullets. No idea of the brand.

Dave took a quartering away shot at a nice buck at about 75 yards, which then took off and ran a few hundred yards before it died.

On recovering the animal, Dave discovered his bullet had entered behind the rib cage and had proceeded into the chest cavity, where he recovered it.

So the question is obvious: why would a hot cartridge like the 7 mm Rem. Mag. run out of gas after 18 inches or so of soft tissue?

I had wondered if there was impact prior to the animal (branch, etc.), but he says the bullet was intact and expanded.

Guesses?

kk
 
Posts: 1224 | Location: Southern Ontario, Canada | Registered: 14 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The reason why the bullet didn't penetrate as much as you feel it should have may have to do with the type of bullet he used.Keep in mind that the faster the bullet expands through flesh, the faster it will stop penetrating.

One of several things that will slow the bullet through flesh is expansion. If the bullet expanded fully, it means that it worked as designed. It seems to me that there was nothing wrong with the bullet your friend used, because 18" of penetration through the lungs/heart is not bad. If he would have used a solid bullet, then it is possible the bullet would have passed right through the deer. Another way to get more penetration from the same rifle is to use heavier bullets. The heavier bullets don't expand as fast, because their depart the barrel at slower velocities than lightweigh bullets.

Some very fast and very lightweight bullets are designed to kill tiny animals at long range. These lightweigh bullets are launched extremely fast, and expand so fast that often they penetrate the skin and stop there or blow apart.

A friend of mine kills moose with his 7mm magnum, but he uses heavy bullets that often pass right through. I hope I have been of some help on this subject.
 
Posts: 2448 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 25 May 2002Reply With Quote
<Harry>
posted
Then again there is that old saying, "At what point in the death of the animal did the bullet fail?" [Razz]
Sounds like it worked to me. [Smile]
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of todbartell
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by kk:
So the question is obvious: why would a hot cartridge like the 7 mm Rem. Mag. run out of gas after 18 inches or so of soft tissue?

I'd say the bullet over-expanded due to the high impact velocity and the fact that it was too lightly constructed. I'd say it was a 140-150 gr., just due to the fact that most(not all)160 gr. bullets are built stoutly enough to hold together on deer.

I'd say the bullet didn't fail, but without seeing it or knowing it's retained weight, it's nearly impossible. If it expanded so much that it came too a stop inside the animal, it obviously expanded quite wide, or fragmented. This bullet would have been better for a broadside shot, but a tougher design is needed for a quartering away shot, or any shot that requires deep penetration.

If you could give us more info, like bullet weight and type, it would be easier to find out maybe what happened. If it was a Ballistic Tip, I'd say it performed as intended. If it was a tougher style, I'd say it failed. Couldn't of been a Partition, they don' fail [Smile]
 
Posts: 857 | Location: BC, Canada | Registered: 03 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of todbartell
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Harry:
Then again there is that old saying, "At what point in the death of the animal did the bullet fail?"

Most bullet that "fail" kill 90% of the time. In this case, the shooter failed to match bullet with cartridge. Should of picked a tougher bullet to withstand such high velocity. I'm sure if he was shooting a Nosler Partition in this instance, the deer would of made it much less than the "several hundred yards" it did cover, with a good blood trail to boot from the exit.
 
Posts: 857 | Location: BC, Canada | Registered: 03 November 2001Reply With Quote
<Savage 99>
posted
There was a thread like this on Hunt Chat last year. Some guy shot a deer with a 160 Partition in fact and it ran all over the place. The 300 yard distance sounds familar.

Everytime a question was asked he had more details until it was a complete autopsy. It just seemed like the bullet failed or hit a twig and tumbled first.

There is a rumor that the belted cartridges just don't hit very hard. It's the lack of good headspace control. I push forward when I shoot my belted mags. It gives the bullet that little extra velocity.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Savage,
Ha,ha,ha...(your last post... Ipush forward)

Don't kid yourself, the 7mm with the 160gr. Partition penetrates phenomonally. I have seen several jumbo bull moose shot with this particular combo and not one bullet was recovered. One bull that weighed around the 1500lb. mark, I had shot twice with my .338-225TophyBonded. The bull was dying on his feet. He stood there, wobbling, and I grabbed my partners gun, a 7mmRM.-160gr. Partitions. An hammered the bull one more time just for the hell of it. That 160gr. bullet caught the last rib and exited the out the front of the off side shoulder. I found both of my .338 bullets. Come to think of it, I do not ever recall recovering a 160gr. partition from any animal that myself or my hunting partner have killed.
With the experience that I have had and that what I have witnessed with the 7mmRm and 160gr. Partitions, anyone claiming poor penitration is full of shit! With that being said, I have recovered some hornady bullets, even in whitetails.
Bob Hagel and Warren Page thought alot of the 7mmRM and 160-175gr. bullets and they had alot of experience under thier belts.

Daryl
 
Posts: 536 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon | Registered: 28 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of MacD37
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by todbartell:
I'm sure if he was shooting a Nosler Partition in this instance, the deer would of made it much less than the "several hundred yards" it did cover, with a good blood trail to boot from the exit.[/QB]

I agree with the Nosler partitions, they are my favorite soft point bullet in everything up to 375 H&H. What I don't understand is this facination with blood trails, I'm 66 years old, and have been shooting deer since the age of six, and I have only had to follow one deer by blood trail in my life. He was shot at nearly 400 yds,in the bottom of "THE HOLE", a canyon we have killed many large muledeer over the years, and jumped at the same time the trigger was pulled, hitting him too far back, still he only made about 50 yds, before dieing. Most drop in their tracks, or stumble no more than a few feet! Then, again, I wouldn't shoot at running deer that was not already wounded! Maybe that's why I haven't had to trail any! [Confused]
 
Posts: 14634 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: 08 June 2000Reply With Quote
<eldeguello>
posted
For a bullet of any given construction, except for perhaps a long, roundnose solid that is well stabilized, the faster it goes, the less it penetrates. (This is true down to a speed of around 1500 FPS or so.) An expanding bullet "loses sectional density" the more it expands. For an extreme example, at the same velocity, a nail hitting point-on will penetrate much more than a washer hitting flat!! Old Elmer Keith's .44 Mag. 250-grain SWC pistol load always out-penetrated a .30/'06 softpoint!! [Big Grin]

[ 01-20-2003, 19:18: Message edited by: eldeguello ]
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of MacD37
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ray, Alaska:
If he would have used a solid bullet, then it is possible the bullet would have passed right through the deer.

I hope I have been of some help on this subject.

Ray, I could be wrong but Alaska is the only state I'm aware of that allows the use of solid, non-expanding bullets on game animals. Does anyone else out there know of a state that allows solids on deer? [Confused]
 
Posts: 14634 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: 08 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Having some experience with the 260 Nosler Partition, I'd bet a nickel to a donut that it was a 150gr bullet or lighter bullet, not a 260gr. Generally, the 260 will penetrate pretty well, and we've been shooting them at stouter stuff than deer.

Magnums ought to be used with the heaviest bullets practical. They shoot slower, but penetrate better; stay together better; and retain energy better than the lighter bullets. Because of this, they shoot amazingly flat. If we'd all use heavier bullets, we wouldn't have to track our game as far. Ku-dude
 
Posts: 959 | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of todbartell
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by eldeguello:
For a bullet of any given construction, except for perhaps a long, roundnose solid that is well stabilized, the faster it goes, the less it penetrates. (This is true down to a speed of around 1500 FPS or so.) An expanding bullet "loses sectional density" the more it expands. [Big Grin]

Correct, but a Nosler will expand until it hits the "Partition", then the forward part(ogive) of the jacket peels back along the shank of the bullet. Recovered Partitions usually have a pretty small foward area, not too much more than a caliber. That is why the NP has such a good reputation for deep penetration. Nosler has come out with a remedy for this problem(I guess it's not really a problem [Big Grin] ), with the CT Partition Gold, with the beefed up front jacket. Supposed to have a "larger diameter" mushroom. Game I've shot with the Golds were just as dead as the ones taken with the regular 'ol Partitions. [Wink]
 
Posts: 857 | Location: BC, Canada | Registered: 03 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of kk
posted Hide Post
Ku-Dude:

Bingo! Since posting this, I have heard back from Dave. He was using 150-gr. Federal factory loads. He had also written to Federal, and they had responded that he should try using the 175 gr.

Now I'd like to know from Federal how people are supposed to know that?

kk

[ 01-21-2003, 19:53: Message edited by: kk ]
 
Posts: 1224 | Location: Southern Ontario, Canada | Registered: 14 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of todbartell
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by kk:
He was using 150-gr. Federal factory loads. He had also written to Federal, and they had responded that he should try using the 175 gr.

Federal makes 2 different 150 gr. 7mm Rem Mag loads. One features the Nosler Ballistic Tip, the other one is the Hi-Shok SP, both @ 3110 fps. So, we have the Nosler BT that could fail on a quartering away shot due to over-expansion, and a POS Hi-Shok el-cheapo cup and core bullet that is probably as unpredictable on game as any bullet ever made. In my opinion, the Federal Hi-Shok is the bottom of the barrel as far as bullets go, makes the Remington Cor-Lok & Winchester Power-Point look like super-premiums.

I wouldn't really suggest using a 175 gr. bullet for deer, unless you're going to buy bargain ammo. A cheap bullet may fail at any velocity, but high velocity is the enemy of bullet performance, especially simple designs.

Take a look at these numbers:

75 yards - 150 gr. vs. 175 gr.

150 gr. Hi-Shok - 2898 fps

175 gr. Hi-Shok - 2702 fps

200 fps doesn't seem like much, but this could mean the difference between shedding the core or not. If he was using the 175 gr. load, odds would be a bit better that the bullet would hold together and maybe even exit. Who knows?

Instead of a heavier, cheaper bullet, I'd try a premium, controlled expansion type. A Federal load, featuring the 140 gr. Nosler Partition @ 3150 fps would be a super deer load in the 7mm Mag.
 
Posts: 857 | Location: BC, Canada | Registered: 03 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Flip
posted Hide Post
Bullets can do strange things in the animals. I have seen Barnes X stay in Animals and then on other time penetrate so much more that I can't think why that one bullet stayed in the animal
 
Posts: 931 | Location: Nambia | Registered: 02 June 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia