Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
You've posted some eye-opening results with the .270 WSM. I wonder if the folks will be happy with some of the animals they collect. The .270 Win can leave large holes with 130's as it is, and stepping up the velocity some 250 fps, one would think, would leave gaping holes. This is one calibre IMHO that demands premium bullets. 3350 fps was all I could squeeze out of my .270 Wby with 140 XBT's accurately. More was possible, but it wasn't worth the effort and didn't shoot well. If memory serves me correctly, I was using 80 grains of H 1000 in that 26" tube. I liked IMR 7828 the best, but cases lasted for only a few reloads and eventually I went back to the 7m/m Remington magnum with 160's at 3150 fps. | |||
|
one of us |
Aha, the old factory new caliber trick, load the hell out of them to start with and when all the articles have been written and all the hoopla dies, they cut back 5 to 10 grains and load them at 2700 FPS from then on....Been working wonders for sales for years.... | |||
|
one of us |
If I was you i would invest in a .308 chambered in your choice rifle. This is a great cartridge, comes in a light guns, short actioned thirty caliber, is inherently accurate, wont kick bad, and still packs a heck of a wallop. Most would say that teh .270 has an advantage over the .308 but i would disagree. They are very similar in ballistics. A 130 grain .270 will zip along around what 3100 fps maybe? Well go buy a box of .30 cal. barnes 130 grain bullets and load them in your .308. I imagine very similar velocities. load each with a 150 grain bullet and they have very similar velocities. The beauty of the .308 is its ability to load up heavier bullets, and all sorts, 165, 180, maybe 200, ballistic tip, round nose, soft point, boat tail. To me it just has teh edge. It may not look swell on paper, but wait till you get in the field. My. 2c | |||
|
<Steve in MI> |
I think they call that progress I remember the same thing being said about the 300 ultra, instead it was compared to the 300 win mag. See how that ened,.. For me 270WSM fills in a gap in calibers. Bottom line the WSM smokes the 270 ...Like it or not | ||
One of Us |
quote:I suspect that was a direct, Ray. Good shot. | |||
|
one of us |
From where I sit I feel in the long run the 270 vs the WSM is gonna come out to be much like the 06 vs the 308 debate. Some difference yes but not a lot. I think when it all shakes out this is gonna be a 100-150 fps difference. To some that is enough difference to make a rats and to some it is not. I have relatively little experience with the WSM but a fair bit when it comes to the old 270 Jack. From my 23" Lilja tube here is the speeds I run, and I may add I feel quite comfy with the loads. 130=3200 140=3100 150=3000 To me the only edge ballistically would be in the wind-and that would be fairly minimal I do feel. Just my thoughts....... "GET TO THE HILL" Dogz | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia