THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Got my .270 back from Pac -Nor.
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
Got my .270 back after 4 months at pac Nor. It looks great. I have her all back together and she looks real nice.
I am gonna have to open the barrel channal just a little more to free float but that will only take about half an hour. This is what I have.
Pre 64 Model 70 Featherweight Action with a canjar trigger, trued by pac nor,And installed a 22 inch match grade cryoed chrome molly barrel coutoured to match the factory barrel. The hole ting is finished in matt blue, and It has a matt Leupold VX3 2.5X8 with boone a crocket reticle. In Leopold matt bases and low rings.
Gonna load up some 130 grain Hornady flat bases fo break in With H-4831 sc...tj3006
 
Posts: 129 | Location: Portland oregon | Registered: 12 May 2004Reply With Quote
<9.3x62>
posted
Well, if it doesn't shoot well, it probably isn't the barrel. I've had, and have, quite a number of pac-nor barrels and that are all freakishly accurate, even the thin little whippy ones. Good luck, I bet you've got a real winner on your hands.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
tj3006,

I never free floated a Featherweight barrel so I am interested in how yours turns out. I would shoot it in the stock as is before the material is removed.
 
Posts: 5543 | Registered: 09 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Now, take this with salt as I read it yesterday and don't know from experience as haven't bedded a rifle yet. I read that light barrels don't shoot well sometimes when free floated and it is a good idea, if not shooting well, to put a bit of bedding at the front of the barrel channel to put a little pressure upwards against the tube. just what I read.

Red
 
Posts: 4740 | Location: Fresno, CA | Registered: 21 March 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of POP
posted Hide Post
Quote:

Well, if it doesn't shoot well, it probably isn't the barrel. I've had, and have, quite a number of pac-nor barrels and that are all freakishly accurate, even the thin little whippy ones. Good luck, I bet you've got a real winner on your hands.




I agree!
 
Posts: 3865 | Location: Cheyenne, WYOMING, USA | Registered: 13 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I would try the rifle with a pressure point also but I have had a couple featherweights (still have one in 22-250)that would shoot better after being floated.

I have found that MOST skinny barrels do better with a pressure point, but not all. Then again I think maybe some pressure points allow the barrel to "settle" in a slightly different spot after each shot throwing the harmonics off. That's just a theory I developed after sanding a few off only to build them back up again with different resultes.
 
Posts: 231 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 22 December 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'd be interested, as a potential customer, as to what work was done in regards to truing up the action. There isn't much info on their site in this regard.

Coot
 
Posts: 97 | Registered: 04 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
You guys have a good point on shooting it as is before free floating it. I can allways float it at the range if it does not shoot well enough. Cooter, just call the number on the web site, they are easy folks to work with.
I will probably order a rimrock stock in a few weeks. They say there should need very little fitting if any.
McMillan does not do a drop in style for the pre 64 feather weight, they could build me one but I would have to send them the rifle and that would be expensive. I figure if the rimrock needs any fitting I can have it done here ...tj3006
 
Posts: 129 | Location: Portland oregon | Registered: 12 May 2004Reply With Quote
<9.3x62>
posted
Quote:

McMillan does not do a drop in style for the pre 64 feather weight.




Actually, they do. It's called the "pre-64 Monte Carlo", and is an exact duplication of the pre-64 featherweight stock. I actually have one, very nice.

http://www.mcmfamily.com/mfsinc_n/winchester.html

It is the second item - they just don't call it the the featherweight, but that is what it is.

Also, regarding pressure points. With all due repect to the other posters, I've not found this to be particularly effective - a good float job (and bedding if needed) has always produced the best results for me.

Good luck.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Doc
posted Hide Post
I agree also with floating the barrel. I have a #1 countour Hart barrel 25.5" long on a Ruger .270 and it is free floating and I wouldn't have it any other way.

If you take a look at some Factory Rugers as well as other brands, like the Ruger stainless/black MKII M77, you may notice that the factory stock does press against the barrel in most If not all. THIS IS PLAN B! Plan A is to always float the barrel. And that is straight from the horses mouth at Ruger and Remington.

Between my brother and I, we've owned several featherwt. custom barrels, all freed.

WE also have several Pac-Nor barreled rifles.

Free float/free float/...say it with me...FREE FLOAT!
 
Posts: 7906 | Registered: 05 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
To clarify my point on the bedding of Featherweight barrels. When one gets such a combo together be it a factory stock or a new one with the barrel channel just a groove at that point it's easier to try it full bedded when the stock is either orginal or needs to be cut out.

Nothing is all that easy but a free floated barrel needs to have sufficiant clearance and it's not all plus plus what with the gap and stuff getting in there.

Then there is the fact that some barrels just don't shoot using plan "A"!
 
Posts: 5543 | Registered: 09 December 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia