Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
Does anyone have any info concerning experiences with either of these three calibers and Long Range (600 yards+) elk hunting???? "They who would give up an essential Liberty for Temporary Security, deserves neither Liberty or Security." ---Benjamin Franklin "SIC SEMPER TYRANNUS" | ||
|
One of Us |
Come on, NO experienced opinions? "They who would give up an essential Liberty for Temporary Security, deserves neither Liberty or Security." ---Benjamin Franklin "SIC SEMPER TYRANNUS" | |||
|
one of us |
I'm sure any of them would work for elk out to 600 yards. My hunting partner had a 338-378 weatherby that he used for long range moose here in alaska. We never could get it to shoot s good as we would have liked. I have a 338 RUM and use it for long range big game. 225gr accubond at 3140fps is a really good long range performer, and the 338-378 will beat that by 100fps or so. The 358-378 is supposed to be another really good one but I have not experience with them. The 338s will have better long range bullets than the 358 will. | |||
|
one of us |
I have shot caribou with the 338-378.I got mine at 450 yards.Then I let a friend shoot and he got two with one shot at same distance.I used Nosler 250 gr partitions.I loaded them with 109 grs of reloader 25 with Federal 215 mag primers.My cousin loaded some for me and weighed each charge and he shot a few .25 groups with my gun.I have two of them now in case I ever wear one out.Its important to clean these rifles around ever 60 rounds due to heavy powder fouling.Its a pain in the butt .I have a 5.5 x15 nikon on one and a 6.5x20 nikon on the other.I just got some bonded 325 gr bullets from a guy in Canada I am going to try.The web site longrangehunting.com is an awesome long range hunting site.They use 300 gr serria match kings.I have not shot anything with them but have loaded some .It didnt shoot as good as the nosler partitions.I think the serria 250 gr bt would be good too.I would stay with 250 gr or larger.There are alot of smaller grain bullets that will blow apart at 338-378 speeds.I get around 3100 fps with the 250 gr and 2800 fps with the 300 gr.I have not shot these 325gr yet but they look awesome.I think they will go around 2700 fps.I would shoot elk out to about 800 yards with the 250 nosler partitions no problem.It adds about 300 yards to a 338 win mags range.The long range hunter guys use 30" barrels to get around 3300fps from a 250 gr and 3000 fps with a 300 gr.The next step up from the 338-378 is the 408 or the 50 bmg.I like toting a 10 pound gun instead of a 30 pound one. | |||
|
One of Us |
What barrel length are you using, if you don't mind me asking? "They who would give up an essential Liberty for Temporary Security, deserves neither Liberty or Security." ---Benjamin Franklin "SIC SEMPER TYRANNUS" | |||
|
one of us |
Its the factory 26" with the acubrake muzzle break.It is very nice in the recoil dept.Its way easier to shoot than any 300 win mag I ever shot.It feels like a 270.The bad thing is you have to wear muffs while hunting ot stick in plugs.I have never shot it without the brake.If your building a 338-378 Weatherby for extreme long range I would probally with a 30" barrel.I got both of my Accumark 338-378s for $1000 each and I am shooting them till they wont shoot any more.They both shoot under an inch easily most of the time around 1/2".I tried one box of factory loads.They were the 200 gr noslers.They shot horrible.There were powder burns on the target at 40 yards.I think it was unburned powder.I bought a bunch of 416 Weatherby loads and deloaded them.I used the brass in my 338-378,the bullets in my 416 rem mag and the norma mpr powder in a bunch of my guns.I got the brass for around $1 each.Its the toughest brass i have ever seen.I have loaded brass up to 15 times.I like the 250 gr partitions best.I think there are probally some bullets just as good but when you get partitions to shoot .25 " groups and get partition penetration why change. | |||
|
One of Us |
I don't want a barrel longer than 28" to be honest. From what the gunsmith that I am talking to is telling me, that is plenty for that caliber. Powder selection is the important part, and I'll be using RL-22 since I have over 10 lbs of it (I bought a 20 lb case ). I'll be shooting 250gr. Barnes TSXs. BTW, the gunsmith GUARANTEES 1/2 MOA. "They who would give up an essential Liberty for Temporary Security, deserves neither Liberty or Security." ---Benjamin Franklin "SIC SEMPER TYRANNUS" | |||
|
one of us |
I used to have a 338-378. Mine always shot great, but I made the mistake of not putting my ear protection on just once when shooting with the brake. It was so loud, my ears actually hurt from the shot. Since I don't hunt with ear protection, I decided to try it without the break. The recoil was brutal. My 470 Capstick is more pleasant to shoot. I was able to get sub 1" groups both with and without the brake. It shot best with LOTS of RL25 and 250gr bullets at 3060fps. I think you will find the RL22 is just a bit fast, especially with the heavier bullets. | |||
|
One of Us |
I figured that RL-22 could be a bit fast........I've had several folks (gunsmith included) recommending RL-25, but I have at least 13 lbs. of RL-22. Interestingly, the Barnes manual (#3) notes 3024 fps with 103 grs. of RL-22.....and.....3042 fps with 110.5 grs. of RL-25 pushing a 250 grain X, so there can't be too much difference. Well, except for possibly a bit less muzzle blast with RL-22, and better efficiency with a shorter barrel. "They who would give up an essential Liberty for Temporary Security, deserves neither Liberty or Security." ---Benjamin Franklin "SIC SEMPER TYRANNUS" | |||
|
one of us |
My rifle was a Weatherby Accumark that came with a factory brake. I don't have any other rifles in the same caliber to compare to, but I have heard that the Weatherby stock design leave something to be desire when it comes to felt recoil. Other stock designs may not feel as punishing. I do my load development shooting off a Hart Benchrest since I have one and some some Benchrest shooting. The velocity I achieved was actual, measured over an Oehler 35P. If I remember correctly, I was using 109gr of RL25. I shot 250gr Hornady, Sierra and Partitions. They all shot about the same. I was never able to get that rifle to shoot lighter bullets as well as it shot the 250s. Your milage may vary, so don't use that as a starting load. | |||
|
one of us |
I always use reloader 25 and 109 grs is the maxium in my rifle with 250 gr bullets.I only shoot 250 gr or larger with this caliber.I loaded some 275 gr Kodiak bullets they shot good but nothing like the Nosler Partitions.I shot 100 grs of Reloader 25 with 300 gr bullets.I want to see how these custom 325 grs bullets shoot.I hope they are around 2700 fps.The factory accumark 338-378 is hard to beat.it has a 26" barrel and a 2" muzzle break.The remington Sendero in 338 ultra mag is pretty good if you can find one .I think the 338 ultra mag will disapear in another year or so.I have a bunch of brass for my Weatherby 338-378s.I deloaed and necked down some cheap 416 Weatherbys.It was hard work but the brass lasted forever.I would buy some reloader 25 powder.My rifle locked up with 112 grs of reloader 25.I got 3250 with that one shot but it was too hot.I got an ejector mark with 110 grs of reloader 25.The 109 grs of reloader 25 with Nosler partitions 250 gr and federal 215 primers shot .25 " at 100 yards and under an inch at 300 yards.I would not fool with lighter bullets in the 338-378.It will just wear your barrel out faster.I still have to see to believe about the 300 gr serria match king.The guys on longrangehunting.com shoot deer and elk out to 1000 yards or further.I just dont trust those bullets as much as they do.The bonded 325 grs I just got are $70 a box of 50 pretty spendy but awesome.I find myself hunting with my Weatherby Accumark 338-378 more than any other gun I have these days.I have gotten so use to it that even my 338 win mags seem small. | |||
|
One of Us |
I own a Bald Eagle "Slingshot" in cast iron since I do A LOT of bench rest shooting, but when the CZ550 in .416 Rigby recoiled, I had a hard time controlling if from the rest. That's why I put on the Harris bi-pod and shot prone. I know that sounds CRAZY , but it was just easer that way (for me anyway). "They who would give up an essential Liberty for Temporary Security, deserves neither Liberty or Security." ---Benjamin Franklin "SIC SEMPER TYRANNUS" | |||
|
One of Us |
I can't believe that Remington retired the Sendero. If they had not, I would have one of those in .338 Ultra and convert it to the .338 Edge caliber, and take the CZ550 in .416 Rigby that I have and turn it into a .470 Mbogo. I'll keep the Ruger RSM Rigby pretty much factory except for maybe some rear peep sights. If you don't mind me asking, what velocity were you getting with the 300 gr. bullets? "They who would give up an essential Liberty for Temporary Security, deserves neither Liberty or Security." ---Benjamin Franklin "SIC SEMPER TYRANNUS" | |||
|
one of us |
I don't think there is really any difference between the various cartridges you list. I prefer the 338-378 over the 358 because there is more bullet selection. I think it is the perfect elk rifle. I have a Harris Talon with a 28" barrel and no muzzle brake. This was the longest I felt I could use for hunting and I would rather have a longer barrel than 2" of muzzle brake. The recoil really isn't bad. The bare rifle weighs 8.5 pounds. I also have a 460 Weatherby barrel for it. If you think a 338-378 gets your attention shoot a 8.5 pound 460! I use 7828 and RL-25. I also plan to try Retumbo this summer. The 200 Nosler BT is very accurate and holds together well. The Barnes X's and Honady Interbond are also great bullets. | |||
|
One of Us |
"They who would give up an essential Liberty for Temporary Security, deserves neither Liberty or Security." ---Benjamin Franklin "SIC SEMPER TYRANNUS" | |||
|
One of Us |
Weatherby made 6 338/378's inthe 1960's but had no powder to take advantage of the case. I have been making custom guns out of it and the 338/378 Keith Thompson for about 20 years. I got the new Weatherby when it finally came out again. It is mild shooting with the factory MB, but I hunt withOUT the MB. It is accurate, but reloading gives you better ballistics. The Norma powders are not as good as the Powders available to us. That is just the opposite of the early years of powder for Weatherby guns. | |||
|
One of Us |
So how do you feel a heavy barreled (#6 contour, 27-28") CZ550 in .338-.378---imagine a BIG Remington Sendero---would be as far as recoil if built WITHOUT a brake??? Once again, I'm NOT recoil sensitive, BUT I'd like to do lots of LR practice with the rifle from the bench and a Harris bi-pod. Do YOU think I really need a brake??? "They who would give up an essential Liberty for Temporary Security, deserves neither Liberty or Security." ---Benjamin Franklin "SIC SEMPER TYRANNUS" | |||
|
one of us |
I've got a custom 338/378 Wby that I had built a few years ago after I got sick of the muzzle brake on my 30/378. I decided since I was going to have the barrel replaced, that I'd go ahead and step up in caliber. I had Shilen do the rebarrel and they did an excellent job. Finished length is 29". As for powders, I have found that RL25 is pretty much THE powder for the 338/378. RL22 is too fast. You won't get the full benefit of a longer barrel... it'll still be a screamer though. I should mostly lighter bullets, but they're very quick. 210's mostly... at 3500 fps (over an Oehler and a chrony). I actually got some 160 gr. Barnes X's up to 4000 fps. That was a hoot. My standard loads that I usually shoot for hunting though are either 200 gr. Nosler BT's at 3400 fps. or 210 gr. Swift Scirroco's at 3500. As for recoil, the gun with a heavier barrel now has really stout recoil... and I think it's made worse by the stock, I just don't think the shape is that good (some have argued otherwise). A friend of mine recently purchased a 300 RUM, and we shot that at the range a few weeks ago. It's a Sendero but still a couple of pounds lighter than my Mark V and the recoil from his gun was nothing compared to my Wby. I could shoot that RUM all day long... then again I DO shoot my Weatherby all day long... it just roughs you up a little more. | |||
|
One of Us |
Well, the removeable W'by brake is a very good thing. I cannot shoot a gun for someone else but I shall tell a story. I owned 3 378 German W'bys over the years and sold them all for some reason. The German guns were very light. They were relatively mild shooting for me but had brakes installed. I traded for a German light 378 withOUT a muzzle break. Now I am NOT recoil sensitive but HOLY SHIT that HURT! It was so bad I actually shot it again. STILL hurt. Now the 338/378 is heavier and very mild WITH the brake, but I have only shot it when hunting withOUT the brake, so I shall not comment on kick. But the W'by removeable brake is the best of all worlds and the cartridge is superb in my way of thinking. | |||
|
One of Us |
Kingfisher, that is a great looking, purpose built rifle!!! So recoil is stiff even with that much weight. BTW, even in the same styled rifle, I think the .338-.378 would recoil quite a bit MORE than a 300 RUM. Do you remember what COUNTOUR your rifle's barrel has? Thumpper470, I prefer the Holland Quick Discharge brake (I have one on my Holland .266 6mm Ackley on a Rem 700), but for this project I am considering a Vais brake since the sound level is "supposed" to be much lower. Sounds, no pun intended, like for a target gun a brake for this caliber would be preferred. "They who would give up an essential Liberty for Temporary Security, deserves neither Liberty or Security." ---Benjamin Franklin "SIC SEMPER TYRANNUS" | |||
|
one of us |
Woodsracer, I'm sorry it took me a couple of days to respond. I've been out of town fishing. To answer your question, yes, I remember the contour on the barrel. It's a Shilen #17 which was a special contour Shilen used to offer for Remingtons. Now that they've re-done their website it's not listed in their contour list, however I'm sure that they could still make it for you. I essentially told them I wanted the largest diameter they could turn out and still fit in the stock in the longest length they could make. That's what I ended up with. Anyway, recoil and weight aside I really enjoy hunting with it and it's the first thing I grab whenever I go. | |||
|
One of Us |
Thanks for the reply. Do you happen to know the diameter at the muzzle? "They who would give up an essential Liberty for Temporary Security, deserves neither Liberty or Security." ---Benjamin Franklin "SIC SEMPER TYRANNUS" | |||
|
one of us |
I can't believe I forgot to give the specifics. If I remember correctly the #17 was between a 5 1/2 and a 6. The diameter at the muzzle is .825 Regards, Tom | |||
|
One of Us |
That gives me a better idea what I'm looking at! Thanks!!! My 27", #6 is going to be H-E-A-V-Y. "They who would give up an essential Liberty for Temporary Security, deserves neither Liberty or Security." ---Benjamin Franklin "SIC SEMPER TYRANNUS" | |||
|
one of us |
I can imagine. My gun is somewhere around 12.5 lbs for the whole package. That's scope, bipod, etc. Add an extra pound for each round in the magazine. | |||
|
One of Us |
I'll probably be a 3/4 pound fatter! "They who would give up an essential Liberty for Temporary Security, deserves neither Liberty or Security." ---Benjamin Franklin "SIC SEMPER TYRANNUS" | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia