THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    280 AI Barrel Contour Recommendation

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
280 AI Barrel Contour Recommendation
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of Austin Hunter
posted
Building a 280AI for my daughter. Going with a 24" barrel. I want to balance accuracy with weight.

Thinking of a Lilja #1. Or any #2 barrel out there and then fluting it.

Thoughts? Lightest, stiffest barrel?


"Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" -- Ronald Reagan

"Ignorance of The People gives strength to totalitarians."

Want to make just about anything work better? Keep the government as far away from it as possible, then step back and behold the wonderment and goodness.
 
Posts: 3080 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 05 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
#2, no flutes.

Boyd's classic stock ground down for LOP. Limbsaver recoil pad.
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
For your daughter to carry all day Lilja #1 would be nice.
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Austin Hunter
posted Hide Post
Going to do two stocks - a 2.5-3 lb B&C or HS Precision with bottom metal and then 20-24 oz Carbon fiber ADL. Start with the heavier stock and first mountain hunt go light weight. I'm magnaporting the barrel.


"Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" -- Ronald Reagan

"Ignorance of The People gives strength to totalitarians."

Want to make just about anything work better? Keep the government as far away from it as possible, then step back and behold the wonderment and goodness.
 
Posts: 3080 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 05 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Yeah, magnaport is nice.
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
What bullet are you going to load for the rifle?
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Don't go to lite with the rifle or it will be a rattler to shoot.
#2 contour would balance the hs precision stock nice and still manageable to carry all day.
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Austin Hunter
posted Hide Post
Start with a 150 gr Scirocco and if that doesn't shoot, look at an Accubond or TTSX.

Starting with the new tem insensitive and anti-copper additives: RL-23, 26; IMR 4955 and 7977

Working the same powders and bullet for my 7 Mag right now. Will switch up on primers as well.


"Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" -- Ronald Reagan

"Ignorance of The People gives strength to totalitarians."

Want to make just about anything work better? Keep the government as far away from it as possible, then step back and behold the wonderment and goodness.
 
Posts: 3080 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 05 April 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
A Douglas no. 3 contour will weigh about 3 lbs. a no. 1 is too light as is a no. 2 IMO unless your want a 22" featherweight barrel. You can get your needed barrel contour and weight from the Brownells catalog..comes in real handy when figuring the weigh you need..


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42209 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Austin Hunter
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Atkinson:
A Douglas no. 3 contour will weigh about 3 lbs. a no. 1 is too light as is a no. 2 IMO unless your want a 22" featherweight barrel. You can get your needed barrel contour and weight from the Brownells catalog..comes in real handy when figuring the weigh you need..


I have 26" #2 barrel on my 7 Mag and it's perfect and shoots like the devil.


"Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" -- Ronald Reagan

"Ignorance of The People gives strength to totalitarians."

Want to make just about anything work better? Keep the government as far away from it as possible, then step back and behold the wonderment and goodness.
 
Posts: 3080 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 05 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Nakihunter
posted Hide Post
I am not sure what the contours mean.

My 280 AI is on Sako L61R and is a slim 24 inch rifle. It handles and balances surprisingly well and feels lighter than the 8 lbs before scope.

I strongly recommend a 1-9" twist barrel.

I have used 140gr to 160 gr bullets on deer and now I stick to 150 gr TSX & 160 gr Accubonds.

I get 3050 fps with the 160 gr Accubonds & the Nosler book load of N560. I pulled back half a grain on that max load.

The 140 gr bullets tear up too much meat and that is a real waste of good venison.


"When the wind stops....start rowing. When the wind starts, get the sail up quick."
 
Posts: 11388 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 02 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Nakihunter:
I am not sure what the contours mean.

My 280 AI is on Sako L61R and is a slim 24 inch rifle. It handles and balances surprisingly well and feels lighter than the 8 lbs before scope.

I strongly recommend a 1-9" twist barrel.

I have used 140gr to 160 gr bullets on deer and now I stick to 150 gr TSX & 160 gr Accubonds.

I get 3050 fps with the 160 gr Accubonds & the Nosler book load of N560. I pulled back half a grain on that max load.

The 140 gr bullets tear up too much meat and that is a real waste of good venison.


My vote goes to the 150 tsx with the option, then to break the front shoulder and lung on a bull elk. Which the 280 AI is certainly capable of doing.
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ted thorn
posted Hide Post
Why a .280AI ?


________________________________________________
Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper
Proudly made in the USA
Acepting all forms of payment
 
Posts: 7361 | Location: South East Missouri | Registered: 23 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Austin Hunter
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ted thorn:
Why a .280AI ?


Because.

Seriously, my daughter has a 7mm-08 now and I have a 7mm Mag (and many other rifles). I've always been fascinated with the 7mm cartridges and always loved the 280 Remington - it should have the spotlight, not the 270 Win. But I want a bigger step up from the 7mm-08 for my daughter - something she can use for elk, etc.


"Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" -- Ronald Reagan

"Ignorance of The People gives strength to totalitarians."

Want to make just about anything work better? Keep the government as far away from it as possible, then step back and behold the wonderment and goodness.
 
Posts: 3080 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 05 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of chuck375
posted Hide Post
280 AI is a really nice round. Ordinarily I'm a walnut/blued kinda guy, but we have a Rem XCR II in 375 Weatherby that weighs 7 1/4 lbs with scope. It has a 24" barrel, not sure what contour it is but it's pretty thin. With 375 H&H factory rounds it's a pussycat with 375 Weatherby it's a bit snappy. A 280 AI in a similar setup should be very manageable.


Regards,

Chuck



"There's a saying in prize fighting, everyone's got a plan until they get hit"

Michael Douglas "The Ghost And The Darkness"
 
Posts: 4797 | Location: Colorado Springs | Registered: 01 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Austin Hunter
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ar corey:
quote:
Originally posted by Nakihunter:
I am not sure what the contours mean.

My 280 AI is on Sako L61R and is a slim 24 inch rifle. It handles and balances surprisingly well and feels lighter than the 8 lbs before scope.

I strongly recommend a 1-9" twist barrel.

I have used 140gr to 160 gr bullets on deer and now I stick to 150 gr TSX & 160 gr Accubonds.

I get 3050 fps with the 160 gr Accubonds & the Nosler book load of N560. I pulled back half a grain on that max load.

The 140 gr bullets tear up too much meat and that is a real waste of good venison.


My vote goes to the 150 tsx with the option, then to break the front shoulder and lung on a bull elk. Which the 280 AI is certainly capable of doing.



TSX or TTSX don't have the BC of a 150 gr Scirocco or AB and those will do plenty to an elk. I may try the 150 gr TTSX if the Scirocco or ABs don't shoot well.

The 160 gr AB are also an option. I am worried about the punch through of TTSX. I shot an elk last fall at 373 yards with 300 Wby 180 gr TTSX at 3,250 fps. Zipped right through behind his left should and out the center of the right with a 30 yard blood spray behind. Oh, it was a kill shot, but before he ran around for a while. I'd much rather have something open up inside and stay. Similar incident in 2016 on an Aoudad, 330 yard shot with a 308 165 gr Aframe that threaded both shoulders and lungs. Didn't even expand. The ram died after running 40 yards, not blood trail.

Now, the 200 gr Accubonds in my 8x57 Mauser? Freakin' creamed 2 red deer, an elk, and a waterbuck. Boom, down. Did not exit.


"Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" -- Ronald Reagan

"Ignorance of The People gives strength to totalitarians."

Want to make just about anything work better? Keep the government as far away from it as possible, then step back and behold the wonderment and goodness.
 
Posts: 3080 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 05 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My 280 AI has a winny fwt contour, shilen barrel cut at 23". Built on a pre 64 M70 action, williams BM and a MCM edge stock. With a swaro Z3 it weighs 7 lbs. 15 oz. and balances just right. I load 150 TTSX's for everything.
 
Posts: 549 | Location: n.e.Mn | Registered: 14 October 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
For my 7x57 I went with a Douglas #2 and then had it milled to octagon. It is mighty thin, but I like it.


Larry

"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading" -- Thomas Jefferson
 
Posts: 3942 | Location: Kansas USA | Registered: 04 February 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Austin Hunter
posted Hide Post
Almost went with a Lilja #1, but my gunsmith and I thought that was a bit to thin and could cut into accuracy. I figure the rifle will finish under 8 lbs with a VX-2 3-9x33 and sling.


"Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" -- Ronald Reagan

"Ignorance of The People gives strength to totalitarians."

Want to make just about anything work better? Keep the government as far away from it as possible, then step back and behold the wonderment and goodness.
 
Posts: 3080 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 05 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Austin Hunter:
quote:
Originally posted by ar corey:
quote:
Originally posted by Nakihunter:
I am not sure what the contours mean.

My 280 AI is on Sako L61R and is a slim 24 inch rifle. It handles and balances surprisingly well and feels lighter than the 8 lbs before scope.

I strongly recommend a 1-9" twist barrel.

I have used 140gr to 160 gr bullets on deer and now I stick to 150 gr TSX & 160 gr Accubonds.

I get 3050 fps with the 160 gr Accubonds & the Nosler book load of N560. I pulled back half a grain on that max load.

The 140 gr bullets tear up too much meat and that is a real waste of good venison.


My vote goes to the 150 tsx with the option, then to break the front shoulder and lung on a bull elk. Which the 280 AI is certainly capable of doing.



TSX or TTSX don't have the BC of a 150 gr Scirocco or AB and those will do plenty to an elk. I may try the 150 gr TTSX if the Scirocco or ABs don't shoot well.

The 160 gr AB are also an option. I am worried about the punch through of TTSX. I shot an elk last fall at 373 yards with 300 Wby 180 gr TTSX at 3,250 fps. Zipped right through behind his left should and out the center of the right with a 30 yard blood spray behind. Oh, it was a kill shot, but before he ran around for a while. I'd much rather have something open up inside and stay. Similar incident in 2016 on an Aoudad, 330 yard shot with a 308 165 gr Aframe that threaded both shoulders and lungs. Didn't even expand. The ram died after running 40 yards, not blood trail.

Now, the 200 gr Accubonds in my 8x57 Mauser? Freakin' creamed 2 red deer, an elk, and a waterbuck. Boom, down. Did not exit.


How much BC do you need? 7mm TTSX out of an Ackley Improved has a BC of. 450
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Probably not going to shoot a 280 Improved past 500 yards anyway.
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Snellstrom
posted Hide Post
quote:
Don't go to lite with the rifle or it will be a rattler to shoot. #2 contour would balance the hs precision stock nice and still manageable to carry all day.


Where this BS comes from I can't imagine. Spoken like someone who only repeats what they've heard about light barrels.
I have at least 5 rifles with the thinnest lightest contour you can get and every one of them are absolute tack drivers.
I've heard it on this forum so many times and have to roll my eyes "light rifles don't shoot accurately", " light rifles don't balance right" " only an expert can shoot light rifles and make them group", blah blah blah from people who have no clue.
My ultra light barreled rifles produce exceptional 3 and 5 shot groups.
Go with the lightest contour you want in a good quality barrel (there are dozens of brands out there pick one) and don't listen to the babble about light contours.
She will carry it far more than shoot it.
Never in my life have I got to the top of a mountain and wished I'd have brought my "heavier" rifle...
 
Posts: 5604 | Location: Eastern plains of Colorado | Registered: 31 October 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Snellstrom:
quote:
Don't go to lite with the rifle or it will be a rattler to shoot. #2 contour would balance the hs precision stock nice and still manageable to carry all day.


Where this BS comes from I can't imagine. Spoken like someone who only repeats what they've heard about light barrels.
I have at least 5 rifles with the thinnest lightest contour you can get and every one of them are absolute tack drivers.
I've heard it on this forum so many times and have to roll my eyes "light rifles don't shoot accurately", " light rifles don't balance right" " only an expert can shoot light rifles and make them group", blah blah blah from people who have no clue.
My ultra light barreled rifles produce exceptional 3 and 5 shot groups.
Go with the lightest contour you want in a good quality barrel (there are dozens of brands out there pick one) and don't listen to the babble about light contours.
She will carry it far more than shoot it.
Never in my life have I got to the top of a mountain and wished I'd have brought my "heavier" rifle...


I was talking about the holding and aiming of a lite rifle. They shake. I once owned a Stevens 200 in 7mm Remington Magnum and I had to put sand in the stock to weight it down.
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Snellstrom
posted Hide Post
quote:
I was talking about the holding and aiming of a lite rifle. They shake. I once owned a Stevens 200 in 7mm Remington Magnum and I had to put sand in the stock to weight it down


The light rifle doesn't shake, you are shaking the rifle. It is an inanimate object incapable of any action on its own.
If it is shaking that is operator error.
For some magical reason I don't have any trouble with it or my kids (?)...
 
Posts: 5604 | Location: Eastern plains of Colorado | Registered: 31 October 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I agree completely with Dave on this one. If someone can't hold and aim a light rifle, then by all means don't buy one, but don't blame it on the rifle. Will they heat quicker, sure, but how many animals sit around waiting for you to take shots 4 or 5?

I have the aforementioned 7x57 with the #2 octagon, a Browning Micro-Medallion and a Colt Light Rifle. No problems.

Someone go try to tell Melvin Forbes that light rifles don't shoot. See how far that BS gets.


Larry

"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading" -- Thomas Jefferson
 
Posts: 3942 | Location: Kansas USA | Registered: 04 February 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My 280AI wears a sendero contoured barrel. It's a 1:8 twist so I can shoot the long VLD high BC bullets. Yes it's muzzle heavy but it's certainly not my heaviest rifle in my safe. If it were a dedicated hunting rifle I would go with a thinner barrel but stick with the same twist rate.
 
Posts: 743 | Location: Las Vegas | Registered: 23 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Nakihunter
posted Hide Post
I am no expert.

My Kimber Montana 7mm08 is 6 lbs with 2-8X Leupold. 5 lbs 3 oz bare.

It is a very accurate rifle and balances well. I have taken snap shots with it and even a crazy running shot at about 70 meters in a rocky gully on a galloping wallaby chased by a dog - which I may never repeat again in my life.


quote:
Originally posted by Snellstrom:
quote:
Don't go to lite with the rifle or it will be a rattler to shoot. #2 contour would balance the hs precision stock nice and still manageable to carry all day.


Where this BS comes from I can't imagine. Spoken like someone who only repeats what they've heard about light barrels.
I have at least 5 rifles with the thinnest lightest contour you can get and every one of them are absolute tack drivers.
I've heard it on this forum so many times and have to roll my eyes "light rifles don't shoot accurately", " light rifles don't balance right" " only an expert can shoot light rifles and make them group", blah blah blah from people who have no clue.
My ultra light barreled rifles produce exceptional 3 and 5 shot groups.
Go with the lightest contour you want in a good quality barrel (there are dozens of brands out there pick one) and don't listen to the babble about light contours.
She will carry it far more than shoot it.
Never in my life have I got to the top of a mountain and wished I'd have brought my "heavier" rifle...


"When the wind stops....start rowing. When the wind starts, get the sail up quick."
 
Posts: 11388 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 02 July 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Austin,
My suggestion was in regards to recoil, but then I have no idea the size or age of his daughter..for myself I would opt for a 1 or 2 Douglas contour at 22 inches..

I think the 7-08 is a great choice for most females, its a good killer, and recoil is ok most cases...I would hunt any NA animal with it, even the big bears with a 175 gr. nosler if I had too..

If she ever wounds and animal, you will lose your female hunting companion in most cases..


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42209 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
280 AI is a really nice round. Ordinarily I'm a walnut/blued kinda guy, but we have a Rem XCR II in 375 Weatherby that weighs 7 1/4 lbs with scope. It has a 24" barrel, not sure what contour it is but it's pretty thin. With 375 H&H factory rounds it's a pussycat with 375 Weatherby it's a bit snappy. A 280 AI in a similar setup should be very manageable.

Regards,

Chuck


Chuck, you have great taste.

I recommend a #2 contour; no fluting


 
Posts: 7158 | Location: Snake River | Registered: 02 February 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
ar corey
one of us
posted 29 April 2018 23:43 Hide Post
What bullet are you going to load for the rifle?
 
Posts: 1224 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006

I suggest giving the Barnes 145 LRX a shot.
 
Posts: 1324 | Registered: 17 February 2004Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    280 AI Barrel Contour Recommendation

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia