One of Us
| I would like to see it. I wouldn't trade in my CZ 9.3X62, but if it helps make the cartridge more popular that's all the better. Ruger having a 9.3X62 should make components, loading tools, load data etc. more common and easier to get. |
| | | Posts: 317 | Location: Texas Panhandle | Registered: 09 July 2006 | 
IP
|
|
one of us
| I am not a big Ruger fan, but would buy one in 9.3x62, just because. I agree with Rem720, that it would probably help to make 9.3x62 components easier to get, especially since they have partnered with Hornady. Fingers crossed. Lou
****************
NRA Life Benefactor Member
|
| | |
One of Us
| quote: Believe that would be fine offering if it comes about. Hope it is true.
totally agree! that caliber is an excellent performer and in a Ruger? what is not to like? |
| | | Posts: 1019 | Location: foothills of the Brooks Range | Registered: 01 April 2005 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| A 9.3 x 62 housed they way they do the 375 Ruger would be a very very good thing, they would sell quite a few rifles, I would even buy one. |
| | | Posts: 1070 | Location: East Haddam, CT | Registered: 16 July 2000 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Make it like the .375 with sights, and make a .338-06 or what the hell a .318 WR just like it.
A shot not taken is always a miss
|
| | | Posts: 2788 | Location: gallatin, mo usa | Registered: 10 March 2001 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| If I didn't have one being built already, I'd buy it if it was offered
If you think every possible niche has been filled already, thank a wildcatter!
|
| | |
One of Us
| And while they're in a 9.3 mood, I sure wish they would chamber one for the grand old 9.3x64. Ruger didn't need new calibers with their name on them. They just need to tool up for these golden oldies.
Hell, come to think of it, let's see a 8x68S too! |
| | |
