THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    175 grain SP penetration out of a 7 x 57 at low velocity

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
175 grain SP penetration out of a 7 x 57 at low velocity
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
Once again, this is not to start a "pissing' contest or an invitation to a mud slinging contest.

On another wild hair I got about downloading a 7 x 57 so that it might be mild enough for a kid or a recoil consciencious person to use in the field. I loaded up one yesterday and went out and just chronographed it to see what I might get.

26 grains of IMR 3031, in a Ruger bolt action gave me muzzle velocities of about 1750 fps with a 175 grain Remington Core Lokt bullet that I usually buy locally from a guy who carries them in bulk. They are good for chronographing ( cheap). Not a bad bullet for hunting either.

Instead of going across town to the range, I went out in the woods nearer to the house. A clearing I know of is about 150 yds across at its max. I used a tree of about 18 inches plus in diameter as a back stop, 100 yds away.

After I shot my seven rounds I had loaded and recorded, I walked over to the tree to see if any of the bullets had penetrated completely thru for curiousity's sake. To my SURPRISE all 7 bullets had gone completely thru the tree. Muzzle velocity had been averaging at 1750 fps.

High sectional density and low velocity still seem to do a decent job. Can't say if the bullets mushroomed to their full potential, but they definitely penetrated!

Two 160 grain Sierras in a 6.5 x 55 with a MV of 1900 fps also penetrated the tree completely.

Just passing on some interesting observations, that took me by surprise.
[Razz] [Roll Eyes] [Cool]
 
Posts: 2889 | Location: Southern OREGON | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
<9.3x62>
posted
Hi Seafire.

Just out of curiosity, what kind of tree and in what health? I've heard of the 6.5x55 160 gr FMC can penetrate 6 or so FEET of cured walnut at military ammo velocities (way more than 30-06 ball ammo).

I have had experiences to what you described using rounds of dry white (and black) ash and my 7mm BR (rifle). Beginning loads with 140 or heavier bullets that thing can shoot through an amazing amount of wood.

Clearly the bullets are expanding very little.

Have you made up a 250-3000 yet? You will like it... [Smile]

9.3
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
That�s interesting seafire. Generally speaking bullets that are stable at there lowest threshold velocity for expansion 1.5-2X diameters, will penetrate the deepest(aside from stable solids). Drive them faster... and they will penetrate less. Drive them slower... and they will tumble and penetrate less. There are many problems with this notion however... like it has to be a homogenized substance TO MAKE THE CASE comparable, the casual relation between velocity and penetration of hard materials, and that bones or heavy density changes can result in tumbling ESPECIALY if the bullet was fired at low velocity and not bleed-out from a higher velocity etc... Also... the X and fail-safes have a wider threshold for velocity and penetration. The nosler partition also will penetrate at similar depths over a wide range BECAUSE IT LOOSES ITS CORE quickly and isn�t using energy on malleable deformation, not because it has reached a greater diameter, as most people claim (trivial). Wood often envelopes a bullet enough to prevent it from tumbling.

Bla bla aside I go by a few rules on low velocity...
I wont shoot deer size game with any soft point that doesn�t have a 1/2 or less in diameter radius ogive/ellipses (or with a SWC or simlair nose profile), and is not above 35 caliber, unless it has a striking velocity of greater then 1500 fps or greater. Even at that close of a notch id have to seriously look at my set-up.
Id think a 140-175 7mm at 2250-2300 would make a great deer rifle. You will have to play with it more and tell us what you find.

[ 08-24-2003, 12:03: Message edited by: smallfry ]
 
Posts: 2045 | Location: West most midwestern town. | Registered: 13 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Hi seafire
Did you load with FMJ or SP?
those 6,5x55 loads famous for penetration are loaded with fmj steel jacket@2300-2400 fps.
regards
danny
 
Posts: 1127 | Location: Sweden | Registered: 19 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Well, lets see if I can answer questions put forth in the 3 posts above;

9.3 x 62: Naw, the 250 Savage is on my to do list. I am actually thinking about having a Mauser rebarreled to the 250 using a bull Barrel.
I hear some good accuracy experiences with it.

Sorry, don't know what type of tree it was, and I am not a horticulturalist. I can tell the difference between a hardwood and a conifer. Althought from swiping apples as a kid, I can pick out an apple tree a mile away!

Small Fry: You must be an engineer. However, according to the manual if the MV was 1750, it was still going over 1600 fps at 100 yds. I was surprised that the 175 grainer at least doesn't give up velocity as quick at low muzzle velocity as it does at higher muzzle velocity. This is the type of stuff I love to do, handloading. Experimenting. I am amazed at what I find out.
A lot of stuff that is contrary to " modern" ways of thinking.

If I do any more with the 7 mm bullets, I will post them.

Danny Pay: The bullet that I had loaded was the Sierra 160 grain Round Nose. That already has a reputation for a deep penetrating bullet. I am not aware personally of a source for the FMJ and really don't have much an application for it, unless I can target shoot with it cheaper than the jacketed bullets!

Everyone, take it easy and good luck hunting this fall.
[Razz] [Roll Eyes] [Cool]
 
Posts: 2889 | Location: Southern OREGON | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by seafire:
I was surprised that the 175 grainer at least doesn't give up velocity as quick at low muzzle velocity as it does at higher muzzle velocity.

Wind resistance increases with the square of velocity, more or less. Doubling the speed results in four times the wind resistance, hence four times the deceleration. Not sure how this relationship holds up at supersonic speeds.

[ 08-27-2003, 19:41: Message edited by: TomP ]
 
Posts: 14688 | Location: Moreno Valley CA USA | Registered: 20 November 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
In South Africa a few years ago, my brother Alvin used a 1895 Chilean Mauser 7x57 with 175 grain Nosler Partitions at about 2,400 fps to take everything from kudu to wildebeest. Longest shot was on the kudu at a measured 200 yards. We did not recover any bullets. One shot -- complete penetration -- on everything.

Hammer
 
Posts: 1003 | Registered: 01 December 2002Reply With Quote
<JOHAN>
posted
quote:
Originally posted by seafire:

High sectional density and low velocity still seem to do a decent job. Can't say if the bullets mushroomed to their full potential, but they definitely penetrated!


Amen, sectional density has made the old an tired rounds soo popular like the 6,5X55 and 7X57 or 9,3X62. With heavy bullets you do not only get high SD but also high BC (if it's not an really blunt bullet).

/ JOHAN

[ 09-03-2003, 22:05: Message edited by: JOHAN ]
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Yeah Johan:

high Sectional density. I sure miss the old 275 grain Semi Spitzer in the 338 bore from Speer.

It had a sectional density of like 348 or so, and a BC of 466 to 500 or so. ( forget the exact BC's but it was really high for a SSP).
It was a LONG bullet, just like the 160 grain 6.5 bullets.
[Frown] [Roll Eyes] [Cool]
 
Posts: 2889 | Location: Southern OREGON | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
<eldeguello>
posted
As I said on another thread, "Seafire, Ol' W.D.M. Bell once stated that the 175-grain 7mm solid round nose was the only bullet he had ever heard whistling away through the air after it had gone thru an elephant's head!!"

I think your experience, with a softnose, no less, supports this statement of the old poacher!!

I have also been impressed with the penetration (of trees!!) shown by the German military 198-grain 7.92X57IS load. A lot more than the U.S. G.I. M2 ball round!!
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I recall reading several times in Handloader or Rifle that most normal expanding bullets need about 2000 fps at impact to expand reliably. If you load up to the old military velocities around 2300 fps you should achieve that at any distance where a kid should be shooting. Wet or dry newspapers should tell you if you're getting expansion.

JF
 
Posts: 1246 | Location: Northern Virginia, USA | Registered: 02 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
/
 
Posts: 7857 | Registered: 16 August 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Alf, That is really amazing. Goes to show the good work that was done years ago and mostly forgotten-except to the few!
 
Posts: 1275 | Location: Fla | Registered: 16 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Wstrnhuntr
posted Hide Post
I wholeheartedly believe that WAY too much emphasis is placed on the big numbers game today and not nearly enough on real world experience where cartridge/bullet capabilities are concerned.

Alfs post is a shining example of how well some of yesteryears cartridges were concieved and how equally underrated they are today.
 
Posts: 10186 | Location: Tooele, Ut | Registered: 27 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Alf:

Excellent Move bringing up that info and sharing it with the Rest of Us.

WesternHunter:

Amen to far too many people base hunting on Numerical Statistics and not enough real world experience. It is almost a smaller and smaller crowd that knows that the older turn of the century stuff worked also. All we really have done is increase the "Range" potential of calibers/bore size, with major increase in recoil, which prevents many shooters from taking full advantage over that "increase in range".
Alot of these guys should really be carrying 243s and 30/30s.

Sort of like a catch 22.

Alf Once again Thanks! Eh??
[Razz] [Roll Eyes] [Cool]
 
Posts: 2889 | Location: Southern OREGON | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Well the magic load is a 175 gr 7mm or 160 gr 6.5mm is a MV of around 2400 fps. One of my favorite loads is a 175 gr. Nosler Partition out of a 7 mm x 57mm. I get around 2500 fps out of a Brno ZKK 600. My other is a 160 gr Hornaday RN in 6.5 x 55 at around 2500fps. Both loads will perform on game all out of proportion to what the paper numbers says they will do. I would and have hunted both elk and moose with both loads.
 
Posts: 1070 | Location: East Haddam, CT | Registered: 16 July 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
All this discussion warms my heart and eases any concerns I may have about my own 7x57, a little Brazillian Mauser carbine with an 18.5-inch barrel. I had a Lyman aperture sight mounted to the receiver and changed the original pyramid front sight to a blade. The load I normally use pushes a 175-grain Hornady Roundnose out at a little over 2,400 feet per second. I jokingly call this little Mauser my "Jungle Carbine". I've shot it a fair amount on paper but I haven't taken it out hunting yet.

One of these days...
 
Posts: 254 | Location: Vancouver, Canada | Registered: 10 April 2003Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    175 grain SP penetration out of a 7 x 57 at low velocity

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia