THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
6X on 300 H&H
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I'm thinking about putting a Leaupold VIII 6X on my Ruger #1 300 H&H.What do you guys think about this scope/gun combanation?Thank you
 
Posts: 74 | Location: out west | Registered: 20 November 2009Reply With Quote
One Of Us
Picture of KWard
posted Hide Post
I have a Leupold 6x on a Browning 78 single shot in 6mm. Works great for deer and varmits. What do you plan to use the No1 for?
 
Posts: 319 | Location: Arizona | Registered: 31 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
An old Weaver steel tubed K-6 was the only scope I had for many years.....It was on my .225 Winchester for prairie dogs and on my Rem 760 in .270 for deer hunting and again on my .375 H&H...

I used that scope on many guns with total satisfaction on every one of them. Woods and prairie and varminting.....It might not have been best for any of these tasks but served well at all of them.

There's nothing wrong with a straight 6X scope!

Today almost every scope I have is a Leopold variable....either 2-7 or 3-9.....and almost all the time they are set on 6X..... It's a good setting for me!


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Have a Leupold 6x on my Model 70 7x57. Works great.

Joe A.
 
Posts: 152 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 06 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of McKay
posted Hide Post
One of my favorite scopes is the swarovski 1-6X scope. My 300 H&H wears one. Shot 3 pronghorn antelope and one elk with it last year. Longest shot was 385 yards and did not think I was underscoped at all.....
Mac


Mac

 
Posts: 1747 | Location: Salt Lake City, UT | Registered: 01 February 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Six power was traditionally the go-to magnification for "open country" scopes before the days of dependable varibles came along. Most people used to consider it a little too much magnification for woods hunting or where shots might be jump shots or running shots.

But in my experience, if the gun's stock fits you well and the scope is mounted properly for your physiology, you'll have no trouble on fairly close shots with a 6x scope, particularly using the Leupold which has a rather non-critical eye placement. For longer shots, anything you would shoot with a .300 H&H looks plenty large enough at any distance you would care to shoot it when magnified six times. You'll be shooting at something between the size of deer and moose with an H&H, not ground squirrels, you know.

There are enough advantages with a fixed power scope to make it well worth considering: Lower price, less weight, tougher and less complex, fewer lenses, and never set at the wrong power when game presents itself. If you like it, go for it!
 
Posts: 13266 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
To add to my above post: once while hunting with above rifle and scope, I had held back the call of nature as long as I could indure. I stood up on my stand and commenced to rattle and water the leaves good. I looked off the end of my stand straight down and there stood a buck looking up at me. I tried to cut it off and couldn't. Then I eased around peeing on everything including the deer, I settled the crosshairs on the deer and all I could see was hair. I quickly raised the rifle up and back down to ascertain I has on the shoulder and fired, killing the buck. What can I say?

Joe A.
 
Posts: 152 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 06 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Michael Robinson
posted Hide Post
Great choice. tu2


Mike

Wilderness is my cathedral, and hunting is my prayer.
 
Posts: 13757 | Location: New England | Registered: 06 June 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have a leopould M8 6x on my 300 H&H number one at the present time. Works great with offset rings.


Matt
FISH!!

Heed the words of Winston Smith in Orwell's 1984:

"Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right."
 
Posts: 3296 | Location: Northern Colorado | Registered: 22 November 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
On a rifle with long range potential like the .300 H&H I prefer a variable with more power at the top end. I find more power to enable me to shoot more accurately. I like, at the least, a 3-9. On my .270, and a few other field rifles, I use a 4-14. Personally, I like to shoot a few varmints every year with my elk rifle. I guarantee if you can bust a ground hog at 3 or 400 yards with your .300, it won't be hard to connect on any big game.
 
Posts: 866 | Location: Western CO | Registered: 19 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have one. Stuck it on my walk around varmint rifle, a Ruger 77-22H. Great even at 200 yds.

Rich
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've switched over from having variables on hunting rifles to fixed 4x and 6x scopes.
I have an older Weaver K-6 on my Rem 722 in 222 mag, and it makes a perfect period set up for an old rifle. Nothing at all wrong with the K-6, and the one I got in a trade has no ring marks and looks just like it did when delivered new.




 
Posts: 5798 | Registered: 10 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mojave:
I'm thinking about putting a Leaupold VIII 6X on my Ruger #1 300 H&H.What do you guys think about this scope/gun combanation?Thank you


The 6x42 will easily get the 300H&H to the 1000yd line.
 
Posts: 414 | Registered: 17 January 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
larrys been drinking again...
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'd greedily take drinking,over being you...but who wouldn't?!!?
 
Posts: 414 | Registered: 17 January 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Austin Hunter
posted Hide Post
I'm taking a Weaver straight 6x as my backup scope to Alaska for my 300 RUM (Zeiss 3.5x10)

Have a 1.75x5 on my 375 H&H and it's good for a long way - 400 yards. Buddy of mine took a shot a baboon with it at 550 yards, elevation dead on, windage off (windy outside), that baboon moved really, really fast when that round plinked the rock next to him.


"Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" -- Ronald Reagan

"Ignorance of The People gives strength to totalitarians."

Want to make just about anything work better? Keep the government as far away from it as possible, then step back and behold the wonderment and goodness.
 
Posts: 3083 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 05 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've zero qualm with 6x glass on Critters to 800+.

+(grin)
 
Posts: 414 | Registered: 17 January 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of JLHeard
posted Hide Post
I have a VXII 3-9x40mm on my M70 .300 H&H. It has the LR Duplex. I absolutely love it. With 200grn NP's it is dead on.


It is not enough to fight for natural land and the west; it is even more important to enjoy it...So get out there and hunt and fish and mess around with your friends...

- Edward Abbey
 
Posts: 580 | Location: Mesa, AZ | Registered: 11 May 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have gravitated to higher magnifications as the years pass (and my eyes are still good).

In my youth I hunted with the 2.5-8, then moved to the 3.5-10. Now I think the 4.5-14 is the best scope for general (Western) hunting.

My 1957 M70 300 H&H has a 3.5-10 on it, but that is only because I do not have an extra 4.5-14 to replace it with.
 
Posts: 192 | Registered: 30 December 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have found that on hunting rifles a good variable with the option for low power is best ( at least for me ) I keep on lowest setting and will be raedy for any close encounter or moving animal close in. If the game is out far
you have time to move to a higher setting. I would go for a 1.5 0r 1.75 to 6 and all options will be covered.
 
Posts: 898 | Registered: 25 February 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BigBullet
posted Hide Post
I like it...perfecto!


BigBullet

"Half the FUN of the travel is the esthetic of LOSTNESS" Ray Bradbury
https://www.facebook.com/Natal...443607135825/?ref=hl
 
Posts: 1224 | Location: Lorraine, NY New York's little piece of frozen tundra | Registered: 05 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
When in open country, 6x is as good as is gets.
I myself, prefer a variable for big game. Even in open country one will find areas where a lower power can be a benefit. Seems there is always some compromise when hunting. I find myself at 5x most of the time with my Zeiss 3x9.
When I first started hunting in the 50´s the Weaver K6 was the standard for open country.
Worked well then as it will today.


"The lady doth protest too much, methinks"
Hamlet III/ii

 
Posts: 423 | Location: Eastern Washington State | Registered: 16 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JLHeard:
It has the LR Duplex


tu2
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia