One of Us
| An old Weaver steel tubed K-6 was the only scope I had for many years.....It was on my .225 Winchester for prairie dogs and on my Rem 760 in .270 for deer hunting and again on my .375 H&H... I used that scope on many guns with total satisfaction on every one of them. Woods and prairie and varminting.....It might not have been best for any of these tasks but served well at all of them. There's nothing wrong with a straight 6X scope! Today almost every scope I have is a Leopold variable....either 2-7 or 3-9.....and almost all the time they are set on 6X..... It's a good setting for me!
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." Winston Churchill
|
| Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Have a Leupold 6x on my Model 70 7x57. Works great.
Joe A. |
| Posts: 152 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 06 January 2006 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| One of my favorite scopes is the swarovski 1-6X scope. My 300 H&H wears one. Shot 3 pronghorn antelope and one elk with it last year. Longest shot was 385 yards and did not think I was underscoped at all..... Mac
Mac
|
| Posts: 1747 | Location: Salt Lake City, UT | Registered: 01 February 2007 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Six power was traditionally the go-to magnification for "open country" scopes before the days of dependable varibles came along. Most people used to consider it a little too much magnification for woods hunting or where shots might be jump shots or running shots.
But in my experience, if the gun's stock fits you well and the scope is mounted properly for your physiology, you'll have no trouble on fairly close shots with a 6x scope, particularly using the Leupold which has a rather non-critical eye placement. For longer shots, anything you would shoot with a .300 H&H looks plenty large enough at any distance you would care to shoot it when magnified six times. You'll be shooting at something between the size of deer and moose with an H&H, not ground squirrels, you know.
There are enough advantages with a fixed power scope to make it well worth considering: Lower price, less weight, tougher and less complex, fewer lenses, and never set at the wrong power when game presents itself. If you like it, go for it! |
| Posts: 13266 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| To add to my above post: once while hunting with above rifle and scope, I had held back the call of nature as long as I could indure. I stood up on my stand and commenced to rattle and water the leaves good. I looked off the end of my stand straight down and there stood a buck looking up at me. I tried to cut it off and couldn't. Then I eased around peeing on everything including the deer, I settled the crosshairs on the deer and all I could see was hair. I quickly raised the rifle up and back down to ascertain I has on the shoulder and fired, killing the buck. What can I say?
Joe A. |
| Posts: 152 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 06 January 2006 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Great choice.
Mike
Wilderness is my cathedral, and hunting is my prayer.
|
| |
One of Us
| I have a leopould M8 6x on my 300 H&H number one at the present time. Works great with offset rings.
Matt FISH!!
Heed the words of Winston Smith in Orwell's 1984:
"Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right."
|
| Posts: 3296 | Location: Northern Colorado | Registered: 22 November 2005 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| On a rifle with long range potential like the .300 H&H I prefer a variable with more power at the top end. I find more power to enable me to shoot more accurately. I like, at the least, a 3-9. On my .270, and a few other field rifles, I use a 4-14. Personally, I like to shoot a few varmints every year with my elk rifle. I guarantee if you can bust a ground hog at 3 or 400 yards with your .300, it won't be hard to connect on any big game. |
| Posts: 866 | Location: Western CO | Registered: 19 February 2004 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I have one. Stuck it on my walk around varmint rifle, a Ruger 77-22H. Great even at 200 yds.
Rich |
| |
One of Us
| I've switched over from having variables on hunting rifles to fixed 4x and 6x scopes. I have an older Weaver K-6 on my Rem 722 in 222 mag, and it makes a perfect period set up for an old rifle. Nothing at all wrong with the K-6, and the one I got in a trade has no ring marks and looks just like it did when delivered new.
|
| |
One of Us
| quote: Originally posted by mojave: I'm thinking about putting a Leaupold VIII 6X on my Ruger #1 300 H&H.What do you guys think about this scope/gun combanation?Thank you
The 6x42 will easily get the 300H&H to the 1000yd line. |
| |
One of Us
| larrys been drinking again... |
| |
One of Us
| I'd greedily take drinking,over being you...but who wouldn't?!!? |
| |
One of Us
| I'm taking a Weaver straight 6x as my backup scope to Alaska for my 300 RUM (Zeiss 3.5x10) Have a 1.75x5 on my 375 H&H and it's good for a long way - 400 yards. Buddy of mine took a shot a baboon with it at 550 yards, elevation dead on, windage off (windy outside), that baboon moved really, really fast when that round plinked the rock next to him.
"Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" -- Ronald Reagan
"Ignorance of The People gives strength to totalitarians."
Want to make just about anything work better? Keep the government as far away from it as possible, then step back and behold the wonderment and goodness.
|
| Posts: 3083 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 05 April 2006 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I've zero qualm with 6x glass on Critters to 800+.
+(grin) |
| |
one of us
| I have a VXII 3-9x40mm on my M70 .300 H&H. It has the LR Duplex. I absolutely love it. With 200grn NP's it is dead on.
It is not enough to fight for natural land and the west; it is even more important to enjoy it...So get out there and hunt and fish and mess around with your friends...
- Edward Abbey
|
| Posts: 580 | Location: Mesa, AZ | Registered: 11 May 2001 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I have gravitated to higher magnifications as the years pass (and my eyes are still good).
In my youth I hunted with the 2.5-8, then moved to the 3.5-10. Now I think the 4.5-14 is the best scope for general (Western) hunting.
My 1957 M70 300 H&H has a 3.5-10 on it, but that is only because I do not have an extra 4.5-14 to replace it with. |
| |
One of Us
| I have found that on hunting rifles a good variable with the option for low power is best ( at least for me ) I keep on lowest setting and will be raedy for any close encounter or moving animal close in. If the game is out far you have time to move to a higher setting. I would go for a 1.5 0r 1.75 to 6 and all options will be covered. |
| |
one of us
| |
| Posts: 1224 | Location: Lorraine, NY New York's little piece of frozen tundra | Registered: 05 July 2003 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| When in open country, 6x is as good as is gets. I myself, prefer a variable for big game. Even in open country one will find areas where a lower power can be a benefit. Seems there is always some compromise when hunting. I find myself at 5x most of the time with my Zeiss 3x9. When I first started hunting in the 50´s the Weaver K6 was the standard for open country. Worked well then as it will today.
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks" Hamlet III/ii
|
| Posts: 423 | Location: Eastern Washington State | Registered: 16 March 2006 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| quote: Originally posted by JLHeard: It has the LR Duplex |
| Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada. | Registered: 22 August 2006 |
IP
|
|