THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Bull barrel Hawkeyes...
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
apparently Ruger has opted to build the Hawkeye 375 Ruger with a heavy barrel. The June, American Rifleman came in todays mail, and the report states that "The 23" long barrel tapers from 2.93" at the receiver to 1.69" at the muzzle...". Recoil should be pretty easy on the shoulder...if you can hold the rifle and fire it!

Rich
DRSS
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Heat
posted Hide Post
At 7 and 3/4 lbs I don't see that as being terribly heavy... My Weatherby weighs more then that....

It's not exactly your backpack, carry for 20 miles rifle but it doesn't seem out of line to me for something you might have to carry for a few miles...

Ken....


"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so. " - Ronald Reagan
 
Posts: 5386 | Location: Phoenix Arizona | Registered: 16 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Masterifleman
posted Hide Post
Sharpshooter - I too questioned those dimensions and a number of other obvious boo-boos in that article. If the barrel at the receiver was 2.92", it would be larger in diameter than the receiver. The author should get better proof readers.


"I ask, sir, what is the Militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effective way to enslave them" - George Mason, co-author of the Second Amendment during the Virginia convention to ratify the Constitution
 
Posts: 1699 | Location: San Antonio, TX | Registered: 14 April 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Heat:

read the quote on barrel dimension!!

Rich
DRSS
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Heat
posted Hide Post
Yeah Rich, I did after the next post... Then, once I let the numbers sink in, I thought "GEEZ what the ???"... Yeah, something is definitly a typo there somewhere.... Sounds like a barrel you would use to chamber a 20 or 30 mm round Big Grin...

I didn't think it was worth updating my post but perhaps I should have....

Ken....


"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so. " - Ronald Reagan
 
Posts: 5386 | Location: Phoenix Arizona | Registered: 16 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
It appears many are so anxious to quickly print something on the hot new Ruger that some mistakes are making it into the published articles.

To put the barrel contour into perspective, the 375Ruger shares the same contour as the mkII 338WM out to the forend. The 375Ruger will drop into any stock inletted to fit the factory 338. Mine sits in an older 338WM take-off "canoe paddle" stock.

GVA
 
Posts: 1190 | Registered: 11 April 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by GaryVA:
It appears many are so anxious to quickly print something on the hot new Ruger that some mistakes are making it into the published articles.

To put the barrel contour into perspective, the 375Ruger shares the same contour as the mkII 338WM out to the forend. The 375Ruger will drop into any stock inletted to fit the factory 338. Mine sits in an older 338WM take-off "canoe paddle" stock.

GVA


Makes it easy if one desired an after market stock.
"tongue in cheek": a 3" to 2" tapered 23" barrel would have NO KICK!! Also no carritibilty! (does that word exist?)
 
Posts: 3785 | Location: B.C. Canada | Registered: 08 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Heat,

thought a second glance would get you scratching your head like I did.

Rich
DRSS
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Clayman
posted Hide Post
Looks like you could shoot that badboy all day without worrying about it heating up! HAHA! clap

1.69"?! Do the new Hawkeyes come with a turret as well?


_____________________________________________________
No safe queens!
 
Posts: 1225 | Location: Gilbertsville, PA | Registered: 08 December 2005Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
I read that article, I figured those measurements were the circumference.

The diameters would be 0.93 at the receiver and 0.54" at the muzzle.
 
Posts: 20 | Location: USA | Registered: 24 September 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Idaho Sharpshooter:
apparently Ruger has opted to build the Hawkeye 375 Ruger with a heavy barrel. The June, American Rifleman came in todays mail, and the report states that "The 23" long barrel tapers from 2.93" at the receiver to 1.69" at the muzzle...". Recoil should be pretty easy on the shoulder...if you can hold the rifle and fire it!

Rich
DRSS


you know if you use 29.3mm and 16.9mm you come demn close. maybe someone was playing with the 'mode' button on their digitl calipers
 
Posts: 344 | Registered: 28 May 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
yeah, except one would expect a barrel with a 3/8" diameter hole in it to have at least a 1 1/8" diameter at the receiver...?

Rich
DRSS
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Idaho Sharpshooter:
yeah, except one would expect a barrel with a 3/8" diameter hole in it to have at least a 1 1/8" diameter at the receiver...?

Rich
DRSS


29.3mm and 16.9mm is 1.154" and 0.665" respectively, which, without haveing a hawkeye and set of calipers in front of me, I suspect is demn close
 
Posts: 344 | Registered: 28 May 2004Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia