THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
35 Whelen and Crossbolts???
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of RenegadeRN
posted
I was wondering how many who have this cal have crossbolts install in their version? As some know (even though lead time is now a little longer) I am going to be taking possession of a new Mauser actioned 35 Whelen in the near future. As much as I would LOVE to find the right wood, etc. for it I am initially putting it into a laminated stock that will be bedded and barrel free floated from the get go. For those in the know...do you think it wise to have crossbolts installed in this laminate stock? Eventually in a walnut stock? The gunsmith I am having built the rifle says that it will be fine without crossbolts in a laminated and bedded stock. Just wondering is all...I CAN hardly wait. I have been chomping at the bit for this rifle more than any other I have owned, except say for my 270.

RRN


'I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisable, with liberty and justice for all.'
 
Posts: 171 | Location: Eastern North Carolina | Registered: 29 March 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I agree with your gunsmith in not needing crossbolts in your stock, Whelen recoil is not that rough.


Leftists are intellectually vacant, but there is no greater pleasure than tormenting the irrational.
 
Posts: 2899 | Registered: 24 November 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Dr. Lou
posted Hide Post
Although I am not an expert, the recoil from my Whelen is not much more than an 06. Remington and Ruger didn't put crossbolts in their rifles. However, I believe my Sako in 9.3x62 has two crossbolts, but I don't think they're necessary. If you want them, it can't hurt to have them installed. Kind of an insurance policy. Lou


****************
NRA Life Benefactor Member
 
Posts: 3316 | Location: USA | Registered: 15 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Iron Buck
posted Hide Post
I have 2 whelens. Here is my latest. Crossbolts not needed Smiler

 
Posts: 813 | Location: Wexford PA, USA | Registered: 18 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
Even a well glass bedded .375 H&H can survive without cross bolts.

They do give the gun a special look however andf they're really not very expensive.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
FWIW, my 338-06 is built on a M77. It is glass beded into a laminated stock. After many 100rds thru it, the recoil lug (glass bedded) split along the lamination. I had my gunsmith install crossbolts front & rear after that. It may or may not but they look great & they are like a belt & supsenders.thumb If you shoot 250gr & up alot, why not?


LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT!
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
won't hurt anything and is an added degree of strength, but no need, the 35 Whelen does not generate enough recoil to really justify cross bolting in a properly bedded stock, even in a walnut stock..

I like the looks of crossbolts however as I think they add to the overall appearance of a hunting rifle, and installation is not costly.


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42232 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia