THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
M54 vs. M70
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of cal pappas
posted
Gents:
I don't know where this belongs so if it needs to be moved, just let me know where it ends up.

I am looking for an older .30-06 and like the looks of the Winchester models 54 and 70.

Can you fellas, with your vast knowledge, tell me the difference between the two and also if the 54 should be avoided.

I want and original rifle, shooter grade, just for fun and a small amount of hunting. I have two early Weatherby rifles in .270 WCF and 300 Wby that I will sell (both with 3-digit serial numbers) as would prefer an '06.

Thanks for your help.
Cal


_______________________________

Cal Pappas, Willow, Alaska
www.CalPappas.com
www.CalPappas.blogspot.com
1994 Zimbabwe
1997 Zimbabwe
1998 Zimbabwe
1999 Zimbabwe
1999 Namibia, Botswana, Zambia--vacation
2000 Australia
2002 South Africa
2003 South Africa
2003 Zimbabwe
2005 South Africa
2005 Zimbabwe
2006 Tanzania
2006 Zimbabwe--vacation
2007 Zimbabwe--vacation
2008 Zimbabwe
2012 Australia
2013 South Africa
2013 Zimbabwe
2013 Australia
2016 Zimbabwe
2017 Zimbabwe
2018 South Africa
2018 Zimbabwe--vacation
2019 South Africa
2019 Botswana
2019 Zimbabwe vacation
2021 South Africa
2021 South Africa (2nd hunt a month later)
______________________________
 
Posts: 7281 | Location: Willow, Alaska | Registered: 29 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Cal,

For me the major difference is the M54 has the front screw into the recoil lug instead of the bedding platform and for me that is a big negative. The M70 is the top bedding configuration. The Post 63 M70 is a longer action than Pre 64 and M54.
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If my memory is correct the 54's have sheet steel bottom metal vs, the 70's milled trigger guard and hinged floor plate.

The triggers are also significantly different. On the 54 the trigger is the bolt stop while the 70 has a separate bolt stop.

On the 54 the bolt and safety are not scope friendly but by the time the 70 was introduced scopes were more popular and the 70's bolt and safety worked much better with a scope. As the years went on the 70's safety was updated to be even more scope friendly.
 
Posts: 161 | Location: Dallas area | Registered: 07 October 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The model 54 has sheet metal triggerguard and floorplate - non-hinged.

The M54 is a good gun but not a model 70. The 54 as made is not very scope friendly and has a two stage trigger.

Parts to upgrade a M54 to be more scope friendly are very scarce. Changing the trigger to something else is also a chore and as with the other parts, triggers are very hard to find.

Then if you take into account the very early M54's they are even harder to upgrade the trigger.

If you buy a 54 you better like it as it is because it will be very hard to get it close to a model 70. But, if you found one that already had a Buehler or other low scope safety installed with the bolt handle bent lower and possibly a Timney or other aftermarket trigger installed that would be a nice gun. Most require a screw in a peep sight hole to be the bolt stop when changing the triggers from 2-stage factory.

It is much easier to convert a military mauser than to convert an M54.

Buy a beater M70 and be happy!


PA Bear Hunter, NRA Benefactor
 
Posts: 1625 | Location: Potter County, Pennsylvania | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Cal: I've got both. M54 is .30 WCF (30-30) and M70 in .270. Let me know if I can be of help if you want to look them over. I'm sure they're in the safe somewhere.
 
Posts: 288 | Registered: 25 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cal pappas
posted Hide Post
Thanks for the information, gentlemen. As usual AR's finest come through. Perhaps for my intended use, an older model 70 is the ticket.

Cal


_______________________________

Cal Pappas, Willow, Alaska
www.CalPappas.com
www.CalPappas.blogspot.com
1994 Zimbabwe
1997 Zimbabwe
1998 Zimbabwe
1999 Zimbabwe
1999 Namibia, Botswana, Zambia--vacation
2000 Australia
2002 South Africa
2003 South Africa
2003 Zimbabwe
2005 South Africa
2005 Zimbabwe
2006 Tanzania
2006 Zimbabwe--vacation
2007 Zimbabwe--vacation
2008 Zimbabwe
2012 Australia
2013 South Africa
2013 Zimbabwe
2013 Australia
2016 Zimbabwe
2017 Zimbabwe
2018 South Africa
2018 Zimbabwe--vacation
2019 South Africa
2019 Botswana
2019 Zimbabwe vacation
2021 South Africa
2021 South Africa (2nd hunt a month later)
______________________________
 
Posts: 7281 | Location: Willow, Alaska | Registered: 29 June 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
"Older model 70"...........FWIW, the rear receiver bridge on 54s and prewar 70s was not D&T'd. Have a very nice prewar SG '06 that was aftermarket D&T'd for scope. Functional, but lost most collector value.
 
Posts: 670 | Location: Dover-Foxcroft, ME | Registered: 25 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Charles_Helm
posted Hide Post
What they said -- the M70 already has things you might want to try to change on the 54, and changing might be difficult. If you are using a scope, the "Monte Carlo" style pre-64 stock is easier for me than the 54 or earlier M70 stocks with a lot more drop.
 
Posts: 8773 | Location: Republic of Texas | Registered: 24 April 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of 458Win
posted Hide Post
Cal, I may have a M54 for you


Anyone who claims the 30-06 is ineffective has either not tried one, or is unwittingly commenting on their own marksmanship
Phil Shoemaker
Alaska Master guide
FAA Master pilot
NRA Benefactor www.grizzlyskinsofalaska.com
 
Posts: 4210 | Location: Bristol Bay | Registered: 24 April 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have both, I actually like my 54 30-06 as well as my MOd. 70 pre 64 30-06. The 54 is lean and mean with that schnable stock, and just feels good and shoots great, I did add a mod. 70 safety...cost wise they are pretty close these days..The 54 does have a sheet metal bottom metal, but that bothers me not, its action is slicker, the 70 has a better trigger pull but again it bothers me not..Its just a hunting rifle and a good one..points like a boss shotgun.

My cousin has a 54 carbine, and I love it, but he won't part with it...

I know you well enough to know your nostalgic self will like a 54.

BTW many of the mod. 70s have that forend screw as does the mod 54,and its great for adding or releasing pressure on the barrel and making them shoot better..not to mention assisting in avoiding barrel movement.My favorite model 54 has the schnable forend and the slimmer stock, shoots an inch or under for 3 shots and overlapping those 3 shots over a day of group shooting it apparantly shoots under an inch for 5 shots. Im sure you will like both I do..


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42210 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia