THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
VX3 2.5-8x36 or 3.5-10x40
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Can anyone give me an idea on the merits of either scope on a 243 sako. Mainly bush hunting with longer shots to 250m. I am swinging toward the 2.5-8x36 due to its more compact size.
 
Posts: 56 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 01 March 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Dr. Lou
posted Hide Post
FWIW, I would go with the 3.5-10 on a 243 unless it's a compact rifle and the larger scope would make look or feel unbalanced. Also, it depends on what you're going to hunt and the terrain. If you're going to primarily hunt coyotes and deer size critters and your shots are under 250-300 yards, I'd go with the 2.5-8. I like as small of a scope as possible. Lou


****************
NRA Life Benefactor Member
 
Posts: 3316 | Location: USA | Registered: 15 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I own both these scopes....they are excellent.

If you feel you will use the 2.5 power setting for the type of hunting you do, the smaller one will suit nicely. It might be more use on a stand or in thick brush.

I would probably get the 3.5-10 X 40, but I prefer a bit more power for longer shots.

Either is available with the B&C reticle if you are interested. (Both mine are this type.)

Cheers,

Dan
 
Posts: 430 | Location: Anchorage, AK | Registered: 02 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Honestly, I don't think you will go wrong with either.

I have used both, and to be honest can't tell the difference in hunting situations.

I have the 2.5x8's on my lightweight Remington 700's w/synthetic stocks in 270 win and 338-06.

I have a 3.5x10 on my custom Kimber in 270 Win.

Go with what looks good on the rifle.
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Tommo.
Gidday Mate,
Go for the 2.5-8x it's the one I have. At the lower setting it's great for the bush at the top end it will give you more magnification than you will ever need.
 
Posts: 1374 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Iron Buck
posted Hide Post
I have both scopes. I much prefer the 2.5-8x for all my hunting. It can do everything I need from close shots to elk at 300-400 yards. I have never needed more.
 
Posts: 813 | Location: Wexford PA, USA | Registered: 18 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I also have both.
I really like the 2.5X8 , can't think of a better choice for a short to medium range rifle.
...tj3006


freedom1st
 
Posts: 2450 | Registered: 09 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Cheers fellas
The 2.5-8x36 it is. Now I'll need to order one...
 
Posts: 56 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 01 March 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cazador2
posted Hide Post
I have both scopes and for brush shots the 2.5-8 X 36 is better since it remains focus in 2.5 power at five steps, the 3.5 –10 will need ten steps.
Also go for the Boone & Crockett reticule, I use mainly Remington’s 90 grain Scirocco and Federal’s 100 grain Sierra Game King factory ammo sighted as follow:

For Scirocco’s, Zero at 180 yards, having your max. difference between your reticules and your bullet drop of only 1 inch between 93 and 131 yards.

GROUP ZERO
YARDS A 180 DIF.
200 0.00 -0.70 0.70
300 -6.88 -7.40 0.52
400 -20.11 -20.10 -0.01
450 -29.50 -29.10 -0.40
500 -40.95 -40.00 -0.95

For Sierra’s GK, zero at 200 yards, having your max. difference between your reticules and your bullet drop of only 1.6 inches between 100 and 138 yards.

GROUP ZERO
YARDS A 200 DIF.
200 0.00 0.00 0.00
300 -6.88 -7.00 0.12
400 -20.11 -20.30 0.19
450 -29.50 -29.70 0.20
500 -40.95 -41.20 0.25
 
Posts: 71 | Registered: 10 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cazador2
posted Hide Post
And if you want even more options of distances you can use the space between reticules as shooting device.

Caliber 243 SCIR 90 GNS LARGE T. ZERO 180
YARDS RETICLE RET. DROP BULLET D. DIFERENCE
200 1° 0.00 -0.7 0.70
250 1°/2° -2.87 -3.4 0.53
300 2° -6.88 -7.4 0.52
350 2°/3° -12.81 -13.0 0.19
400 3° -20.11 -20.1 -0.01
425 3°/4° -24.61 -24.4 -0.21
450 4° -29.50 -29.1 -0.40
475 4°/5° -35.02 -34.3 -0.72
500 5° -40.95 -40.0 -0.95
MAX. DIF. BETWEEN 97 YDS 135 YDS 1.20 INCH


Caliber 243 SIER GK 100 LARGE T. ZERO 200
YARDS RETICLE RET. DROP BULLET D. DIFERENCE
200 1° 0.00 -0.4 0.40
250 1°/2° -2.87 -2.8 -0.07
300 2° -6.88 -7.0 0.12
350 2°/3° -12.81 -12.8 -0.01
400 3° -20.11 -20.3 0.19
425 3°/4° -24.61 -24.8 0.19
450 4° -29.50 -29.7 0.20
475 4°/5° -35.02 -35.2 0.18
500 5° -40.95 -41.2 0.25
MAX. DIF. BETWEEN 100 YDS 138 YDS 1.60 INCH
 
Posts: 71 | Registered: 10 January 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Tommo:
Cheers fellas
The 2.5-8x36 it is. Now I'll need to order one...


That's the right choice for a well proportioned medium-action rifle. Unless you are shooting small vermin at more than 200 yards, you have all the magnification you can use. The next-best (virtually equal) choice would be a VX-II 2-7x33.
 
Posts: 13266 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
I have VXIII 2.5x8 on all of my big game rifles, it's all I've ever need for shots out to 350yds or so. Under 300yds, I don't like the extra size & wt. You could also go w/ a 3x-9x compact?


LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT!
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Tommo,
Hunting&Fishing were offering them at a good price in there latest catalogue. thumb
 
Posts: 1374 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks guys

I have just ordered a 2.5-8x36. Didn't have alot of choice really as my 1 year old son managed to pull my rifle scope first (VX2 3-9) onto the kitchen floor (tiles). This all happend 1 foot away from me while in pulled my boots on to go outside! Need less to say he scope needs to be sent back to Leupold because it won't hold zero anymore. All my fault...
 
Posts: 56 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 01 March 2008Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia