I have hade several 243's and like them for fox and such, but I like the 25's a whole lot better for the deer sized things. Depending on what you intend to use this on, I would pick the 25-06 over the 243. If you intend to hunt nothing larger than deer, the 257 robberts is another great option.
You will have more flexibility with the .25-06 Rem. than with the .243 Win.. You can load the .25-06 down for varmints if wanted or up to velocities just under the .257 Weatherby. Best all around caliber going today. The Savage is showing to be one of the most accurate rifles out of the box going today. I'm thinking about getting one myself in one of the WSM cartridges, most likey the .270 WSM. Lawdog
Posts: 1254 | Location: Northern California | Registered: 22 December 2002
If it's your first rifle i would go for a 243! Nice caliber to learn shooting with and.. reasonable prices for the ammo. If not take the 25 06, a lot of rifle and capable for 70% of most of the normal hunting possibilities.
Dirk Scout from Flanders
Posts: 149 | Location: Belgium | Registered: 28 May 2003
Thanks for the opinions guys. I already have a 22 mag, 22-250, 30-30 Win, British 303, Mauser in 8X57, 30-06 and a 300 Rum. So based on the answers I'll probably opt for the 25-06.
Posts: 257 | Location: Torrance, Ca | Registered: 02 July 2002
The 25-06 is head and shoulders over any 6mm..It is simply much more powerful, has more bullet weight and cross section..it is very close to a .270 in killing power...
Posts: 42190 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000
I have taken a lot of deer and a bunch of feral hogs with the 6MM Remington and can't see how a 270 would have made any difference much less a 25-06 with the same hits. I started out using Sierra's 85 grain BTHP and Hornady's 87 grain flat base soft point with great results on deer. Wyoming Mulies and Texas Whitetails. When my Texas property was invaded with feral hogs I went to Hornady and Remington 100 grain bullets and then to Noslers as the hogs got over 250 pounds. The truth is with good hits the game can't tell what hit them.
How about on the lighter side? My targets would be small to medium game, thin-jacketed projectiles? Need a hillside long-range tool. I am looking at the 6mm Rem, VS. 25-06. The reload factor leans more 6mm. The long-range power is yet to be seen.
The 25-06 is noisier and burns more powder for sure. When I go back to Wyoming to deer hunt I am surrounded by hunters toting 25-06's and they are good rifles. To a man though they all have 223's and 22-250's for varmints. They shoot elk with those rifles too. I think if I was going to cover these bases I'd at least get a .270 with the 223. Deer and varmints the 243/6MM Rem would be the best choice.