One of Us
| Lou, I've heard the same issue numerous times on several forums. With today's scope design often adding a turret on the left side for parallax or illumination, that kills the 90 degree tilt option in mounting the scope. I haven't heard of a fix yet, but one would think that a gunsmith would be able to change the angle of ejection with some modifications. |
| Posts: 20181 | Location: Very NW NJ up in the Mountains | Registered: 14 June 2009 | ![Reply With Quote Reply With Quote](https://forums.accuratereloading.com/groupee_common/ver1.3.7.2147483647/platform_images/blank.gif)
IP
|
|
One of Us
| LJS,I had the same problem. I traded off a Model 85 in 25-06 because of that. I had to have the scope in high or extra high rings to clear the spent rounds. My 85 in .308 does not have any issues. I have heard the Gre Tan rifles has a spring kit and possible a recommendation on the extractor to get you fixed up with the 06 based rounds. It is a problem though for sure. It would be nice if they could get that ejector away from the 6 O'clock position for sure. |
| |
One of Us
| I had the same problem with a Sako AV. Took me a bit to figure it out. I went back to an older Leupold Vari-X III scope with a 1 inch tube. They have small windage adjustments which solved my problem. |
| |
One of Us
| I put a VX3 on it and it just would not work. If I slammed the bolt back very firmly, the case would bounce off the bottom of the windage knob before falling out. It was really nicking the scope bottom. I can live with This one but I would like to rig up a gun for long range shooting. It reminds me of the old saying “one time shame on you, two times shame on me”. |
| Posts: 3073 | Location: Pittsburgh, PA | Registered: 11 November 2004 | ![Reply With Quote Reply With Quote](https://forums.accuratereloading.com/groupee_common/ver1.3.7.2147483647/platform_images/blank.gif)
IP
|
|
One of Us
![Picture of Labman Picture of Labman](https://forums.accuratereloading.com/evefiles/avatars/1/2/4/124107371/avatar.jpg)
| As mentioned above this is a common problem with the Sako 85's and Beretta won't do a thing to help. They should simply admit to the design flaw and redesign the action to eliminate the problem Instead, they continue to sell a defective product. I have a friend who bought one of these rifles in 7mm mag. He mounted a Leupold VX3 3.5x10x40 scope without turrets using Sako Optilock ringmounts. He had the same problem and got the stock answer from Beretta which was to try different rings and scope combinations. He sent the rifle down the road. My first rifle was a Sako Finnbear in .270 Win. which I still have. Great rifle but I would never buy one of the new Sako rifles.
Tom Z
NRA Life Member
|
| Posts: 2349 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: 07 January 2005 | ![Reply With Quote Reply With Quote](https://forums.accuratereloading.com/groupee_common/ver1.3.7.2147483647/platform_images/blank.gif)
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I found an interesting piece on the sako collectors Club site. A fellow found that the rim thickness contributed to the issue. Thicker case rims worked better, having a better fit in the extractor. To test the theory he used 308 brass in his 30-06 just to see how it ejected and found that spent cases went more horizontal. He then modified the extractor for a better fit and was able to solve his problem. |
| |
One of Us
![Picture of Clayman Picture of Clayman](https://forums.accuratereloading.com/evefiles/avatars/7/1/0/710102183/avatar.jpg)
| I know your pain! I had a thread here earlier in the summer about a newly acquired AV in 416 Remington with the same issue. Now, my gun is left handed, so it wasn't the windage turret cases were hitting, it was the dial for the illumination. I took slow motion video of me ejecting cases, and it became very clear what the issue was. I replaced the scope to a Vari-X III without anything on the left side of the gun, and it's been flawless since. If you read the Sako forums, you'll see a lengthy history of this issue with the M85. I've no idea why Sako placed the ejector where they did, but they did. I have a pack of the Gre Tan ejector springs, which are stronger and supposed to help change the angle slightly. I'd happily send you one or two of them for free if you wanted to give that a try. It's a simple swap to see. I didn't end up using them in my rifle because the issue wasn't related to that. One other fix I've seen was to have a gunsmith bevel the top corner of the extractor slightly. This is supposed to have a more pronounced change to the ejection angle. It's popular with other types of shooters, too.
_____________________________________________________ No safe queens!
|
| Posts: 1225 | Location: Gilbertsville, PA | Registered: 08 December 2005 | ![Reply With Quote Reply With Quote](https://forums.accuratereloading.com/groupee_common/ver1.3.7.2147483647/platform_images/blank.gif)
IP
|
|
One of Us
![Picture of 4sixteen Picture of 4sixteen](https://forums.accuratereloading.com/groupee_common/platform_images/avatars/set1/73.jpg)
| Probably because less production line re-tooling with ejector at 6 o'clock for both LH and RH models. Some long turret scopes can cause issues (got .300 WM Grey Wolf, .375 H&H Kodiak and .30-06 Bavarian Carbine 85's) otherwise ok. |
| |
One of Us
![Picture of Labman Picture of Labman](https://forums.accuratereloading.com/evefiles/avatars/1/2/4/124107371/avatar.jpg)
| quote: If you read the Sako forums, you'll see a lengthy history of this issue with the M85. I've no idea why Sako placed the ejector where they did, but they did. I have a pack of the Gre Tan ejector springs, which are stronger and supposed to help change the angle slightly. I'd happily send you one or two of them for free if you wanted to give that a try. It's a simple swap to see. I didn't end up using them in my rifle because the issue wasn't related to that.
Good suggestions but these are things the customer shouldn't have to do to make a new rifle function properly. Especially on a rifle costing over $1,000. Beretta should have made these rather simple changes to the rifles. That it was really sticks in my craw. Beretta knows they have a problem and won't fix it and continues to sell a defective product.
Tom Z
NRA Life Member
|
| Posts: 2349 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: 07 January 2005 | ![Reply With Quote Reply With Quote](https://forums.accuratereloading.com/groupee_common/ver1.3.7.2147483647/platform_images/blank.gif)
IP
|
|
One of Us
![Picture of Clayman Picture of Clayman](https://forums.accuratereloading.com/evefiles/avatars/7/1/0/710102183/avatar.jpg)
| quote: Originally posted by Labman: Good suggestions but these are things the customer shouldn't have to do to make a new rifle function properly. Especially on a rifle costing over $1,000.
Beretta should have made these rather simple changes to the rifles. That it was really sticks in my craw. Beretta knows they have a problem and won't fix it and continues to sell a defective product.
Agreed on all points, and I've been over this with some others. My particular issue wasn't a design flaw (AV model works fine) but rather a simple fact of something in the way of the ejection port. The M85's are a different story and one well-told across many users. The rifles are really nice, and honestly, if I liked it enough and a simple fix like a spring was all it took, I wouldn't think twice about remedying it. This kind of stuff happens on all rifles, though maybe not to this degree, but it's something worth investigating.
_____________________________________________________ No safe queens!
|
| Posts: 1225 | Location: Gilbertsville, PA | Registered: 08 December 2005 | ![Reply With Quote Reply With Quote](https://forums.accuratereloading.com/groupee_common/ver1.3.7.2147483647/platform_images/blank.gif)
IP
|
|