THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Page 1 2 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
All this recoil talk
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of Jarrod
posted
I personally don't get all this talk about recoil. Especially all the people who say a 270 kicks etc.
Maybe it is because I was turkey hunting with a 870, 12 gauge using 3 inch turkey loads before I was a teenager.

Over the years i've only shot about 3 or 4, 270's. Two Mod 700's and a Tang Saftey Mod 77 with red recoil pad. I've always heard all this talk about how hard kicking a 270 is and to get a 7mm-08 because they have less recoil bla bla bla. Personally I think a 270 in a normal weight rifle has very little recoil.
I never really liked a 270 which I guess was just more repeating things I had heard about the cartridge than actual experience with it and I guess helping when I was a kid helping track a deer that a friend had shot and we never found it till sometime later when there wasn't much left but bones. I realize that was more poor shot placement than the cartridge.
I would like to make it a point to personally hunt with a 270 so that maybe I can get rid of the bad taste in my mouth I have toward the cartridge

The first time I ever shot a 300 Win Mag I was probably 13 or 14 at the time. I was expecting a fast kick which the 300's do have but to me it just wasn't that bad.

I deer hunted a few times with a 338WM just because I wanted to hunt with it. The 338 has a little kick to it but I didn't think it was that bad either. No problem at all keep it under an inch at 100 yards. The deer I killed with it at about 150 yards I think was dead before it hit the ground. I assume it would be just as effective on an elk.

I've had a 7mag or two and I don't think they kick much. Had a Marlin Lever action in 45-70 didn't think it was that bad. Perosnally I think they are all pussycats compared to the percieved recoil of the 300 Ultra Mag I had but it was that sharp fast kind of recoil instead of a hard shove. But even it wasn't that bad. I wouldn't want to shoot 40 rounds a day through one just for the heck of it, but I would have no issues shooting it reguarly enough to stay proficent with one.

I know that 338WM in a light rifle will probably knock the snot out of you and im sure a 270 in a very light rifle or one that doesn't fit you well etc will have some recoil to it. I know if you have a bad shoulder you probably wouldnt want to shoot a light 338wm regularly either.
For the likes of me I don't see how a healthy grown man that has shooting experience would think a 270 or 7mag in a normal weight rifle has a lot of recoil?


"Science only goes so far then God takes over."
 
Posts: 3504 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cobra
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jarrod:
I personally don't get all this talk about recoil. Especially all the people who say a 270 kicks etc.
Maybe it is because I was turkey hunting with a 870, 12 gauge using 3 inch turkey loads before I was a teenager.

Over the years i've only shot about 3 or 4, 270's. Two Mod 700's and a Tang Saftey Mod 77 with red recoil pad. I've always heard all this talk about how hard kicking a 270 is and to get a 7mm-08 because they have less recoil bla bla bla. Personally I think a 270 in a normal weight rifle has very little recoil.
I never really liked a 270 which I guess was just more repeating things I had heard about the cartridge than actual experience with it and I guess helping when I was a kid helping track a deer that a friend had shot and we never found it till sometime later when there wasn't much left but bones. I realize that was more poor shot placement than the cartridge.
I would like to make it a point to personally hunt with a 270 so that maybe I can get rid of the bad taste in my mouth I have toward the cartridge

The first time I ever shot a 300 Win Mag I was probably 13 or 14 at the time. I was expecting a fast kick which the 300's do have but to me it just wasn't that bad.

I deer hunted a few times with a 338WM just because I wanted to hunt with it. The 338 has a little kick to it but I didn't think it was that bad either. No problem at all keep it under an inch at 100 yards. The deer I killed with it at about 150 yards I think was dead before it hit the ground. I assume it would be just as effective on an elk.

I've had a 7mag or two and I don't think they kick much. Had a Marlin Lever action in 45-70 didn't think it was that bad. Perosnally I think they are all pussycats compared to the percieved recoil of the 300 Ultra Mag I had but it was that sharp fast kind of recoil instead of a hard shove. But even it wasn't that bad. I wouldn't want to shoot 40 rounds a day through one just for the heck of it, but I would have no issues shooting it reguarly enough to stay proficent with one.

I know that 338WM in a light rifle will probably knock the snot out of you and im sure a 270 in a very light rifle or one that doesn't fit you well etc will have some recoil to it. I know if you have a bad shoulder you probably wouldnt want to shoot a light 338wm regularly either.
For the likes of me I don't see how a healthy grown man that has shooting experience would think a 270 or 7mag in a normal weight rifle has a lot of recoil?


You just answered your own question, a lot of shooters don't have your experience. Some are restricted by work commitments, money or any number of reasons. Shooting isn't supposed to be a macho sport to see who can stand the most recoil. Roll Eyes


 
Posts: 8827 | Location: CANADA | Registered: 25 August 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Recoil is subjective. What hurts one person might not bother another. Perceived recoil also has a lot to do with the design of the rifle's stock and how it fits the shooter. I think a lot of people who think their rifle kicks too hard are really suffering from a poorly designed and/or ill-fitting stock, especially if they're complaining about a normal, non-magnum medium bore rifle.
 
Posts: 641 | Location: SW Pennsylvania, USA | Registered: 10 October 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Jarrod, I also had the mind set of not really having thing against the 270win but not really liking them either, then I bought one and the rifle was a POS. I found the cartridge intriguing enough that I later bought another rifle in 270 and sold it because I wanted a better one, so I bought a Savage 111 with Boyd's laminated stock and Timney trigger. Even now I find myself wanting to custom barrel an old tang safety Ruger M77 to 270win. So far with the Savage in 270 that I have now I have shot three deer and a coyote and they never moved after the shot. The yote was running at about 350 yds and the bullet went through both shoulders but he required another shot to finish him. You should try one for yourself and I think you will find it very suitable for most medium game. BTW, I don't think the 270 kicks much either.


Dennis
Life member NRA
 
Posts: 1191 | Location: Ft. Morgan, CO | Registered: 15 April 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of wildcat junkie
posted Hide Post
Stock geometry (not talking recoil pads here) has more to do W/perceived recoil than the actual free recoil.

A poorly designed stock will beat up the face while a properly designed stock directs recoil away from the face & reduces muzzle rise.


GOOGLE HOTLINK FIX FOR BLOCKED PHOTOBUCKET IMAGES https://chrome.google.com/webs...inkfix=1516144253810
 
Posts: 2440 | Location: Northern New York, WAY NORTH | Registered: 04 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jarrod
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cobra:
quote:
Originally posted by Jarrod:
I personally don't get all this talk about recoil. Especially all the people who say a 270 kicks etc.
Maybe it is because I was turkey hunting with a 870, 12 gauge using 3 inch turkey loads before I was a teenager.

Over the years i've only shot about 3 or 4, 270's. Two Mod 700's and a Tang Saftey Mod 77 with red recoil pad. I've always heard all this talk about how hard kicking a 270 is and to get a 7mm-08 because they have less recoil bla bla bla. Personally I think a 270 in a normal weight rifle has very little recoil.
I never really liked a 270 which I guess was just more repeating things I had heard about the cartridge than actual experience with it and I guess helping when I was a kid helping track a deer that a friend had shot and we never found it till sometime later when there wasn't much left but bones. I realize that was more poor shot placement than the cartridge.
I would like to make it a point to personally hunt with a 270 so that maybe I can get rid of the bad taste in my mouth I have toward the cartridge

The first time I ever shot a 300 Win Mag I was probably 13 or 14 at the time. I was expecting a fast kick which the 300's do have but to me it just wasn't that bad.

I deer hunted a few times with a 338WM just because I wanted to hunt with it. The 338 has a little kick to it but I didn't think it was that bad either. No problem at all keep it under an inch at 100 yards. The deer I killed with it at about 150 yards I think was dead before it hit the ground. I assume it would be just as effective on an elk.

I've had a 7mag or two and I don't think they kick much. Had a Marlin Lever action in 45-70 didn't think it was that bad. Perosnally I think they are all pussycats compared to the percieved recoil of the 300 Ultra Mag I had but it was that sharp fast kind of recoil instead of a hard shove. But even it wasn't that bad. I wouldn't want to shoot 40 rounds a day through one just for the heck of it, but I would have no issues shooting it reguarly enough to stay proficent with one.

I know that 338WM in a light rifle will probably knock the snot out of you and im sure a 270 in a very light rifle or one that doesn't fit you well etc will have some recoil to it. I know if you have a bad shoulder you probably wouldnt want to shoot a light 338wm regularly either.
For the likes of me I don't see how a healthy grown man that has shooting experience would think a 270 or 7mag in a normal weight rifle has a lot of recoil?


You just answered your own question, a lot of shooters don't have your experience. Some are restricted by work commitments, money or any number of reasons. Shooting isn't supposed to be a macho sport to see who can stand the most recoil. Roll Eyes



Ive either been or the military or worked blue collar jobs my entire working life so no money here. I have shot more rifles that didnt belong to me than did belong to me. Although being a working person my shooting has been restricted to mostly weekends. Sometimes I shoot reguarly on weeekends then times I may go a couple months without shooting anything.

I agree with you that shooting is not a macho sport. Maybe the reason I don't think 300 and 338 mags kick that hard is because of shooting 3 inch magnum turkey loads as a kid. I don't expect everyone to feel the same way about the recoil of those particular cartridges. However even if someone is an occasional shooter I just feel that the average 270 or any cartridge that has similar recoil is just not that macho to learn how to shoot effectively.


"Science only goes so far then God takes over."
 
Posts: 3504 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jarrod
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Luckyducker:
Jarrod, I also had the mind set of not really having thing against the 270win but not really liking them either, then I bought one and the rifle was a POS. I found the cartridge intriguing enough that I later bought another rifle in 270 and sold it because I wanted a better one, so I bought a Savage 111 with Boyd's laminated stock and Timney trigger. Even now I find myself wanting to custom barrel an old tang safety Ruger M77 to 270win. So far with the Savage in 270 that I have now I have shot three deer and a coyote and they never moved after the shot. The yote was running at about 350 yds and the bullet went through both shoulders but he required another shot to finish him. You should try one for yourself and I think you will find it very suitable for most medium game. BTW, I don't think the 270 kicks much either.

You see an experience like yours is the problem here. If I personally hunt with one I might end up eating crow after all these years of cussing 270s Smiler


"Science only goes so far then God takes over."
 
Posts: 3504 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
Roll EyesOK oldroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jarrod
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bartsche:
Roll EyesOK oldroger

Not sure what you mean by this post exactly. but my last post was kind of a joke.


"Science only goes so far then God takes over."
 
Posts: 3504 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jarrod
posted Hide Post
Let me get something straight. I think a 270, 7x57, 308, 30-06 etc will kill the biggest bull elk on the mountain.
I did fall into magnum mania for a while but now that im a little wiser don't see the need for them. But I think the recoil of a lot of them is blown way out of porportion


"Science only goes so far then God takes over."
 
Posts: 3504 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Fjold
posted Hide Post
Slight thread jack here but I just realized that I'm 54 years old and I've never shot a 270 Win.

I have a couple of dozen long guns in the safe right now and I don't have a single gun that is chambered in a long action cartridge, that is not a magnum. As a matter of fact, I've only owned one long action, non-magnum rifle in my life and that was a Garand.

That's weird.


Frank



"I don't know what there is about buffalo that frightens me so.....He looks like he hates you personally. He looks like you owe him money."
- Robert Ruark, Horn of the Hunter, 1953

NRA Life, SAF Life, CRPA Life, DRSS lite

 
Posts: 12821 | Location: Kentucky, USA | Registered: 30 December 2002Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Never considered recoil an issue with the .270 thru the 338 win mag. Just shot a 375 H and H from the bench the other day. Well, that did get my attention. I did not hold on to the forearm either. Next time I think I will. The 375 hits like a bubba.
 
Posts: 23 | Location: Western Wa. | Registered: 20 September 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I personally think the recoil is nothing on a 270. I do, however, have an odd observation about my 270's. They will put a mark on my shoulder before my 416 Remington Magnum does. The 416 clearly kicks more. I have never understood that.
 
Posts: 12158 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: 26 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Todd Williams
posted Hide Post
Stock design and fit are certainly important to perceived recoil. But I have a bit of a different attitude that goes along with what Jarrod is saying.

I shoot a lot of very large bore rifles. I'm currently shooting a 577NE about 10 rounds or so every week while getting ready for safari. The gun is new to me as I've been using a 500NE. When I first shot it about 6 weeks ago, I thought it was significantly heavier in recoil than the 500NE. Now, I'm not so sure.

I'm firmly convinced that exposure to recoil with the proper mindset determines a person's recoil tolerance. I'm not talking about a macho attitude at all. What I'm speaking of is this, if you head out to the range with the idea firmly planted in your mind that the rifle is going to kick like hell, that is certainly the way you're going to perceive it!

I try to set it in my mind that the gun is going to kick whether I squeeze the trigger or jerk it. Doesn't matter. It's going to kick the same so I might as well go through the motions correctly. Squeeze don't jerk. Tell yourself that the gun really doesn't kick that bad and pretty soon, you'll realize that it really doesn't.

Convince yourself mentally that a 270 Win is going to punish you and it will. Convince yourself that a 577NE isn't going to punish you and it wont. Simply a matter of exposure with the right mindset.
 
Posts: 8537 | Registered: 09 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Crazyhorseconsulting
posted Hide Post
From my experience, stock design plays one of the biggest factors in felt/perceived recoil while the overallweight of the rifle plays another big part.

My .375 H&H does not bother me from the bench.

My .300 Weatherby and the .340 Weatherby I did have were/are not all that much fun off the bench.

I have had two .458's. The Ruger 77 I had was not pleasant, the CZ 550 with the luxe stock was fun and at times I wish I had not sold it.

My .35 Whelen Model 77 Ruger is a pleasant gun to shoot, but for many folks at about 8 pounds including scope and with a 26 inch barrel, that is a little more gun than many folks want to carry on a hunt.


Even the rocks don't last forever.



 
Posts: 31014 | Location: Olney, Texas | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Brad
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jarrod:
I personally don't get all this talk about recoil. Especially all the people who say a 270 kicks etc.
Maybe it is because I was turkey hunting with a 870, 12 gauge using 3 inch turkey loads before I was a teenager.

Over the years i've only shot about 3 or 4, 270's. Two Mod 700's and a Tang Saftey Mod 77 with red recoil pad. I've always heard all this talk about how hard kicking a 270 is and to get a 7mm-08 because they have less recoil bla bla bla. Personally I think a 270 in a normal weight rifle has very little recoil.
I never really liked a 270 which I guess was just more repeating things I had heard about the cartridge than actual experience with it and I guess helping when I was a kid helping track a deer that a friend had shot and we never found it till sometime later when there wasn't much left but bones. I realize that was more poor shot placement than the cartridge.
I would like to make it a point to personally hunt with a 270 so that maybe I can get rid of the bad taste in my mouth I have toward the cartridge

The first time I ever shot a 300 Win Mag I was probably 13 or 14 at the time. I was expecting a fast kick which the 300's do have but to me it just wasn't that bad.

I deer hunted a few times with a 338WM just because I wanted to hunt with it. The 338 has a little kick to it but I didn't think it was that bad either. No problem at all keep it under an inch at 100 yards. The deer I killed with it at about 150 yards I think was dead before it hit the ground. I assume it would be just as effective on an elk.

I've had a 7mag or two and I don't think they kick much. Had a Marlin Lever action in 45-70 didn't think it was that bad. Perosnally I think they are all pussycats compared to the percieved recoil of the 300 Ultra Mag I had but it was that sharp fast kind of recoil instead of a hard shove. But even it wasn't that bad. I wouldn't want to shoot 40 rounds a day through one just for the heck of it, but I would have no issues shooting it reguarly enough to stay proficent with one.

I know that 338WM in a light rifle will probably knock the snot out of you and im sure a 270 in a very light rifle or one that doesn't fit you well etc will have some recoil to it. I know if you have a bad shoulder you probably wouldnt want to shoot a light 338wm regularly either.
For the likes of me I don't see how a healthy grown man that has shooting experience would think a 270 or 7mag in a normal weight rifle has a lot of recoil?


How old are you?
 
Posts: 3526 | Registered: 27 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Perceived recoil is different for all of us that shoot. My editor has a muzzle brake on a .300 Win mag and refuses to shoot my .416 or anything bigger than a .375. Some people are impervious to recoil and it bothers others horribly. My personal limit is what I can shoot off the bench. Either the .458 Lott or the .470 Nitro. Off of sticks, they are pussycats but I handload and I need a more stable platform to work up loads to shoot. 40 rounds off the bench WITHOUT a lead sled is all I can do out of a Lott. So I guess that is my limit.
 
Posts: 4214 | Location: Southern Colorado | Registered: 09 October 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Similar to Larry Shores, had a little XTR Featherweight in .270. Really accurate little gun, had a little bite to it. I,ve got a slightly light 9.3x62, can shoot it all day long, clearly feel a lot more recoil from it than the .270. But the .270 is the only gun thus far to leave me with a bruise on my shoulder. May be an odd observation, but I suppose in line with the faster recoil pulse of a lighter, faster bullet. In the 9.3, find that I like shooting 286s better than 250s. Notice I,d rather deal with the push of a .44 than the snap of a .357...
 
Posts: 806 | Location: Ketchikan, Alaska | Registered: 24 April 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
I'm firmly convinced that exposure to recoil with the proper mindset determines a person's recoil tolerance. I'm not talking about a macho attitude at all. What I'm speaking of is this, if you head out to the range with the idea firmly planted in your mind that the rifle is going to kick like hell, that is certainly the way you're going to perceive it!

I try to set it in my mind that the gun is going to kick whether I squeeze the trigger or jerk it. Doesn't matter. It's going to kick the same so I might as well go through the motions correctly. Squeeze don't jerk. Tell yourself that the gun really doesn't kick that bad and pretty soon, you'll realize that it really doesn't.

Convince yourself mentally that a 270 Win is going to punish you and it will. Convince yourself that a 577NE isn't going to punish you and it wont. Simply a matter of exposure with the right mindset.


+10!!

I started shooting my Dad's 300Wby when I was 12 and thought it was a monster, and it was to me. After I bought a 375 I came to the same conclusion as Todd, that it is all in your mind and that the gun is going to recoil whether you do your job or flinch like heck, so you may as well do it right and either hit what you're aiming at or not take the shot.

I hate recoil too, but I also like big guns. I've shot hundreds and hundreds of rounds through my 4-bore over the last eight years, most with black powder (significantly more recoil for the same velocity than smokeless) and think it is a matter of practice and gun fit. Some days I tell myself I want to make 3 shots as perfectly as I can make them and take 5-10 minutes between, some days I shoot 25-30, and other days I quit after one. I also definitely feel it if I get out of practice, which reinforces my belief that it is simply a matter of what someone is acustomed to. After just a short while of this I'd shoot my 375 prone all day long, while my father is still firmly convinced a 35W is a scope destroying beast!

On the same note, I recall a Ross Seyfried article in Guns&Ammo from the early 80s on recoil in which he showed a series of photos of Ray Meyer (then ~70) getting blasted back off of the bench onto a spotter while regulating a 4-bore double. The upshot of his story was that if Ray could do this as a retirement hobby, with practice and the right technique you should be able to shoot that 300 without a flinch.

Or to paraphrase what Ray A. once said on this site, the best way to get used to the recoil of your 9lb 375 is to go out and shoot a 9lb 500J, then switch back and it will feel like a 22.

Just my 2 cents.


DRSS

"If we're not supposed to eat animals, why are they made out of meat?"

"PS. To add a bit of Pappasonian philosophy: this single barrel stuff is just a passing fad. Bolt actions and single shots will fade away as did disco, the hula hoop, and bell-bottomed pants. Doubles will rule the world!"
 
Posts: 816 | Location: MT | Registered: 14 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
You spend a summer shooting 22LRs, .223s and such, in the fall when you first pick up say a 30-06, it kicks. I don't care how macho you perceive yourself. Has experience prepared you for it? Perhaps and you work past it. But whether you are shooting something in the '06 bracket or something larger, it takes some getting used to and it takes frequent exposure to stay used to it. I routinely shoot one or two of the belted cartridges a couple of times a week. Shooting a boomer from the bench is a totally different set up than shooting a .222.
Someone that puts old trusty-rusty in the closet until next hunting season is gonna be in trouble and he's the one likely to screw up the shot since as best he remembers, the thing kicks like a team of mules.


Aim for the exit hole
 
Posts: 4348 | Location: middle tenn | Registered: 09 December 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Blacktailer
posted Hide Post
I am also in the "stock fit" crowd. FWIW here is my experience. Used to have a M70 in -06. Weighed about 9 1/2 lbs, it didn't kick bad given the weight. Traded it for a M700 in -06 and had a smith whittle it down to 7 lbs with a custom kevlar stock that was fitted to me. Guess what? The perceived recoil is far less.
The idea that your perception follows your anticipation also has merit. After shooting my 375 H&H regularly my other rifles including a 300RUM don't kick much at all. YMMV


Have gun- Will travel
The value of a trophy is computed directly in terms of personal investment in its acquisition. Robert Ruark
 
Posts: 3831 | Location: Cave Creek, AZ | Registered: 09 August 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Dr. Lou
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jarrod:
I personally don't get all this talk about recoil. Especially all the people who say a 270 kicks etc.
Maybe it is because I was turkey hunting with a 870, 12 gauge using 3 inch turkey loads before I was a teenager.

Over the years i've only shot about 3 or 4, 270's. Two Mod 700's and a Tang Saftey Mod 77 with red recoil pad. I've always heard all this talk about how hard kicking a 270 is and to get a 7mm-08 because they have less recoil bla bla bla. Personally I think a 270 in a normal weight rifle has very little recoil.
I never really liked a 270 which I guess was just more repeating things I had heard about the cartridge than actual experience with it and I guess helping when I was a kid helping track a deer that a friend had shot and we never found it till sometime later when there wasn't much left but bones. I realize that was more poor shot placement than the cartridge.
I would like to make it a point to personally hunt with a 270 so that maybe I can get rid of the bad taste in my mouth I have toward the cartridge

The first time I ever shot a 300 Win Mag I was probably 13 or 14 at the time. I was expecting a fast kick which the 300's do have but to me it just wasn't that bad.

I deer hunted a few times with a 338WM just because I wanted to hunt with it. The 338 has a little kick to it but I didn't think it was that bad either. No problem at all keep it under an inch at 100 yards. The deer I killed with it at about 150 yards I think was dead before it hit the ground. I assume it would be just as effective on an elk.

I've had a 7mag or two and I don't think they kick much. Had a Marlin Lever action in 45-70 didn't think it was that bad. Perosnally I think they are all pussycats compared to the percieved recoil of the 300 Ultra Mag I had but it was that sharp fast kind of recoil instead of a hard shove. But even it wasn't that bad. I wouldn't want to shoot 40 rounds a day through one just for the heck of it, but I would have no issues shooting it reguarly enough to stay proficent with one.

I know that 338WM in a light rifle will probably knock the snot out of you and im sure a 270 in a very light rifle or one that doesn't fit you well etc will have some recoil to it. I know if you have a bad shoulder you probably wouldnt want to shoot a light 338wm regularly either.
For the likes of me I don't see how a healthy grown man that has shooting experience would think a 270 or 7mag in a normal weight rifle has a lot of recoil?


I don't know who you're talking to or hanging out with, but they must be a bunch of whimps or 4th graders. Big Grin


****************
NRA Life Benefactor Member
 
Posts: 3316 | Location: USA | Registered: 15 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jarrod
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dr. Lou:
quote:
Originally posted by Jarrod:
I personally don't get all this talk about recoil. Especially all the people who say a 270 kicks etc.
Maybe it is because I was turkey hunting with a 870, 12 gauge using 3 inch turkey loads before I was a teenager.

Over the years i've only shot about 3 or 4, 270's. Two Mod 700's and a Tang Saftey Mod 77 with red recoil pad. I've always heard all this talk about how hard kicking a 270 is and to get a 7mm-08 because they have less recoil bla bla bla. Personally I think a 270 in a normal weight rifle has very little recoil.
I never really liked a 270 which I guess was just more repeating things I had heard about the cartridge than actual experience with it and I guess helping when I was a kid helping track a deer that a friend had shot and we never found it till sometime later when there wasn't much left but bones. I realize that was more poor shot placement than the cartridge.
I would like to make it a point to personally hunt with a 270 so that maybe I can get rid of the bad taste in my mouth I have toward the cartridge

The first time I ever shot a 300 Win Mag I was probably 13 or 14 at the time. I was expecting a fast kick which the 300's do have but to me it just wasn't that bad.

I deer hunted a few times with a 338WM just because I wanted to hunt with it. The 338 has a little kick to it but I didn't think it was that bad either. No problem at all keep it under an inch at 100 yards. The deer I killed with it at about 150 yards I think was dead before it hit the ground. I assume it would be just as effective on an elk.

I've had a 7mag or two and I don't think they kick much. Had a Marlin Lever action in 45-70 didn't think it was that bad. Perosnally I think they are all pussycats compared to the percieved recoil of the 300 Ultra Mag I had but it was that sharp fast kind of recoil instead of a hard shove. But even it wasn't that bad. I wouldn't want to shoot 40 rounds a day through one just for the heck of it, but I would have no issues shooting it reguarly enough to stay proficent with one.

I know that 338WM in a light rifle will probably knock the snot out of you and im sure a 270 in a very light rifle or one that doesn't fit you well etc will have some recoil to it. I know if you have a bad shoulder you probably wouldnt want to shoot a light 338wm regularly either.
For the likes of me I don't see how a healthy grown man that has shooting experience would think a 270 or 7mag in a normal weight rifle has a lot of recoil?


I don't know who you're talking to or hanging out with, but they must be a bunch of whimps or 4th graders. Big Grin


Most of this talk about 270's kicking etc has come from this here forum over the last few years and maybe a little over on 24 hour campfire. dancing


"Science only goes so far then God takes over."
 
Posts: 3504 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jpat
posted Hide Post
OK I have an F series Savage 110 7MM Rem Mag, My buddy has the same rifle in .270. Felt recoil is much sharper in the .270. Makes no sense. But I can shoot the 7mm Mag all day, his rifle w/ factory 150gr loads is abusive. What powder is used in the .270 150gr?? No idea, but it has to be pretty fast burning to recoil the way it does.
 
Posts: 447 | Location: NH | Registered: 09 May 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Have to disagree with most here on the perceived recoil of a .270 Win... It's a pussycat! Cool

On the other mitt, I wholly agree with the bunch that say (something like this): "Shoot a true Big Bore for fun and games on a semi-regular basis and even your 300 Win Mag will seem like a .223 Rem to those who shoot more than a dozen rounds annually from their hard-kickin' .270!" Big Grin

And yeah, recoil pads, stock shape and fit, weight all up, bullet weight, amount and type of powder burned, recoil velocity, etc, etc, etc, all play a role... but NOTHING beats lots of practice.

I knew a gun smith who once told me that when he tests a rifle, whether a .222 Rem or .460 WBY, he rarely ever thinks about the cartridge... he's done so much of it, including in the military, that they all seem "normal" to him. coffee

Bob

www.bigbores.ca


"Let every created thing give praise to the LORD, for he issued his command, and they came into being" - King David, Psalm 148 (NLT)

 
Posts: 849 | Location: Kawartha Lakes, ONT, Canada | Registered: 21 November 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If I never had to sight in a new scope/rifle or work up new loads, I wouldn't give recoil much thought. I never notice, or even give recoil a second thought when I'm hunting. Shooting off the bench, my Browning X-Bolt 300 Win Mag knocks the p!$$ out of me. Without a Past Pad (yeah, I'm a woosy), 10 or 12 rounds is about all I care to shoot. But, I can shoot my Ruger 358 Win and CZ 550 American 9.3x62 for hours off the bench without a problem. Stock design, recoil pad and caliber all play all have a role in perceived/felt recoil off the bench but, not so much when hunting.


Start young, hunt hard, and enjoy God's bounty.
 
Posts: 383 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: 24 December 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
So...was this a post just to prove how macho and manly you are? I mean, really, what was the point? Recoil, pain, taste, smell, art, music...its all relative to each individual. Why do some like coffee damn near boiling hot and others need a few ice cubes to drink it? Why do some like the bite and dryness of a heavy red wine while others stick to sweet whites? Why do some call for the hottest of hot sauce on everything they eat while others get heartburn just looking at black pepper? Its individual perception.


If you think every possible niche has been filled already, thank a wildcatter!
 
Posts: 2287 | Location: CO | Registered: 14 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 416Tanzan
posted Hide Post
Well, for a different perspective--

I need to get a 416 Rigby ready for my wife to shoot. She weighs about 115lb.

We don't have a smaller rifle in Africa anymore. She has occasionaly shot a 338WinMag without a problem, though she has a 270 in the US, so I suspect that she will handle the 416Rigby fine. The extra weight of the rifle may or may not affect her handling and hold. A CZ with hogback stock.

However, just to help with keeping those eyebrows clean I plan to load some special rounds of 350 grain down at about 2350-2400 fps. (96 grains of AA 3100, where 106gn does 2650fps.) So the rifle will be very much like a heavy-load 338. We should see how this works in a couple of weeks.


+-+-+-+-+-+-+

"A well-rounded hunting battery might include:
500 AccRel Nyati, 416 Rigby or 416 Ruger, 375Ruger or 338WM, 308 or 270, 243, 223" --
Conserving creation, hunting the harvest.
 
Posts: 4253 | Registered: 10 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of chuck375
posted Hide Post
Everyone is recoil sensitive, some more than others, usually it just takes time, practice and a desire to become comfortable with it. I started out with a 243 and kept it as my only big game rifle (for deer, javelina, elk and black bear) until my mid-twenties. Jumped up to a 270 and I was ready for anything! Had a Declerator Pad put on to dampen the recoil (my 243 had a plastic butt plate).

A lot of AR members are recoil sponges, but if they tell you what they started out with as young men / women it will tell you a tale of gradual progression.


Regards,

Chuck



"There's a saying in prize fighting, everyone's got a plan until they get hit"

Michael Douglas "The Ghost And The Darkness"
 
Posts: 4805 | Location: Colorado Springs | Registered: 01 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I started out at age 9 with a 30-06. My son is almost 13 and has a crippling paranoia to shoot anything over a 243. Damn kids nowadays.
 
Posts: 402 | Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado  | Registered: 15 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MileHighShooter:
So...was this a post just to prove how macho and manly you are? I mean, really, what was the point? Recoil, pain, taste, smell, art, music...its all relative to each individual. Why do some like coffee damn near boiling hot and others need a few ice cubes to drink it? Why do some like the bite and dryness of a heavy red wine while others stick to sweet whites? Why do some call for the hottest of hot sauce on everything they eat while others get heartburn just looking at black pepper? Its individual perception.

I was wondering that myself. Next we'll put our fingers in a vise and see who can turn it in the most to prove how really tough we are. Roll Eyes


Aim for the exit hole
 
Posts: 4348 | Location: middle tenn | Registered: 09 December 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
popcornIn the field hunting there would be no problem. On the bench testing many loads in a day ( 60 to 100 rounds ),there is one hell of a difference in enjoyment between my 22 Jet and one of my .270s. When you're a slim light weight your body will move with the recoil. When you're close to 280# your body doesn't move very fast with the recoil ( Felt energy transfer over time ). homer
At 76 years old I much perfere the recoil from the smaller bores. old When I was boxing as a kid I remember I never liked to get hit much. beer roger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 416Tanzan
posted Hide Post
Bartsche, I hear you.

Lord willing, I will have some old age wisdom soon enough. I just built a 500 AccRel and wondered if I will still enjoy shooting it at 70. We'll see. I might learn to love the small bores for shooting practice with just a few good hunting rounds to keep things tight. Maybe I'll get a 243 one of these years.

416Rigby loaded hot at 2800fps 350gn for long range impala? Well, for now that's all we've got.


+-+-+-+-+-+-+

"A well-rounded hunting battery might include:
500 AccRel Nyati, 416 Rigby or 416 Ruger, 375Ruger or 338WM, 308 or 270, 243, 223" --
Conserving creation, hunting the harvest.
 
Posts: 4253 | Registered: 10 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jarrod
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MileHighShooter:
So...was this a post just to prove how macho and manly you are? I mean, really, what was the point? Recoil, pain, taste, smell, art, music...its all relative to each individual. Why do some like coffee damn near boiling hot and others need a few ice cubes to drink it? Why do some like the bite and dryness of a heavy red wine while others stick to sweet whites? Why do some call for the hottest of hot sauce on everything they eat while others get heartburn just looking at black pepper? Its individual perception.


My original post had nothing to do with being macho or any of that. That is exactly the opposite of my point.
I guess in a nustshell a lot of people think a rifle kicks more than it actually does rather its because they don't wear earplugs and they flinch from the muzzle blast, or they are afraid the scope is going to hit them, or they have always been told that those dang ole 270's or 30-06's, or 7Mags or whatever will knock the snot out of ya. So they shoot one and automatically flinch because they are expecting to get whacked when they squeeze the trigger.
But it had nothing to do with being macho.


"Science only goes so far then God takes over."
 
Posts: 3504 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I must confess that, of all the rifles I have ever owned, the Sako in 338 Win Mag was the worst in terms of recoil. I sold it!
Peter.


Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright, that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless and do no wrong;
 
Posts: 10515 | Location: Jacksonville, Florida | Registered: 09 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BigNate
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dr. Lou:
I don't know who you're talking to or hanging out with, but they must be a bunch of whimps or 4th graders. Big Grin


LOL! My first thought was "you need a new circle of friends"!


P.S. I have a Model 600 in .308 that nobody at my house likes to shoot. I was truly surprised at it's recoil with 150's I had loaded for my wife.
I now shoot 180gr RN out of it, but I've lost my .257Roberts to my wife. My .338WM with 250's is nicer to shoot though.
 
Posts: 2376 | Location: Idaho Panhandle | Registered: 27 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BigNate:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Dr. Lou:


P.S. I have a Model 600 in .308 that nobody at my house likes to shoot. I was truly surprised at it's recoil with 150's I had loaded for my wife.

stir My Mod. 600 .308 became a .375 x 41 and on the bench it still smarts beerroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Brad
posted Hide Post
quote:


My original post had nothing to do with being macho or any of that. That is exactly the opposite of my point.
I guess in a nustshell a lot of people think a rifle kicks more than it actually does rather its because they don't wear earplugs and they flinch from the muzzle blast, or they are afraid the scope is going to hit them, or they have always been told that those dang ole 270's or 30-06's, or 7Mags or whatever will knock the snot out of ya. So they shoot one and automatically flinch because they are expecting to get whacked when they squeeze the trigger.
But it had nothing to do with being macho.


How old are you?
 
Posts: 3526 | Registered: 27 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Stock fit has a lot to do with perceived recoil.
I had a Savage 110 in 30-06 that came from the factory with one of the economy white wood stocks. I hated the appearance but what do you get on a $55 30-06? At a gun show about 40 years ago I ran into a Savage 110 Premier grade stock. This was a skip line French walnut with the roll over comb etc etc. That rifle was terrible with the fancy stock. At the same time I had another bargain rifle - a Firearms International Musketeer FN Mauser in .308 Norma magnum. It was really mild shooting compared to the Savage with the fancy stock.

Recoil is the basis of a lot of people shooting deer with .223/5.56 rifles. Many can not admit that they cannot take any recoil.
 
Posts: 13978 | Location: http://www.tarawaontheweb.org/tarawa2.jpg | Registered: 03 December 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jarrod
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Brad:
quote:


My original post had nothing to do with being macho or any of that. That is exactly the opposite of my point.
I guess in a nustshell a lot of people think a rifle kicks more than it actually does rather its because they don't wear earplugs and they flinch from the muzzle blast, or they are afraid the scope is going to hit them, or they have always been told that those dang ole 270's or 30-06's, or 7Mags or whatever will knock the snot out of ya. So they shoot one and automatically flinch because they are expecting to get whacked when they squeeze the trigger.
But it had nothing to do with being macho.


How old are you?


33


"Science only goes so far then God takes over."
 
Posts: 3504 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia