THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
280 Accuracy
 Login/Join
 
<9.3x62>
posted
I've had a number of 280s over the years and they've all shot OK, but never great. What have other people's experiences been?
 
Reply With Quote
<Pygmy>
posted
My pet .280 is the same way...I get adequate hunting accuracy , appx. 1.5 " groups at 100 yards, but nothing to brag about...It is also very load selective...I had to find just the right combo to get groups as good as I get..

However the only times I failed to kill any animal I shot at with it, it was because I screwed up, and they were not all short range shots, either...
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
reloads with H4831sc and Nosler 150gr partitions and also Hornady 139gr boattails are very accurate in my .280.
Normally 3 shots under an inch.
Great caliber!
There is probably a bullet out there your rifle will like better, but maybe if you have decided your load is the bullet you want to use for hunting the accuracy you are getting is good enough.
 
Posts: 162 | Location: Boise | Registered: 07 May 2003Reply With Quote
<Savage 99>
posted
The was a thread here saying that the 280 has a wrong leade design. A particular gunsmith said that he knows what the correct one is!

I looked in my book of cartridge designs and indeed the 280 is different, as I recall, than others such as the 30-06 for instance.

At one time the 280 was the top choice for custom rifles.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
My .280 is a custom job, but the worst load I have put through it was 2". It shoots just about everything into 1 1/2" & many groups have been half that. This is from a very thin 23"bbl. (total rifle wt. w/ 3-9comp. is 7 1/4#).
I like 160gr bullets o/ IMR7828 & 140-150gr bullets o/ IMR4831 or H4831.
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have the original version, the 7x64. It was made in 1946 and still shoots MOA with Norma factory 175 gr loads. The barrel is 23.5" with a mannlicher stock.
 
Posts: 2036 | Location: Roebling, NJ 08554 | Registered: 20 January 2002Reply With Quote
<bobcash>
posted
My pair of Remington 725's will break an inch on a good day but average in the 1.25" range for 3 shot groups....with bullets ranging from 139-154 grain.....IMR 4350 or RL19 work well for me...

I like the 280 Remington but have found the 270 to be easier to develop loads for......
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
my Winchester Featherweight is incredibly accurate with lots of different loads. I've never had another M70 FWT that was anywhere near as accurate....Jim

[ 07-24-2003, 06:22: Message edited by: olarmy ]
 
Posts: 1416 | Location: Texas | Registered: 02 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Broke in a Ruger 77 with a Hogue stock for a buddy. With handloads its ultra-accurate.
 
Posts: 326 | Location: Cheyenne area WY USA | Registered: 18 January 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
My old Rem 700 was mediocre until I had it rebarreled with a #3 taper Douglas barrel. It shoots most hunting bullets into 3/4" or a bit more.
My newer Weatherby Ultra Lt Wt in .280 Rem is VERY accurate, especially with ballisitic tips. I have shot several under 1" groups (3 shots) at 200 yds with the Wby.

I have zero complaints when it comes to the .280 Rem, one of my favorite calibers.

FN in MT
 
Posts: 950 | Location: Cascade, Montana USA | Registered: 11 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Andre Mertens
posted Hide Post
My 7x64 Sauer 202 shoots many hunting loads into < .7 MOA and its petload -upper left in the pic- goes .4 MOA. Considering the similarity between the 2 calibers, I would expect the same accuracy in a good rifle.
 -
 
Posts: 2420 | Location: Belgium | Registered: 25 August 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Mine shoots right around 1 MOA with any of Speer or Hornady spitzers between 139 gr. and 154. In fact I measured a bunch of groups early on and they averaged 0.99"! Some groups are significantly better, none are significantly worse.

Only bullet I've tried that it won't shoot for some reason is the 150-gr. Partition.
 
Posts: 1246 | Location: Northern Virginia, USA | Registered: 02 June 2001Reply With Quote
<JOHAN>
posted
quote:
Originally posted by KurtC:
I have the original version, the 7x64. It was made in 1946

Well, Kurt C you are just to good [Smile] . I bet your rifle is a real candy. I guess finding a 7X64 is scarace as hell. I got a Brno m-21 action that wil become a 7X64 [Big Grin] I have to agree the 7X64 is one heck of a round.

Mr Mertens, take away thoose target groups, people will soon question the result of the fine 7X64 if you show such pictures [Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin] . Is this the sauer doing it's best ?

/ JOHAN
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Johan,

I just stumbled upon a wartime 22F in 8x57JS. It was made in 1943 and has all the typical Brno markings in German instead of Czech. Very interesting rifle, as I did not know they produced any sporting rifles during the occupation.

I'll post pics and shooting results in a couple of weeks.
 
Posts: 2036 | Location: Roebling, NJ 08554 | Registered: 20 January 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I know three 280's that will shoot 1/2 inch groups. Two are factory and the other is a custom job. They are the only three I know.

Chuck
 
Posts: 2659 | Location: Southwestern Alberta | Registered: 08 March 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Andre Mertens
posted Hide Post
Johan,
Routine groups from the Sauer with different bullets and powders. The upper left in the above pic is the best group to date, though : 1,08 cm / .37 MOA. To make my point, here's the backing paper of the first shooting of my 202 when I started developing a load : 30 shots, 3 bullet weights, 6 powder charges... all in 2.6 MOA.
 -
 
Posts: 2420 | Location: Belgium | Registered: 25 August 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I would say the 280 is as accurate as any other cartridge. I have 4 of them. An early Ruger 77,a Rem 760,a custom 03 Springfield and a custom rifle built on a Tikka 65 action.The Ruger and the Tikka will both shoot 3 shot groups that touch at 100 yds with 139 Hornady's. The rem pump will group into an inch at 100 with 145 gr Speer's and the 03 groups in an 1 1/4 at 100 yds with the 145 or 160 ge Speer's.All shoot best with IMR 4831 or H 4831SC at near max loads. A riflw that shoots groups like this and pushs a 139 -145 gr bullet at close to 3100 fps makes a pretty decent deer rifle. Don't really know what else you can ask for in a hunting rifle.
 
Posts: 2443 | Location: manitoba canada | Registered: 01 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
i have 4 seni custon 280's-1 mauser, 1 m70, 1 mountain eagle and 1 m700ks.. they are not the best shooters in the world, the mauser is a full house custom but has .15" of free bore and i have never really got it to consistantly shoot better than 2" groups.. i need to get the builder th take a few threads off & rechamber it.. the mountain eagle is at kruger being rebarreled at the manufacturers cost, never would do better than 2", the ks will shoot 3/4" groups all day but has never been hunted, the m70 is in a borden rimrock stock and was assembled by a well known sc gunsmith ..it shoots 140 gr partations & 154 hornady flat bases in 1/2" it is my mule deer out west scope but has never had good luck in georgia, so it mostly sits in a corner..

bottom line is i think the 280 is not a cal i would fool around with because all winchester brass is plated and i have got a lot of bad brass from remington..i think the 30'06,270, 257, and 25'06 are easier to get to shoot well. in the field on deer there is really no difference in any of these cal's. and on elk i'd move up to the '06 or 300 wm.
 
Posts: 1125 | Location: near atlanta,ga,usa | Registered: 26 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
none of my 280's come close to the volecities you read about on the internet..
 
Posts: 1125 | Location: near atlanta,ga,usa | Registered: 26 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
After shooting 270's,280's and 30-06's ,I find the 280's just as accurate as the other two if not moreso.
 
Posts: 3104 | Location: alberta,canada | Registered: 28 January 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of boilerroom
posted Hide Post
I've been working on loads for my old man's 280 now for a couple of months. It's a out of the box A-bolt hunter. 139gr. Hornady flat bases are a 1" load. Some times better. 150gr. Btips-moly are 1/2" and some times under. I have to do my part of course.

No luck with 154gr. SST, 145gr. Speer HC.
 
Posts: 4326 | Location: Under the North Star! | Registered: 25 December 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia