THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    Will a Bell & Carlson stock help me?

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Will a Bell & Carlson stock help me?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of ted thorn
posted
I have a Ruger 77 stainless/laminate and it is a real shooter but it is heavy. Would switching to a synthetic stock save enough weight to notice?


________________________________________________
Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper
Proudly made in the USA
Acepting all forms of payment
 
Posts: 7361 | Location: South East Missouri | Registered: 23 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
A little, but not a lot. I am given to understand that laminates are the heaviest stocks, followed by synthetics, and lastly, plain (or even fancy) wood. Kudude
 
Posts: 1473 | Location: Tallahassee, Florida | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of bowhuntrrl
posted Hide Post
I had a Bell and Carlson Carbelite stock, it was much lighter than the wood stock. It also tightened up the groups by quite a bit vs the original rem 700 wood stock.


Elite Archery and High Country dealer.
 
Posts: 931 | Location: Somewhere....... | Registered: 07 October 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator

Picture of Mark
posted Hide Post
Yes it will save a bit of weight. Also, that dang canoe paddle has to be one of the hardest hitting stocks around to the shooter.

If you spend a bit more you can get lighter stocks, but B&C is a good place to start.

I am biased a little as a B&C stock saved a M70 for me, wouldn't shoot at all with the factory wood and it really closed it up. That happened about 17 years ago and I still grab that gun when I need to shoot something bigger.


for every hour in front of the computer you should have 3 hours outside
 
Posts: 7776 | Location: Between 2 rivers, Middle USA | Registered: 19 August 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ted thorn:
I have a Ruger 77 stainless/laminate and it is a real shooter but it is heavy. Would switching to a synthetic stock save enough weight to notice?


Try one of Jim Borden's RIMROCK synthetic stocks. You won't regret it!

http://rimrockstocks.com/
 
Posts: 1610 | Location: Shelby, Ohio | Registered: 03 November 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I just took off a Bell and Carlson from my Ruger in .35 Whelen and put on a Boyds Laminated stock. I had weighed the stock on a scale that they use at our local gun club to check the rifles before some matches. The Bell and Carlson came in around 3/8ths of a pound lighter.
 
Posts: 195 | Registered: 02 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ted thorn
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Don Slater:
quote:
Originally posted by ted thorn:
I have a Ruger 77 stainless/laminate and it is a real shooter but it is heavy. Would switching to a synthetic stock save enough weight to notice?


Try one of Jim Borden's RIMROCK synthetic stocks. You won't regret it!

How much do these cost?

http://rimrockstocks.com/


________________________________________________
Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper
Proudly made in the USA
Acepting all forms of payment
 
Posts: 7361 | Location: South East Missouri | Registered: 23 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ted thorn
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by lefty315:
I just took off a Bell and Carlson from my Ruger in .35 Whelen and put on a Boyds Laminated stock. I had weighed the stock on a scale that they use at our local gun club to check the rifles before some matches. The Bell and Carlson came in around 3/8ths of a pound lighter.


3/4 of a pound is HUGE. I cant wait to change it over. Anyone want to buy my old stock?


________________________________________________
Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper
Proudly made in the USA
Acepting all forms of payment
 
Posts: 7361 | Location: South East Missouri | Registered: 23 November 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
3/8ths of a pound not 3/4ths. It was almost 1/2 pound but not quite there.
 
Posts: 195 | Registered: 02 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ted thorn:
quote:
Originally posted by Don Slater:
quote:
Originally posted by ted thorn:
I have a Ruger 77 stainless/laminate and it is a real shooter but it is heavy. Would switching to a synthetic stock save enough weight to notice?


Try one of Jim Borden's RIMROCK synthetic stocks. You won't regret it!

How much do these cost?

http://rimrockstocks.com/




About $195.00 plus $20.00 shipping. If I
remember correctly I paid about $215.00 delivered.

Give Joan Borden a call, and if necessary she will connect you to Mike in the shop. E-mails
can be slow.

I have two with no regrets! One is a model 77.

AND, they weigh less than a Bell and Carlson!

Don
 
Posts: 1610 | Location: Shelby, Ohio | Registered: 03 November 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of prof242
posted Hide Post
I have High Tech stocks on two rifles. Each of these weigh only 21oz finished. I also have two Bell&Carlson stocks which weigh over 30oz. Wood stocks, unless from a particularly light piece of wood and slimmed down, weigh more than this. Decide how much weight you want to remove. In this case, less is more, i.e. less weight in stock = more money. Frowner


.395 Family Member
DRSS, po' boy member
Political correctness is nothing but liberal enforced censorship
 
Posts: 3490 | Location: Colorado Springs, CO | Registered: 04 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ted thorn
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by lefty315:
3/8ths of a pound not 3/4ths. It was almost 1/2 pound but not quite there.


My bad... I see now.


________________________________________________
Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper
Proudly made in the USA
Acepting all forms of payment
 
Posts: 7361 | Location: South East Missouri | Registered: 23 November 2005Reply With Quote
One Of Us
Picture of KWard
posted Hide Post
I recently put a Bell & Carlson carbelite on my 77 30-06, definitly lighter that the wood stock, feels better in the hands and the gun shoots much better groups. The gunsmith did do a little work fitting as I sat and watched, I may have figured it out on my own, but my gunslithis close and a good friend. I am really happy. Wink
 
Posts: 319 | Location: Arizona | Registered: 31 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
KWard, ain't it nice to have friends like that? You got to do all you can to support them and bring them business too!!


An old pilot, not a bold pilot, aka "the pig murdering fool"
 
Posts: 2901 | Registered: 14 October 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The B&C stock is fine but I would consider pillar bedding it.

I have seen the foam stuff compress and distort under heavy use. Be careful not to overtighten the screws.

The B&C is good value for the dollar. High quality "light" stocks are very expensive.

Jamie
 
Posts: 322 | Location: B.C. Canada | Registered: 31 March 2003Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    Will a Bell & Carlson stock help me?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia