Moderator
| Where in MS are you located? I'm in the Jackson area. |
| |
one of us
| That is a great choice. I have that exact gun. It is great. The 9.5" is a little long for easy carry. If you want to scope it stay with 2X. I put on a Bushnell 2x6 but is make the rig heavier.
Have Fun
Hcliff |
| Posts: 305 | Location: Green Bay, WI | Registered: 09 September 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I know a lot of guys who like the 7.5", but both the 7.5" and the 9.5" are hefty to carry around as a side arm. I have a 9.5" .480 Ruger with a 2x Nikon Monarch on top. Its not little, but points well, feels good, shoots good, and is still lighter than the 12ga pump I carried around before.
If you're going to use the revolver as your primary weapon, then I don't think the length argument is all that important. Pick the one that seems to point/feel best to you.
Jeff |
| Posts: 38 | Location: Madison | Registered: 26 September 2003 |
IP
|
|
Moderator
| I pack my 7 1/2" 480 about a month a year (camping, fishing, hunting, hicking), with a shoulder rig. I don't find it to be cumbersome, but I wouldn't want to have the barrel any longer, not the gun any heavier. I keep debating having it cut down to 5 or 6 inches, but it shoots so well the way it is, I don't want to loose the shootability. I like the way the 7 1/2" barrel balances, no problems with off hand shooting. |
| |
Moderator
| I can't speak of the longer barrel, but I feel that for me the 7.5 is the practical carry limit -- sizewise. That said, I have 2 SRHs, a .480 and a .454. I enjoy shooting both of them as they are both very accurate. The .480 is certainly more pleasant to shoot than the .454 as it pushes while the Casull kicks. The .454 is considerably louder as well. I've hunted with the .480 and while it is loud, it's tolerable without hearing protection. Not looking forward to shooting the .454 without hearing protection. Too bad you don't live in Florida as you could try out my SRHs. |
| |
one of us
| I think the performance potential with the .454 is a bit higher than the .480, but in the .454 you cannot use as large of bullets. But as someone already said, they are so close that I don't think the difference would be noticable in the field.
However, if recoil is your concern, you can shoot .45 long colts in your .454. I do in mine and they perform as well as the .454 loads. I do not think there is a reduced load for the .480.
If you handload, there is also a wider selection of brass and bullets for the .454, at lower prices than the .480. |
| Posts: 68 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 13 May 2003 |
IP
|
|
Moderator
| I see the 454's primary advantage is it's high velocity, and hence longer range potential. It is an honest 150-175 yd gun.
IMHO, the 480 is an ideal iron sighted sixgun round. It has lots of user friendly power, and shoots plenty flat for 75-100 yds, and makes a decent sized tunnel through game as well. |
| |
one of us
| I have read somewhere that the barrels of the 454 and 480 are almost impossible to remove for custom work due to metal problems? Is this true? And I've also read a rumor that this is caused by Ruger using a type of glue or something and with a little heat to melt the barrels can be removed by gunsmith? Thanks! |
| |
Moderator
| I don't know, so can't say one way or the other about barrel removal. I can say that I know of two .454 SRHs Mag-Na-Port has customized. Therefore, I know some work can be done. |
| |
Moderator
| Bob,
Moving to Tampa in three weeks, but my office is in Lakeland. Where are you located? Cannot wait to do some hog hunting next month!
Whitworth |
| |
one of us
| Finally got set up over at hunt101.com, heres a pic of my SRH. |
| Posts: 66 | Location: Arkansas | Registered: 08 February 2004 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| |
| Posts: 66 | Location: Arkansas | Registered: 08 February 2004 |
IP
|
|