Back about 1980 when I was involved with metallic silhouette ,M29s like mine had a habit of shaving bits of metal from the bullet.They redesigned the forcing cone and I had mine redone which solved the problem.
I realize the purpose of the "forcing cone" in a pistol barrel is to funnel a bullet down the barrel after it has jumped from the cylinder. But as I understand it, if the forcing cone is too large (however big is too large) then the pistol's accuracy goes to hell.
My question is, if you get a pistol with an oversize forcing cone, what can you do about it? Shoot oversized bullets? What does a guy do about this issue?
Posts: 19677 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: 23 May 2002
Several people have complained about cylinder throats in Ruger revolvers that were too small thus causing the forcing cone/bbl diameter to be too large for best accuracy. The solution was to open up the cylinder throats, and shoot cast bullets of proper fit to the bbl. One of the main advantages of the Freedom Arms revolvers is that they are built "right".
Posts: 16134 | Location: Texas | Registered: 06 April 2002
I don't think the forcing cone being on the tight side will create much havoc. Reason I say this is; that for experimental purposes only (don't try this at home) Jim Taylor and I put a .45 Colt cylinder in my .44 Ruger Bisley and fired five rounds into one tight group at 25 yards. Swaging the bullets down from .452" to .430" did not seem to adversely affect the accuracy.
By the same token, firing a .44 cylinder from a .45 Colt revolver gave us a group of about 2.5" at 25 yards. This is as good as some of the groups I've seen shot from a revolver having the proper cylinder installed.
Much of the improvements I've seen regarding forcing cones is to ream the throat to 11� to improve alignment when the bullet enters the barrel. Most, if not all, of the damage I've heard of with forcing cones has been on the Fredaom Arms revolvers and horribly overdriving bullets in the .454 Casull. This is the reason Freedom Arms offers the forcing cone replacement option on the .454 chambered revolvers.
I have seen Ruger Super Blackhawks that would not shoot accurately enough for silhouette competition until cast bullets sized to .432" were used. The revolvers would shoot sccurately enough for plinking and most likley "minute of deer" out to 100 yards, but not to the level needed.
The forcing cone is meant to direct a misaligned bullet into the rifling. I think Ruger uses an 18* forcing cone. The old colts had virtually no forcing cone to speak of.
Forcing cones do not come in sizes but are measured in terms of degree. Forcing cones and throats are different things and should no be confused with each other.
I seriously doubt a forcing cone with to great of a degree would cause any measurable difference in accuracy. Proper alignment with cylinder and barrel, throat size, tight spots in the bore, and ammunition (including bullet size) would all play a much bigger part in accuracy or lack thereof.
MS Hitman, That is some pretty cool results with the 45 cylinder in the 44. How hard of an alloy were yall using? Pure lead or non-hardened WW?
David
Posts: 355 | Location: Baton Rouge, LA | Registered: 07 August 2003
I suppose that if your forcing cone was too long it could lead to excessive gas blow-by and cause leading in your barrel which would decrease your accuracy. If that is the problem using a bullet that is oversize might help, but might not "cure" the problem all together. You could still have lower than optimal velocities due to gas escaping and the gas blow-by may only be reduced, not eliminated.
A sure fix is to rebarrel or set that barrel back and cut a new forcing cone as was already suggested by Mountaingun.
David
Posts: 355 | Location: Baton Rouge, LA | Registered: 07 August 2003
Quote: .. Jim Taylor and I put a .45 Colt cylinder in my .44 Ruger Bisley and fired five rounds into one tight group at 25 yards. Swaging the bullets down from .452" to .430" did not seem to adversely affect the accuracy.
Hitman, how many shoots you fired, any problem with leading?
Few years ago somebody posted that decades back, when he visited S&W as police armorer, one of the revolvers made on the testing bench (25 yds) ONE small hole group. They took it apart and found that somehow the barrel on that particular revolver was missing rifling step, just smooth bore. Revolver was assembled and made again one hole group. They tested it on 50 yds, well this time bullets were all over. Onty.
We just fired a cylinder full for that demonstration. No leading problems in my barrel. Jim told me he has done this on numerous occassions and experienced no problems of any sort.