Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
I've been lusting after the 5.5" Bisley in .45 Colt and was ready to get my LGS to order one then Ruger released the 6.5" .454... For you gents who've shot each or either which makes the most sense for sticking in a hip or chest holster and taking off for a day afield hunting nothing bigger than Eastern deer or black bear? Or for just shooting at the range for a day of fun. FWIW I already load .45 Colt for another revolver and it's a great cartridge. | ||
|
One of Us |
Had a custom John Linebaugh rebored .45Colt Bisley in blue for many.years.I have also taken game with many 6.5" and 7.5" Blackhawks over the years. My choice for shot placement and killing is a 7.5" gun. Having said that, for eaiser carry a 5.5" nice and the traditional Colt SAA mid lenght (for good reason) IMHO a 6.5" is just a poor compromise. Never liked them . If to you want compact and can shoot well,the 5.5" is a nice little gun. | |||
|
Moderator |
Yes, but the 6 1/2-inch configuration (with the long ejector rod housing) is the only way you can get the new SBH in .454 and .480. I now shoot almost nothing but .45 Colt +P loads through mine and am very happy with it. Extremely accurate. I shot this five-shot group at 50 yards with mine stoked with Double Tap's 360 grain .45 Colt + P load. Great accuracy in my book. That said, I love my 5 1/2-inch .45 Colt Bisley, but it never shot this well out of the box. I prefer a 5 1/2-inch barrel personally, but the new SBH is pretty good. "Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming. Semper Fidelis "Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time" | |||
|
One of Us |
Wow! Nice group! I'd wondered if gearing up to make the .454 and .480 cylinders had given Ruger a reason to use a bit more TLC on those pistols. From the looks of that group they sure didn't skimp. I really only intend on shooting cowboy to heavy +p .45 Colt loads and don't see a need for .454 level in my neck of the woods so I was thinking the 5.5" would be enough but that group does make one sit up and take notice. How "bad" does your 5.5" shoot with those or similar loads? | |||
|
One of Us |
As you're asking for thoughts I'll offer mine. I'm a 5 1/2 in. fan. I'm not very tall, a whopping 5'9", I prefer a hip holster to an across the chest and for me the 5 1/2 always seemed the best of both worlds. Longer than the 4 3/4 for a slightly longer sight radius but still enough shorter than the 7 1/2 or 6 /12 to be handy....for me. All but one of my SA revolvers is 5 1/2. DRSS: E. M. Reilley 500 BPE E. Goldmann in Erfurt, 11.15 X 60R Those who fail to study history are condemned to repeat it | |||
|
One of Us |
If you want to carry it a lot and have no plans of needing 454 power the 5.5 in 45 Colt is the clear choice. | |||
|
One of Us |
I mainly own 4"ish barrel revolvers. I'm 5'9" too so I'm leaning toward the 5.5" for holster carry while hunting. But with the iffy performance I've read about with the .45 Ruger revolvers it's interesting to see the group that Whitworth posted. Wonder how hard it would be to get a 6.5" cut down to a 5.5"? | |||
|
One of Us |
Any good smith can cut down the barrel and remount the sight. Just make sure the ejector rod works as planned. I doubt any hunter shooting under field conditions with iron sights could tell any differences in accuracy between the two models | |||
|
One of Us |
Nice shooting! I I'm gonna have to try that Double Tap 360 gr load in my 4 5/8 Blackhawk. I may also have to break down and buy a SBH Bisley .454 too! You seem to be pretty high on these new Rugers. Do you think they are comparable to a BFR in accuracy and quality? As far as the topic at hand.....unless the handgun is going to be used strictly as a hunting tool, I'd probably prefer the 5 1/2" Bisley .45 over a 6 1/2" .454. However, it's tough to make that call because I've not been fortunate enough to handle the new Ruger SBH Bisley. I just know it's longer and heavier. Actually my preference for all around outdoors carry is the 4 5/8 BH as long as +P .45 Colts are the max cal/loads. Anything bigger and I'd prefer the Bisley grip. It smarts when that BH hammer digs into your hand!!! | |||
|
Moderator |
It shot well (it has since turned into a full custom -- see photo below), but not as well as this .454. I had no real complaints it's just that this SBH stands out. I also find it comforting that you can load the .454 any which way you want and there is still a large margin of safety. I too would prefer a 5 1/2-inch barrel, and the barrel can be shortened easily enough but keep in mind that they used the long ejector rod housing on these new revolvers. My .480 version is equally impressive from an accuracy standpoint. I shot this five-shot group at 50 yards with Buffalo Bore's new 370 grain low-recoil load. I haven't even had the time to do any load development. "Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming. Semper Fidelis "Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time" | |||
|
Moderator |
I haven't handled the new 6 1/2" 454 but have shot bisleys in a variety of configurations and barrel lengths and IMHO the 5 1/2" is just perfect in terms of balance and packability. And a six shot 45 colt Ruger will do anything I'll want done in 45 caliber. I do have a hankering for an SA 480 as a companion to my 480 SRH, but that's a different story __________________________________________________ The AR series of rounds, ridding the world of 7mm rem mags, one gun at a time. | |||
|
new member |
Make mine the new 6.5" Bisley .454. I'm not really new. I had 1,000+ posts going back to 1996, when I suddenly found myself unable to Log In, in late 2013 | |||
|
Moderator |
Shot this water buffalo two weeks ago in Texas with my .454 SBH.....loaded with Garrett 405 grain .45 Colt +P loads. I'm really happy with the accuracy. "Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming. Semper Fidelis "Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time" | |||
|
One of Us |
With 45 Colt loads ĺike this why even bother with the 454 loads. Wonder how it would do in a 5.5 gun? George "I went to the woods because I wanted to live deliberately. To front only the essential facts of life and see if I could not learn what it had to teach and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived"- Thoreau | |||
|
One of Us |
My conclusion as well. Heavy loads 45 Colts are perfect. A 5 1/2" barrel is perfection in Bisley IMHO. _____________________________________________________ A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened. - Winston Churchill | |||
|
new member |
Max, garrett shows these are loaded to 1.785 COL. How much room is left in the SBH cylinder??? | |||
|
one of us |
Not single actions but the my 5.5 inch Redhawk seems to be better then my 4 or 7.5. It also gives the best velocity of the 5 44s I had the it ran faster then my 3 7.5s one red hawk and two black hawks Carry better than the 7.5s and just as nice as the 4 inch If I only could have one it would be the 5.5 | |||
|
One of Us |
One shot? Bullet recovered or still sailing? | |||
|
Moderator |
I shot him three times, Ed. Found two bullets actually poking through the skin of the offside shoulder. I will posted a picture later. The third shot exited. The first shot was fatal but I am of the school of hunting that keeps shooting until the animal is permanently anchored to terra firma. "Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming. Semper Fidelis "Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time" | |||
|
Moderator |
Here you go: "Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming. Semper Fidelis "Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time" | |||
|
One of Us |
Whit: I am surprised you did not get full penetration. Do you know what bullet Garret uses? Do you think penetration was decreased due to bullet expansion or slower velocity? I would think a punch bullet at 454 Casull or 475 linebaugh velocities would exit. Did bone or shot placement have an influence? The reason I ask is I do not track like an African so I like holes on both sides.. | |||
|
Moderator |
Hi Bob, I'm pretty pleased with the way they performed and frankly even a bit surprised they did as well as they did. These bullets are scaled up (albeit a little longer for added weight) versions of the Garrett 330s (in .429 Magnum), so I think they are of Randy Garrett's design. One of the bullets had an intact nose, the other was wiped off a bit (probably from more bone contact). Personally, if really big animals like this are what you will regularly shoot, I would step up to the .475s or one of the .50 cals. They are simply better for the job at hand IMHO. Don't get me wrong, they are up to the task, I just like the way my .50s hit comparatively speaking. "Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming. Semper Fidelis "Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time" | |||
|
Moderator |
It's really close (see photos). I will measure it. Fortunately I have never experienced even the slightest crimp pull with these. "Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming. Semper Fidelis "Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time" | |||
|
One of Us |
Not getting full penetration is not surprising. After shooting my cape buff me and a friend did some penetration testing thru the shoulder. Neither barnes buster in 454 or his 475 got full penetration. My initial shot with a 325 gr a frame got full penetration thru the same shoulder. Just means they hit different structures. Granted the buff was over 2000lbs but if ya hit certain connective tissue ya wont get an exit. Its like kevlar. Funny thing is he had 2 full penetration shots on his buff with the busters from his 454 but they were just behind the shoulder and whistled on thru. Go figure. Buff was just about as big body size and horns. Whit, i would be interested to see if the 360's penetrate better. I personally have seen that in my own shooting but ive only had limited use with the 400's in 45 caliber. Those waterbuff have really nasty hide and connective tissue | |||
|
One of Us |
The Garret 365 grain did exit. _____________________________________________________ A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened. - Winston Churchill | |||
|
One of Us |
Guess that answers my question | |||
|
One of Us |
Thanks | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia