one of us
| DJ - Thanks, but you can have all of my .454's, and .500 S&W's.  I do have a Ruger Blackhawk .45 Colt that is all the steam I want for now. I'll just keep my Ruger loads away from Beretta, as you suggest. The Freedom's Arm pistol does interest me or maybe a Gary Reeder's "make-over" of my Ruger. Regards - Riley |
| Posts: 32 | Location: MO | Registered: 15 January 2004 | 
IP
|
|
new member
| Quote:
If you want hotter loads use a Ruger, even better a Freedom Arms model 97...
Bad information. The Model 97 is NOT as strong as a Ruger (per FA), and FA does not even chamber it to the .41 or .44 magnums. The cylinder wall thickness of the .45 Colt M97 is only about 70 percent of the Ruger. Buffalo Bore even loads a special mid-range load especially for the M97. I wouldn't use Ruger or T/C-level loads in the M97. |
| Posts: 8 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 01 January 2003 | 
IP
|
|
Moderator
| Actually, the FA Model 97 is chambered for .41 Mag in a five shot cylinder. I do know it is no Model 83, but I've not heard that the Ruger is a stronger revolver. |
| |
one of us
| I own a Ruger SS Bisley Blackhawk in .45colt and a FA 97 in .45colt. And shoot them both.
FA97: My hunting load will consist of an Oregon Trail 255swc hard cast at velocities of 1000fps or less. Not because of pressure concerns; but because that is all that is needed to take anygame I choose to in my neck of the woods (deer) Read sixgunner.com or sixguns.com if you need more info. Buffalo Bore load for the FA 97 appears to be quite spirited. What is it; 300gr @1200fps? Correct me if I am wrong, but this presentation was created due to the shorter cylinder length of the FA97. I will try some this spring to see how well my FA likes it.
Ruger: Tuff. It has handled everything that I have put through it with no problems or concerns (factory ammo). This revolver has alot of mass for good reason.
I am still at level one on the knowledge pole, but the more I shoot, read and shoot again, the more I like what this caliber has to offer.
J Scott |
| |