THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FUN SHOOTING FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Shooting  Hop To Forums  Fun Shooting    Question: .223 vs Phonebook(s)
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Question: .223 vs Phonebook(s)
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of Not_Infringed
posted
I am going to do some Redneck terminal ballistic testing tomorrow. I'll be pointing my AR at some phone books just to see what will happen. I will be sure to post the results with pics here. But I need a starting point...has anyone done this? About how many inches of phone book will I need to stop the bullet and be able to examine it?

Also a local FBI guy will be in attendance with a genuine Vietnam era M16A1. We will be doing some mag dumps! HAHA!!! I have not fired a full auto gun yet!

Hopefully, we will be detonating some Tannerite too.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"All our liberties are due to men who, when their conscience has compelled them, have broken the laws of the land."
-- William Kingdon Clifford
 
Posts: 65 | Location: KC, MO | Registered: 17 March 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Funny you mention this as I just finished watching the Mythbusters show on "armoring" a car with phone books. They didn't use an AR15 but maxed out at a 12 ga. slug and M1. They went into around 4-5 phone books. I'm guessing the .223 won't go through two depending on how thick they are.

If I recall, they did a test on The Best Defense tv show using a book case with hard and soft bound books as a sort of "cover". It was surprising how few books the various rounds would go through.
 
Posts: 277 | Location: Murphy, TX | Registered: 21 July 2009Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
I had to try it I only had two phone books a total of 4" taped them to each other tight, .223 passed through with ease, no expansion in 1st book opened up half way through 2nd exit hole 1.5" with large tears all around exit hole out to 4" no copper or lead fragments at all left in books, hornady 55gr. sp.
 
Posts: 14 | Registered: 16 March 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Many variables here. Construction of the bullet. Velocity of the load. Distance from the target.
Number of pages in phone book. Quality of paper used to print the phone book.
Valid testing requires only one variable. All other parameters must be held constant.
Numbers collected from experiments allowing multiple variables are just numbers. And any conclusions are just anecdotal stories.

muck
 
Posts: 1052 | Location: Southern OHIO USA | Registered: 17 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Collins
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by muck:
Many variables here. Construction of the bullet. Velocity of the load. Distance from the target.
Number of pages in phone book. Quality of paper used to print the phone book.
Valid testing requires only one variable. All other parameters must be held constant.
Numbers collected from experiments allowing multiple variables are just numbers. And any conclusions are just anecdotal stories.

muck


Fortunately, None of these apply, You forgot to read the FORUM TITLE: "FUN SHOOTING!"


Collins
Airgunner / 458 SOCOMer/ 45-70er / 458 Lotter

www.actionairgun.com LIVE NOW

 
Posts: 2327 | Location: The Sunny South! St. Augustine, FL | Registered: 29 May 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've done this for years to test bullets. I keep phone books from my office. I Take a 72qt cooler and fill it w/ water. When I get to the range I put the phone books in the cooler and let them soak up the water. Then bind 5 w/ duct tape. Then place the bundles end to end at 50 or 100 yds. This has given me similar results to bullets that I have tested on animals. If you want a tougher medium, place one of the books that has NOT been soaked in your bundle--to simulate bone. Fun and informative.
 
Posts: 1135 | Location: corpus, TX | Registered: 02 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of DuggaBoye
posted Hide Post
not a 223 but--

Most recent phonebook test for me--17HMR

Vmax 17gr passed through one soaked Dallas phonebook then one pine 2x4 into a second and retained---12 grains !!!

20gr HP went through phonebook two 2x4's and into the third and retained---16grains !!!


DuggaBoye-O
NRA-Life
Whittington-Life
TSRA-Life
DRSS
DSC
HSC
SCI
 
Posts: 4593 | Location: TX | Registered: 03 March 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Rub Line
posted Hide Post
I've lived in towns so small where the .223 would pass through ALL of the phone books.


-----------------------------------------------------


Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you yourself will be just like him. Proverbs 26-4


National Rifle Association Life Member

 
Posts: 1992 | Location: WI | Registered: 28 September 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
True story. Back in 1971 I had a buddy that worked for the phone company in Dallas Texas.

They had a pretty "fat" phone book even back then.

I wanted to do some "testing", and asked him if he could get me a few phone books.

So he did. He brought me 500 [yes, five hundred Eeker] of them.

They were packed in plastic shrink wrap, 10 phone books to a "bundle"... shocker


DOUBLE RIFLE SHOOTERS SOCIETY
 
Posts: 16134 | Location: Texas | Registered: 06 April 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Shooting  Hop To Forums  Fun Shooting    Question: .223 vs Phonebook(s)

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia