THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Seating Depth
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I have just finished loadings changing the seating depth for 52grn projectiles in my 223Rem.

The best group sizes were at .010" out from the lands and 0.008" into the lands.

I've experienced the same situation or very close enough for other weight projectiles.

Is this just co-incidence or is there a pattern or what-ever?
 
Posts: 161 | Location: Australia | Registered: 28 August 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of BNagel
posted Hide Post
It is what it is. Every rifle is different, but you may find that generally seating at a certain length away from the lands works for your subset of rifles. I've had good results seating to the cannelure of various bullets.


_______________________


 
Posts: 4893 | Location: Bryan, Texas | Registered: 12 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
It's a crap shoot. I usually start with the bullets as close to the lands as possible without actually touching them.

Numerous articles have been published on this subject, and as with articles of this nature, they have appeared to have varying shades of credibility.

The most prevalent theory is that changing the seating depth slightly is akin to modifying the nodes of the barrel oscillations in such manner that the bullet exits the barrel at a consistent place in the oscillation cycle. IF there is some grain of truth in this theory, then it would stand to reason that there is more than one seating depth which would result in consistency, i.e., multiples of harmonics. Hence, your finding two distinctly different seating depths which exhibit similar and better accuracy compared to other seating depths.

The downside to tuning for accuracy with small increments in bullet seating depth is that you could burn up a barrel (and a wallet full of money) shooting enough samples to discover the "sweet spot". When you factor in doing something similar with powder charges, powder types, and even powder lots, plus types and brands of primers, your variables are so many that it would seem statistically impossible to tune for the most accurate load during the lifetime of a single barrel. Big Grin
 
Posts: 13263 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
the only way i load with the bullet into the lands is if i'm shooting where i have a cleaning rod handy in case one gets stuck . Ejecting a live round that has the bullet in the lands and having the bullet stick is rather embarrassing when hunting
 
Posts: 13466 | Location: faribault mn | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Steyrl, the above posts pretty well nail it.
Typically I start at magazine length, and tune OAL last, and only if needed for the reason mentioned by Stoney.
 
Posts: 3034 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 01 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks everyone for the replies. I knew I get good, informative answers.

Smiler
 
Posts: 161 | Location: Australia | Registered: 28 August 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia