Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
<Powderman> |
Leave the lube on. In my early days of casting, I experimented with double lubed bullets for my .44. I did not note an accuracy difference, but the leading problem did decrease significantly. ------------------ | ||
<Maj Dad> |
Mud, I read an article in Handloading magazine a couple of years back about using Lee Drop Out for bullet molds. It's a micronized carbon spray and works great when casting, and I tried it on unlubricated, sized and unsized cast bullets, and it works. It works to the tune of no lead in the bore, period (in several pistols and rifles I have tried it in). I even sprayed some commercial hard cast and lubed bullets for use in a pistol that has an affinity for lead in any presentation, and found not a speck of plumbum anywhere. When you clean the bore you occasionally see tiny flecks, but the metal itself is lead free. It's easy, cheap, and worth a try. I was skeptical, but had some on-hand and gave it the old college try, and I now use it for the lead lovers in my collection. Regards George Jacoby ------------------ | ||
one of us |
Mud, does the bullet fit real tight in the bores of the cylinder? The area in the cylinder from the seated postion to the gap between the barrel. I take a bullet and try to put in in from the front and if I can push it in I know I'll get leading in the forcing cone with or without a lot of lube. stronics | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia