THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS

Page 1 2 

Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Bumping The Shoulder Question...
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of 243winxb
posted Hide Post
Belted cartridge - When head clearance is adjusted off the shoulder, with only 1 or 2 thousands bump, the area in front of the belt becomes unsupported in the rifle chamber. This unsupported area may bulge after a few firing, if using full power loads. SAAMI drawing A maximum chamber headspace at .227" when compared to a minimum cartridge belt head clearance (.220" -.008") or .212" = .015" slop. Hopefully, your chamber is tighter.
 
Posts: 1295 | Location: USA | Registered: 21 May 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
If you EVER need a collet-type lower body sizing die in order for your loads to chamber (regardless of whether the case is rimless, rimmed, rebated, semi-rimmed, or belted) then your pressures are unsustainable. You'll be using Scotch tape to keep your primers in at that point.


Roll Eyes I have reloaded the same Winchester brass in my 7mm Rem mag up to 14 times. Using the same load. The collet die sizes where the FL die, especially when PFL sizing cannot. Right at the belt, not the belt, just above it for a few thousandths.
 
Posts: 42532 | Location: Crosby and Barksdale, Texas | Registered: 18 September 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Belted magnum cartridges have been around for over 50 years, and most shooters that reload them are familiar with the case bulge problem that occurs "just above" the belt. This usually happens after just 2 or 3 firings - wasting perfectly good cases. Many shooters have discovered this problem when they find their handloads begin to stick in their chamber, or when they no longer chamber at all.


I dislike belted magnums, have had rim lock, in the magazine, with my M70 375 H&H, and this is just another good reason to dislike the belted magnum case design.

Another good reason is that the shoulder to base distance is not controlled. The cartridge headspaces off the belt and it is easy, and common, to push the shoulder back too much. I had to buy the special Wilson case gage, pictured here:

Extending Cartridge Case Life

http://www.realguns.com/Commentary/comar46.htm

Because it required special gages to set up my dies to bump the shoulder back so that I don't have resistance closing. And once the die is set up for one rifle, it won't work belted magnum brass fired in another rifle, because the shoulder to base distance is not controlled.

As someone who wants perfect function, I don't neck size, and I don't want crush fit cases. I have shot out enough barrels in high powder competition to know that cases that are an interference fit in, are eventually going to be an interference fit out. It may not bother a hunter to have to find a cleaning rod to knock the case out of the chamber, but for me, breaking position, losing track of the wind, and eating up my allotted shooting time because the case won't come out, is reason enough to full length resize.
 
Posts: 1233 | Registered: 10 October 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 243winxb:
Belted cartridge - When head clearance is adjusted off the shoulder, with only 1 or 2 thousands bump, the area in front of the belt becomes unsupported in the rifle chamber. This unsupported area may bulge after a few firing, if using full power loads. SAAMI drawing A maximum chamber headspace at .227" when compared to a minimum cartridge belt head clearance (.220" -.008") or .212" = .015" slop. Hopefully, your chamber is tighter.


In my case...not LT's...there is no shoulder as I was talking about a .458 WM.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38623 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
243winxb

243winxb,
That link to Brownel about headspacing was a great help.
Thanks,
 
Posts: 42 | Location: Southeast US | Registered: 21 October 2010Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia